Skip to content

· Private foundation

Matthew & Susan K Lyons Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$85k
Granted FY2019
13
Grants FY2019
3
States reached
$24k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

80% of Matthew & Susan K Lyons Family Foundation Inc’s FY2020 grant dollars went to Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Matthew & Susan K Lyons Family Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $85k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’17
4
’18
8
’19
4
’20

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Education$126kPhilanthropy$72kHealth$62kHuman Services$15kArts & Culture$15kReligion$13kOther$0
02FY2019 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k11 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$6,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAMUEL WAXMAN CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$24,000
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY$16,250
ST PATRICK'S CATHEDRAL$7,500
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NY$6,000
COLLEGE OF HOLY CROSS$6,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$6,000
FORDHAM UNIVERSITY$6,000
HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY$4,000
NY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$2,540
AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY$2,000
MUSEM OF MODERN ART$1,750
EVA'S VILLAGE$1,645
THE MORGAN LIBRARY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 68% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%COLLEGE OF HOLY CROSS: $6k → 11%SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND: $72k → 10%SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $18k → 14%THE MORGAN LIBRARY: $1k → 17%fordham university: $11k → 28%franklin lakes PBA: $10k → 7%EVA'S VILLAGE: $2k → 12%COLLEGE OF HOLY CROSS: $6k → 11%SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $16k → 14%ST PATRICK'S CATHEDRAL: $8k → 17%FORDHAM UNIVERSITY: $6k → 28%EVA'S VILLAGE: $2k → 12%college of holy cross: $6k → 11%syracuse university: $15k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NY: $6k → 17%FORDHAM UNIVERSITY: $6k → 28%passaic county historical society: $250 → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NY: $500 → 17%HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY: $4k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $12k → 17%New York University: $11k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $6k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $6k → 17%SAMUEL WAXMAN CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%SAMUEL WAXMAN CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $24k → 17%samuel waxman cancer research foundation: $5k → 17%MUSEM OF MODERN ART: $2k → 17%SAMUEL WAXMAN CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $4k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $5k → 17%american museum of natural history: $6k → 17%NY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3k → 17%NY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3k → 17%AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $2k → 17%alsac st jude: $6k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$206k · 9 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$206k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
-4%

Still filing today

78%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
EducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $49k · revenue +45%
  • NY
    New York University
    4× · 2017–2020 · $35k · revenue +76%
  • FU
    Fordham University
    3× · 2017–2019 · $23k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • AS
    alsac st jude
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
2
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
3
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
4
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
7
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
8
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
9
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
10
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
11
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fordham University; the most unlike its peers is Passaic County Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $48,750 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITYNew York University: $35,367 · EducationNew York UniversityFordham University: $23,400 · EducationFordham UniversityTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS: $17,700 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSSSAMUEL WAXMAN CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $58,000 · OtherSAMUEL WAXMAN CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDAT…Individual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST PATRICK'S CATHEDRAL: $7,500 · OtherST PATRICK'S CATHEDRALCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NY: $6,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NYalsac st jude: $5,800 · Otheralsac st judeNY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5,040 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES: $5,000 · OtherHOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY: $4,000 · Other+1 more: $1,000 · OtherDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $71,762 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE …American Museum of Natural History: $7,700 · Arts & CultureMuseum of Modern Art: $1,750 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $250 · Arts & CultureEVA'S VILLAGE INC: $3,290 · Community Improvement
Education$125,217Other$102,840Philanthropy$71,762Arts & Culture$9,700Community Improvement$3,290

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $71,762 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMUEL WAXMAN CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $58,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $48,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $35,367 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFordham University: $23,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS: $17,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History: $7,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEVA'S VILLAGE INC: $3,290 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPASSAIC COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Matthew & Susan K Lyons Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Matthew & Susan K Lyons Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 19%
  • Eva's Village Inc: 19% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Matthew & Susan K Lyons Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Matthew & Susan K Lyons Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Matthew & Susan K Lyons Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph