Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Matthew J & Gilda F Strazzula Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$286kReligion$65kHealth$61kYouth Development$33kInternational$26kHuman Services$16kFood & Nutrition$12kHousing & Shelter$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$504k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SENTINEL MINISTRIES$25,000
CONGO EDUCATION PARTNERS INC$10,000
NEW ENGLAND DISABLED SPORTS$3,000
BOSTON MARATHON JIMMY FUND WALK$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WOLFBORO AREA CHILDREN'S CENTER: $1k → 9%WOLFBORO AREA CHILDREN'S CENTER: $1k → 9%WOLFEBORO AREA CHILDREN'S CENTER: $500 → 9%WOLFBORO AREA CHILDREN'S CENTER: $500 → 9%WINDRUSH FARM: $1k → 10%WINDRUSH FARM: $1k → 10%COMMUNITY GIVING TREE: $2k → 10%COMMUNITY GIVING TREE: $2k → 10%WINDRUSH FARM: $1k → 10%WINDRUSH FARM: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$467k · 22 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +79% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
10

Total granted

$467k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+1%

Still filing today

55%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalEducationReligionHealthFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SENTINEL MINISTRIES
    5× · 2020–2024 · $65k · revenue +168%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $25k · revenue +132%
  • ESPERANZA ACADEMY INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $10k · revenue +492%

Funded once

  • HC
    HARTWICK COLLEGE -COVID
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • HC
    HARTWICK COLLEGE J TERM - INNER CITY STUDENTS
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • TD
    THE DIMOCK CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
2
Neighborhealth Corporation

Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…

Health
3
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
4
Ceres Inc

Ceres is a nonprofit advocacy organization working to accelerate the transition to a cleaner, more just, and resilient world. through education and research, we make the business case for action on the most pressing sustainability…

Environment
5
Massachusetts Education & Career Opportunities Inc

Massachusetts education and career opportunities, inc. (massedco, inc.) is a statewide network of service sites that provides education and career advising to over 12,000 low-income, first generation individuals each year. massedco…

Education
6
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
7
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
8
Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment
9
Massachusetts Housing Investment Corporation

Mhic's mission is to be an innovative private financier of afforable housing and community development throughout new england, providing financing that would not otherwise be available, and extending the impact of that financing to ensure…

Housing & Shelter
10
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

12
Concord Children's Center Inc

To cultivate an intimate, welcoming community where children develop respectful relationships and inquisitive minds, build confidence in their individual gifts, and are engaged, prepared and inspired to learn.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Essex County Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HARTWICK COLLEGE INNER CITY STUDENT — $200,000 · OtherHARTWICK COLLEGE INNER CITY STUDENTBOSTON MARATHON JIMMY FUND WALK — $33,000 · OtherBOSTON MARATHON JIMMY FUND WALKYMCA - DORCHESTER BRANCH — $20,000 · OtherYMCA - DORCHESTER BRANCHMOTHER CAROLINE ACA & ED CTR — $16,000 · OtherHARTWICK COLLEGE J TERM — $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $13,500 · Other+19 more — $60,500 · Other+19 moreSENTINEL MINISTRIES — $64,500 · ReligionSENTINEL MINIS…PARTNERS IN DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED — $16,000 · InternationalCONGO EDUCATION PARTNERS INC — $10,000 · InternationalDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $25,000 · HealthThe Food Project Inc — $12,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY GIVING TREE INC — $4,500 · Human ServicesWINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC — $4,000 · Human ServicesWOLFEBORO AREA CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesESPERANZA ACADEMY INC — $10,000 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORG — $1,000 · Education
Other$358,000Religion$64,500International$26,000Health$25,000Food & Nutrition$12,000Human Services$11,500Education$11,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSENTINEL MINISTRIES — $64,500 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Food Project Inc — $12,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetESPERANZA ACADEMY INC — $10,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCONGO EDUCATION PARTNERS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY GIVING TREE INC — $4,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetLAWRENCE COMMUNITYWORKS INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HYDE SQUARE TASK FORCE INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBROCKTON NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND DISABLED SPORTS — $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWOLFEBORO AREA CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $3,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAVE THE HARBORSAVE THE BAY INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetESSEX COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SENTINEL MINISTRIES
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED
  • Who funds The Food Project Inc
  • Who funds ESPERANZA ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds CONGO EDUCATION PARTNERS INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY GIVING TREE INC
  • Who funds LAWRENCE COMMUNITYWORKS INC
  • Who funds WINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC
  • Who funds THE HYDE SQUARE TASK FORCE INC
  • Who funds BROCKTON NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND DISABLED SPORTS
  • Who funds WOLFEBORO AREA CHILDREN'S CENTER INC
  • Who funds SAVE THE HARBORSAVE THE BAY INC
  • Who funds ESSEX COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank FoundationMA20.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Essex County Community Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Rogers Family Foundation · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Matthew J & Gilda F Strazzula Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 9%
  • The Hyde Square Task Force Inc52% of income from government
  • Brockton Neighborhood Health Center Inc9% of income from government
  • Lawrence Communityworks Inc9% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Essex County Community Foundation Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Matthew J & Gilda F Strazzula Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Matthew J & Gilda F Strazzula Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph