· Public charity
Matanuska Electric Association Charitable Foundation
Operation RoundUp is a member supported program that allows our membership to round their bill to the nearest dollar each month.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of Matanuska Electric Association Charitable Foundation’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 18 grants below total $158,270 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $214,886 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $56,616 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $68k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $90k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Chugiak Volunteer Fire & Resc | $10,000 |
| Girl Scouts of Alaska | $10,000 |
| Mat-Su Services for Children | $10,000 |
| Hatcher Pass Avalanche Center | $10,000 |
| Battle Dawgs | $10,000 |
| Connect Mat-Su | $10,000 |
| Great Alaska Boy Scouts | $10,000 |
| Denali Nordic Ski Club Inc | $10,000 |
| The Childrens Place | $10,000 |
| 995 The Pass The Peoples | $9,860 |
| Boys & Girls Club of SC AK | $8,265 |
| Alaska Peace Officers Assoc | $8,000 |
| Palmer Volunteer Firemens | $7,785 |
| MatSu Youth Housing | $7,500 |
| Kids Kupboard | $6,960 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 34% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $102k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VHVALLEY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC DBA MAT-SU HEALTH FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $28k · revenue -4%
- HAHATCHER ALPINE XPERIENCE2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue +268%
- 9T995 The Pass The Peoples2× · 2023–2024 · $19k
Funded once
- DFDenali Family Servicesone grant, 2023 · $14k · revenue +3%
- FOFriends of Eagle River Nature Centerone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +3%
- PAPalmer Arts Councilgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +37%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide access, facilities, recreation, and educational opportunities within the alpine environment of Chugach State Park.
Challenge Alaska improves the lives of people with disabilities, their families, and the community through adaptive sports, therapeutic recreation, and education.
To provide comprehensive mental health and primary care services in the Matanuska-Susitna Borough. The Organization operates mental health-related clinics and a Primary Health Care Clinic.
Maintain and groom over non-motorized trails in the Homer area for skiing, snowshoeing, and hiking. Sponsor ski events and facilitate programssuch as public school sports
Building partnerships, building trails. Working to build trails across the state and build capacity for trail organizations.
Provide public transportation to the matanuska-susitna community.
To finding and doing basic medical to people lost or have perished in the wilderness. Our goal is to bring people home safely!
To assist low income individuals and families with housing and housing improvements in Alaska.
Katmai Conservancy supports the preservation of Katmai National Park and Preserve its unique ecosystems scenic character and associated natural and cultural resources by promoting greater public interest appreciation and support through…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alaska State Fair Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Legion Post 35. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VALLEY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC DBA MAT-SU HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HATCHER ALPINE XPERIENCE ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF ALASKA ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S PLACE ↗
- Who funds HATCHER PASS AVALANCHE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CURRY RIDGE RIDERS INC ↗
- Who funds Denali Family Services ↗
- Who funds Friends of Eagle River Nature Center ↗
- Who funds Palmer Arts Council ↗
- Who funds Chugiak Volunteer Fire & Rescue Company ↗
- Who funds Battle Dawgs ↗
- Who funds Mat-Su Services for Children & Adults Inc ↗
- Who funds Denali Nordic Ski Club Inc ↗
- Who funds The Last Frontier Honor Flight ↗
- Who funds ALASKA STATE FAIR INC ↗
- Who funds Set Free Alaska Inc ↗
- Who funds HEARTREACH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MAT-SU 2024 ARCTIC WINTER GAMES HOS ↗
- Who funds VALLEY COMMUNITY FOR RECYCLING SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds 610 Great Alaska Council ↗
- Who funds The August Foundation for Alaska Racing Dogs ↗
- Who funds CCS Early Learning ↗
- Who funds ALASKA'S HEALING HEARTS ↗
- Who funds THE GREAT LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds BEACON HILL ↗
- Who funds LOVE INC OF EAGLE RIVER ↗
- Who funds Access Alaska Inc ↗
- Who funds Palmer Museum of History and Art ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Southcentral Alaska ↗
- Who funds ALASKA PEACE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Matsu Ski Club ↗
- Who funds MAT-SU YOUTH HOUSING ↗
- Who funds ENGINE 557 RESTORATION COMPANY ↗
- Who funds Kids Kupboard ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rasmuson Foundation · Valley Hospital Association Inc Dba Mat-Su Health Foundation · The Alaska Community Foundation · Mta Foundation Inc · United Way of Matanuska-Susitna Borough · Mat-Su Trails & Parks Foundation · Richard L and Diane M Block Foundation · Alaska Children's Trust · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Jim and Vicki Jansen Foundation · Global Credit Union Foundation · United Way of Anchorage
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Matanuska Electric Association Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Matanuska Electric Association Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Matanuska Electric Association Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.