Skip to content

Alaska · Public charity

Mat-Su Trails & Parks Foundation

To promote trails and parks in the Matanuska Susitna Borough

$673k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
12
Grants FY2025
8
Organizations funded FY2024
50%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$44,478
Largest grant, FY2025
$168,815
Organizations funded a year
7 to 12
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$1.5M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 50% of the organizations Mat-Su Trails & Parks Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 46% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $172k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsEnvironmentPublic Safety & DisasterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving12$708k0%
FY20248$376k50%
FY202312$469k33%
FY202211$397k45%
FY20219$242k67%
FY202011$290k36%
FY201912$299k67%
FY20187$266kn/a
96% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$1.8MEnvironment$342kPublic Benefit$240kCommunity Improvement$159kArts & Culture$104kPublic Safety & Disaster$66kAnimals$51kYouth Development$50kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Alaska Trails$348,30566%
Hatcher Alpine Xperience$210,25045%
Valley Mountain Bikers and Hikers$162,811655%
City of Wasilla$147,5004n/a
Matsu Ski Club$143,735335%
Willow Area Community Organization Inc$128,373647%
The Student Conservation Association Inc$97,07030%
Matanuska Susitn$92,3751n/a
Mountaineering Club of Alaska Inc$76,8902n/a
Hatcher Pass Avalanche Center Inc$65,935324%
Show all 26 grantees
All grantees of Mat-Su Trails & Parks Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Alaska Trails$348,30566%
Hatcher Alpine Xperience$210,25045%
Valley Mountain Bikers and Hikers$162,811655%
City of Wasilla$147,5004n/a
Matsu Ski Club$143,735335%
Willow Area Community Organization Inc$128,373647%
The Student Conservation Association Inc$97,07030%
Matanuska Susitn$92,3751n/a
Mountaineering Club of Alaska Inc$76,8902n/a
Hatcher Pass Avalanche Center Inc$65,935324%
Meadow Lakes Community Development Inc$56,1003n/a
Alaskans for Palmer Hay Flats$50,2102n/a
Friends of State Parks Mat Su$46,664156%
Hatcher Pass Snow Riders$40,0001n/a
Rotary International Club of Susitna$40,0001n/a
The Great Land Trust Inc$35,00021%
State Of Alaska$34,7851n/a
Curry Ridge Riders Inc$32,000152%
Lake Louise Snowmachine Club Inc$25,000125%
United Way of Matanuska-Susitna Borough$20,00012%
Mid Valley Trail Club Inc$19,2001n/a
Big Lake Trails Inc$18,7501n/a
Willow Dog Mushers Association$16,0001n/a
Mat-Su 2024 Arctic Winter Games Hos$15,00011%
Denali Nordic Ski Club Inc$10,0001n/a
Coalition for Susitna Dam Alternatives$8,20015%

Plus 12 recipients with no EIN on record ($1.1M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Mat-Su Trails & Parks Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 5 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 14 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAlaska Trails: $348,305 over 6y, 6.0% of budgetHatcher Alpine Xperience: $210,250 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetValley Mountain Bikers and Hikers: $162,811 over 6y, 55% of budgetMatsu Ski Club: $143,735 over 3y, 35% of budgetWillow Area Community Organization Inc: $128,373 over 6y, 47% of budgetThe Student Conservation Association Inc: $97,070 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHatcher Pass Avalanche Center Inc: $65,935 over 3y, 24% of budgetFriends of State Parks Mat Su: $46,664 over 1y, 56% of budgetThe Great Land Trust Inc: $35,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCurry Ridge Riders Inc: $32,000 over 1y, 52% of budgetLake Louise Snowmachine Club Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetUnited Way of Matanuska-Susitna Borough: $20,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetMat-Su 2024 Arctic Winter Games Hos: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCoalition for Susitna Dam Alternatives: $8,200 over 1y, 4.7% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 14.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rasmuson FoundationAK35.3× affinity15 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rasmuson Foundation · Valley Hospital Association Inc Dba Mat-Su Health Foundation · The Alaska Community Foundation · Mta Foundation Inc · Matanuska Electric Association Charitable Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Mat-Su Trails & Parks Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mat-Su Trails & Parks Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Mat-Su Trails & Parks Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Mat-Su Trails & Parks Foundation

How much does Mat-Su Trails & Parks Foundation give?
Mat-Su Trails & Parks Foundation reported 12 grants totaling $672,752 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 7 and 12 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Mat-Su Trails & Parks Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2025, its largest causes are Recreation & Sports (59%), Environment (11%), Public Benefit (8%).
Who are Mat-Su Trails & Parks Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2025: Alaska Trails ($348k), Hatcher Alpine Xperience ($210k), Valley Mountain Bikers and Hikers ($163k).
Does Mat-Su Trails & Parks Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Mat-Su Trails & Parks Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Rasmuson Foundation, Valley Hospital Association Inc Dba Mat-Su Health Foundation, The Alaska Community Foundation.
Where is Mat-Su Trails & Parks Foundation based?
Mat-Su Trails & Parks Foundation is based in AK.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mat-Su Trails & Parks’ filings →

More from the funding graph