How much did MATAN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 89% of MATAN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

outreacheducation

2019

—

2020

further exempt

2021

housinghomelessactionwomenacademicgrowthfaith

2022

beyondwomenyoungactionacademicmengrowth

2023

childrenregardlesshealthybeachwomenacademicsocial

2024

further exemptchildrenemotionalsocialacademicgrowthcatholic

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k4 grants · $15k
$10k–50k5 grants · $115k
$50k–250k4 grants · $399k
$250k+1 grant · $383k

$22,750

Median grant

States reached

$4.5M

Total assets

Largest grants

CATHOLIC CHARITIES$383,000
BUILDING FUTURES PROJECT INC$155,000
STONE RIDGE SCHOOL OF THE SACRED HEART$100,000
GONZAGA COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL$93,321
NICKLAUS CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION$51,000
YELLOW RIBBON FUND INC$40,000
SAINT JANE DE CHANTAL SCHOOL$22,750
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF FREDERICK COUNTY$20,000
WASHINGTON JESUIT ACADEMY$18,000
REHOBOTH BEACH HISTORICAL SOCIETY$14,677
STARBOARD CHARITABLE INC$5,000
THE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY$5,000
CATHOLIC BUSINESS NETWORK OF MC SCHOLARSHIP AND GRANT FOUNDATION$3,000
POOR ROBERT'S MISSION$1,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $173k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.2M · 23 repeat orgs$693k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +102% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.2M

$427k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+102%

+35%

Still filing today

43%

30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $266k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesPhilanthropyPublic BenefitFood & NutritionEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NC
NICKLAUS CHILDRENS HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION
2× · 2022–2023 · $75k · revenue +44%
YR
YELLOW RIBBON FUND INC
2× · 2019–2024 · $52k · revenue +45%
TS
THE SHEPHERD FOUNDATION
2× · 2019–2020 · $10k · revenue +102%

Funded once

UC
UNCCAROLINA COVENANT
one grant, 2019 · $250k
CC
CATHOLIC CHARITIES FOUNDATION OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON
one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +19%
SR
STONE RIDGE SCH OF THE SACRED HEART
one grant, 2017 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of

Easing the hardship of children's illness on families through programs that directly improve the health and wellbeing of children.

Health

Montgomery County Community Foundation

Creating legacies to fulfill philanthropic dreams through grants to nonprofits and scholarships

Philanthropy

University of Dc Foundation Inc

Education

Thrive Dc

Thrive dc works to prevent and end homelessness by providing vulnerable individuals with a comprehensive range of services to help stabilize their lives.

Food & Nutrition

Bon Secours - Richmond Health System Inc

Bon secours-richmond health system extends the healing ministry of jesus by improving the health and well-being of our communities and bring good help to those in need, especially people who are poor, dying and underserved. bon…

Health

Women Giving Back Inc

Women Giving Back (WGB) supports vulnerable families in the Greater Washington DC area by providing quality clothing and other essentials at no cost assisted by a caring and committed community.

Employment

Washington Dc Meals on Wheels Inc

We deliver healthy delicious meals to our home-bound neighbors. In 2022 230 volunteers delivered 55,642 meals to 238 clients. We are mission-focused growth-oriented and committed to serving our community.

—

Commonwealth Catholic Charities

To provide quality, compassionate human services to all people, especially the most vulnerable.

Human Services

Downtowndc Foundation

The downtowndc foundation is a 501(c)(3) organization that supports philanthropic initiatives in downtowndc. our mission is to serve and celebrate our vibrant and diverse downtowndc community by providing homeless services, revitalizing…

Unclassified

The District of Columbia Bar Foundation

To fund, support, and improve legal representation of the disadvantaged in the district of columbia.

Crime & Legal

Goldey-Beacom College

To confer the associate, baccalaureate and graduate degrees on qualified students.

Education

The Arc of the District

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Entryway and the most unlike its peers is The Father Mckenna Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/24

the rest of the field

10%

1,356/12,977

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

18/18

Grantees still filing

13/18

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$3,472,025Human Services$172,500Philanthropy$129,000Food & Nutrition$108,500Arts & Culture$14,677Public Benefit$11,000Housing & Shelter$2,500Education$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC22.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · Clark Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way of the National Capital Area · Andreas Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MATAN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE FATHER MCKENNA CENTER.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 461406974 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THE FATHER MCKENNA CENTER, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 6% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Matan Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Matan Family Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MATAN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Matan Family Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

MATAN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Matan Family Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph