Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Matthew & Susan K Lyons Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$85k
Granted FY2019
13
Grants FY2019
3
States reached
$24k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

80% of Matthew & Susan K Lyons Family Foundation Inc’s FY2020 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Matthew & Susan K Lyons Family Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $85k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
17
4
18
8
19
4
20

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0167% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172020.

Education$125kPhilanthropy$72kArts & Culture$10kCommunity Improvement$3kOther$103k
02FY2019 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k11 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$6,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAMUEL WAXMAN CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$24,000
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY$16,250
ST PATRICK'S CATHEDRAL$7,500
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NY$6,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$6,000
FORDHAM UNIVERSITY$6,000
COLLEGE OF HOLY CROSS$6,000
HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY$4,000
NY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$2,540
AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY$2,000
MUSEM OF MODERN ART$1,750
EVA'S VILLAGE$1,645
THE MORGAN LIBRARY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 68% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%COLLEGE OF HOLY CROSS: $6k → 11%SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND: $72k → 10%SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $18k → 14%THE MORGAN LIBRARY: $1k → 17%fordham university: $11k → 28%franklin lakes PBA: $10k → 7%EVA'S VILLAGE: $2k → 12%COLLEGE OF HOLY CROSS: $6k → 11%SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $16k → 14%ST PATRICK'S CATHEDRAL: $8k → 17%FORDHAM UNIVERSITY: $6k → 28%EVA'S VILLAGE: $2k → 12%college of holy cross: $6k → 11%syracuse university: $15k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NY: $6k → 17%FORDHAM UNIVERSITY: $6k → 28%passaic county historical society: $250 → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NY: $500 → 17%HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY: $4k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $12k → 17%New York University: $11k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $6k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $6k → 17%SAMUEL WAXMAN CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%SAMUEL WAXMAN CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $24k → 17%samuel waxman cancer research foundation: $5k → 17%MUSEM OF MODERN ART: $2k → 17%SAMUEL WAXMAN CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $4k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $5k → 17%american museum of natural history: $6k → 17%NY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3k → 17%NY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3k → 17%AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $2k → 17%alsac st jude: $6k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$206k · 9 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$206k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
-4%

Still filing today

78%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
EducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $49k · revenue +45%
  • NY
    New York University
    4× · 2017–2020 · $35k · revenue +76%
  • FU
    Fordham University
    3× · 2017–2019 · $23k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • AS
    alsac st jude
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES
    one grant, 2018 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
2
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
3
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
4
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
7
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
8
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
9
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
10
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
11
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fordham University and the most unlike its peers is Passaic County Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $48,750 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITYNew York University — $35,367 · EducationNew York UniversityFordham University — $23,400 · EducationFordham UniversityTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS — $17,700 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSSSAMUEL WAXMAN CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $58,000 · OtherSAMUEL WAXMAN CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDAT…Individual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST PATRICK'S CATHEDRAL — $7,500 · OtherST PATRICK'S CATHEDRALCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NY — $6,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NYalsac st jude — $5,800 · Otheralsac st judeNY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $5,040 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES — $5,000 · OtherHOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY — $4,000 · Other+1 more — $1,000 · OtherDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $71,762 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE …American Museum of Natural History — $7,700 · Arts & CultureMuseum of Modern Art — $1,750 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $250 · Arts & CultureEVA'S VILLAGE INC — $3,290 · Community Improvement
Education$125,217Other$102,840Philanthropy$71,762Arts & Culture$9,700Community Improvement$3,290

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $71,762 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMUEL WAXMAN CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $58,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $48,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University — $35,367 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFordham University — $23,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS — $17,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History — $7,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEVA'S VILLAGE INC — $3,290 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art — $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPASSAIC COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Matthew & Susan K Lyons Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 19%
  • Eva's Village Inc19% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Matthew & Susan K Lyons Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Matthew & Susan K Lyons Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph