· Private foundation
Matan Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $115k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $399k
- $250k+1 grant · $383k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES | $383,000 |
| BUILDING FUTURES PROJECT INC | $155,000 |
| STONE RIDGE SCHOOL OF THE SACRED HEART | $100,000 |
| GONZAGA COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL | $93,321 |
| NICKLAUS CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION | $51,000 |
| YELLOW RIBBON FUND INC | $40,000 |
| SAINT JANE DE CHANTAL SCHOOL | $22,750 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF FREDERICK COUNTY | $20,000 |
| WASHINGTON JESUIT ACADEMY | $18,000 |
| REHOBOTH BEACH HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $14,677 |
| THE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| STARBOARD CHARITABLE INC | $5,000 |
| CATHOLIC BUSINESS NETWORK OF MC SCHOLARSHIP AND GRANT FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| POOR ROBERT'S MISSION | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $173k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
23 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $195k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTHE CATHOLIC CHARITIES FOUNDATION OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON3× · 2018–2021 · $142k · revenue +19%
- NCNicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation3× · 2022–2024 · $126k · revenue +35%
- TFTHE FATHER MCKENNA CENTER INC2× · 2020–2022 · $103k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $250k
- SRSTONE RIDGE SCH OF THE SACRED HEARTone grant, 2017 · $25k
- SESAINT EDMONDS CATHOLIC CHURCHone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Catholic charities of the archdiocese of washington is the area's leading provider of comprehensive human services, offered to individuals and families in need, through 47 programs in 29 locations in the district of columbia, montgomery,…
Ronald mcdonald house charities of greater washington, dc (rmhcdc) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.
Create a more accessible, sustainable, prosperous and livable national capital region by being a discussion forum, expert resource, issue advocate, and catalyst for action.
The mission is to bring compassion to health care and to be good to those in need, especially those who are poor and dying. as a system of caregivers, we commit ourselves to help bring people and communities to health and wholeness.
Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.
The ronald mcdonald house charities of charlottesville, inc is organized to maintain and operate one or more facilities in the area of charlottesville, virginia to provide temporary housing for seriously ill children and their families…
Collegebound empowers baltimore city schools' students to successfully pursue and complete a college degree or other post-secondary options. as a trusted advocate for city-wide college access, retention, and graduation, we provide…
To provide quality, compassionate human services to all people, especially the most vulnerable, regardless of faith, by empowering individuals, streghening families and building community through faith and service.
St. Mary's Center for Women and Children (SMC), a multi-service organization supporting women, children, and families, believes shelter is not enough to erase the devastation of cyclical poverty and homelessness.Grounded in social justice,…
The Washington Commanders Foundation is committed to building a more vibrant and enriched DMV community by investing in education, honoring public service, and broadening access to youth football programs. By harnessing the transformative…
To send care and comfort packages to deployed american military heroes who are stationed in active duty theaters around the world, as well as to facilitate activities that elevate morale of all veterans
To help people who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless seek, obtain, and retain employment and secure housing.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Entryway and the most unlike its peers is The Shepherd Foundation Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BUILDING FUTURES PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE CATHOLIC CHARITIES FOUNDATION OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds Nicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE FATHER MCKENNA CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds YELLOW RIBBON FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF FREDERICK COUNTY MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds REHOBOTH BEACH HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds ENTRYWAY ↗
- Who funds THE SHEPHERD FOUNDATION LTD ↗
- Who funds STARBOARD CHARITABLE INC ↗
- Who funds BETHESDA CARES INC ↗
- Who funds Poor Roberts Mission ↗
- Who funds BRIDGES TO INDEPENDENCE ↗
- Who funds Operation Second Chance Inc ↗
- Who funds MANY HANDS INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Andreas Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · Clark Charitable Foundation Inc Dba a James & Alice B Clark Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · The Shepherd Foundation Ltd · Spm Foundation Inc · William S Abell Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Matan Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bethesda Cares Inc — 100% of income from government
- Rehoboth Beach Historical Society — 10% of income from government
- Yellow Ribbon Fund Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Matan Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Matan Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.