Skip to content

· Private foundation

Matthew 25 40 Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$2.0MEducation$545kHealth$143kYouth Development$30kRecreation & Sports$13kHousing & Shelter$2kHuman Services$2kCivil Rights$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $500
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$84
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PAUL RICHARDSON CO MATTHEW 25 40 FO$10,000
PAWS OF LOVE ANIMAL RESCUE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WORD OF LIFE: $5k → 10%PAWS OF LOVE ANIMAL RESCUE: $500 → 5%CUDAS UNHOOKED: $1k → 12%SOUTHSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $250k → 10%MICHAEL KNIGHTS CHILDREN EDUCATION FUND: $10k → 15%NATIONAL D-DAY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $13k → 8%VIRGINIA FIRST AUDIT: $3k → 12%ROADS TO RECOVERY: $100k → 13%PRAISE THE LORD LLC: $8k → 19%THOMAS ROAD BAPTIST CHURCH: $1.7M → 20%PAUL RICHARDSON CO MATTHEW 25 40 FO: $10k → 20%ATLAS FOUNDATION: $10k → 19%CUDAS UNHOOKED: $1k → 12%SOUTHSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $250k → 10%ALL NATIONS COMMUNITY CHURCH: $25k → 13%HERITAGE BAPTIST CHURCH: $204k → 20%WORD OF LIFE: $15k → 20%HALIFAX HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%ROADS TO RECOVERY: $10k → 13%HERITAGE BAPTIST CHURCH: $22k → 20%WORD OF LIFE: $5k → 20%ROADS TO RECOVERY: $10k → 13%THOMAS ROAD BAPTIST CHURCH: $15k → 20%BLUE RIDGE PREGNANCY CENTER: $10k → 13%ROADS TO RECOVERY: $8k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER LYNCHBURG: $30k → 13%IRON LIVES: $25k → 13%YWCA: $2k → 13%ONE COMMUNITY ONE VOICE: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 6 repeat orgs$155k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against -21% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
13

Total granted

$2.6M
$145k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
-21%

Still filing today

50%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THOMAS ROAD BAPTIST CHURCH
    2× · 2021–2023 · $1.7M
  • SC
    SOUTHSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $500k · revenue -9%
  • HB
    HERITAGE BAPTIST CHURCH
    2× · 2019–2020 · $226k

Funded once

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER LYNCHBURG
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue -21%
  • IL
    IRON LIVES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -8%
  • AN
    ALL NATIONS COMMUNITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Axiom Christian Classical School

To provide a comprehensive Christian Classical education to grades 1-12.

Education
2
Liberty Christian School Inc

To provide quality educational services to students in grades kindergarten through twelve, in a Christ-centered environment.

Education
3
Life Choices Resource Center Inc

To provide pregnancy testing (including ultrasound examinations), counseling, and referrals as needed (including post-abortion counseling) in our offices and through our 24-hour help-line.

—
4
Covenant Christian School

Covenant Christian School (CCS) is committed to the academic, spiritual, physical, and social growth of our children in a Christ-centered environment. Continued on Schedule O Covenant Christian School cultivates a distinctive generation…

Education
5
Collin County Cornerstone Christian Academy

The organization operates a non-denominational school providing a christian environment for learning.

Education
6
Cornerstone Christian School

The school provides a biblically sound education program of high academic standards in a loving environment that meets the need of the whole child: spiritually, academically, physically, and socially.

—
7
Coastal Christian High School Inc

Provide faith based education with an emphasis on college preparation.

Education
8
Arlington Christian School Inc

The school's mission is to train each student in a Godly manner in the areas of social, spiritual, and academic development.

—
9
University Charter School

Operation of a public charter school in Livingston, AL.

Education
10
Arundel Christian School Inc

Non denominational Christian School open to all ethnicities to provide quality Pre-K thru 12th grade education where positive values are supported and enhanced. Approximately 305 students are enrolled.

—
11
Lux Classical Christian Inc

Lux Classical Christian Inc. is a 3-day-a-week Classical Christian education program. We encourage Christ-centered leaders who reflect His depth, wisdom, and virtue. We partner with parents to equip children spiritually, academically, and…

Education
12
Lake Norman Christian School

The mission of Lake Norman Christian School is to provide a college-preparatory education in a safe and nurturing environment grounded in the Christian faith.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of Greater Lynchburg; the most unlike its peers is Blue Ridge Pregnancy Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THOMAS ROAD BAPTIST CHURCH: $1,694,601 · OtherTHOMAS ROAD BAPTIST CHURCHHERITAGE BAPTIST CHURCH: $226,395 · OtherHERITAGE BAPTIST CHURCH+12 more: $113,200 · Other+12 moreSOUTHSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $500,000 · EducationSOUTHSIDE CHRISTIAN S…+1 more: $9,650 · EducationROADS TO RECOVERY INC: $127,500 · HealthBlue Ridge Pregnancy Center Inc: $10,000 · HealthBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER LYNCHBURG: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentNATIONAL D-DAY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $12,500 · Recreation & SportsCUDAS UNHOOKED INC: $2,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$2,034,196Education$509,650Health$137,500Youth Development$30,000Recreation & Sports$12,500Housing & Shelter$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $500,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetROADS TO RECOVERY INC: $127,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER LYNCHBURG: $30,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetIRON LIVES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetNATIONAL D-DAY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBlue Ridge Pregnancy Center Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCUDAS UNHOOKED INC: $2,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds ROADS TO RECOVERY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER LYNCHBURG ↗
  • Who funds IRON LIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL D-DAY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Blue Ridge Pregnancy Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds ATLAS FOUNDATION CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CUDAS UNHOOKED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foster FoundationVA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foster Foundation · Centra Health Inc · Greater Lynchburg Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Matthew 25 40 Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Matthew 25 40 Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Matthew 25 40 Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Matthew 25 40 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Matthew 25 40’s filings →

    More from the funding graph