Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Master Builders Association of King and Snohomish Counties

To promote and protect the viability of the home building industry.

$79k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
0168% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Education$175kCommunity Improvement$150kHousing & Shelter$97kCrime & Legal$70kHuman Services$22kHealth$6kOther$250k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $60,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $78,871 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $18,871 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$45M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WELD SEATTLE$40,000
BELLWETHER HOUSING$10,000
SAWHORSE REVOLUTION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%YOUTHCARE: $15k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$646k · 10 repeat orgs$124k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$646k
$114k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+30%

Still filing today

80%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SR
    Sawhorse Revolution
    7× · 2017–2024 · $85k · revenue +308%
  • WS
    WELD SEATTLE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $70k · revenue +53%
  • RT
    REBUILDING TOGETHER SEATTLE
    3× · 2017–2020 · $65k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • HB
    HAWAII BUILDING INDUSTRY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -78%
  • Y
    YOUTHCARE
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -3%
  • SC
    SEATTLE COLLEGES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -35%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
House Our Neighbors

House Our Neighbors envisions a future where all people can afford to live and thrive in vibrant, cohesive, and climate resilient communities. To achieve this, we develop, advocate, and mobilize for policy to realize social housing for the…

2
Housing Connector

Housing connector partners with property owners and managers to lower barriers to housing and increase our region's affordable housing capacity.

Housing & Shelter
3
Washington Housing Alliance Action Fund

The Washington Housing Alliance Action Fund elects candidates, educates voters and decision-makers, and amplifies the voices and priorities of people and communities most impacted by housing instability and homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
4
Welcome Home Coalition

Welcome Home is a diverse coalition in the Portland metropolitan region that uses its collective resources to create healthy communities by ensuring everyone has an affordable and stable home. We use community education and collaboration…

Community Improvement
5
Skagit Habitat for Humanity

The organization partners with hard working people in need of affordable housing, by building and renovating houses in an effort to develop permanent, affordable homes for low income families within Skagit County. We also provide volunteer…

6
Housing Development Consortium of Seattle - King County

Promote the long-term availability of affordable housing to low-income persons.

Housing & Shelter
7
Habitat for Humanity - Spokane

Seeking to put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. Habitat for Humanity-Spokane adheres to a…

Housing & Shelter
8
The Seattle Chapter American Institute of Archite

We champion the central role of architects in creating and sustaining a better built environment.

9
Tenants Union of Washington

The mission of the Tenants Union (TU) is to create housing justice through empowerment-based education, outreach, leadership development, organizing, and advocacy.

10
Building Changes

Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…

Health
11
Home Court Nw
Recreation & Sports
12
Habitat for Humanity of Snohomish County

Habitat for humanity snohomish county strives to eliminate substandard housing and end the cycle of poverty by partnering with homeowners to build, repair, and preserve decent and affordable homes in our neighborhoods. with support from…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Housing Hope and the most unlike its peers is Sawhorse Revolution. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REBUILDING TOGETHER SEATTLE — $64,736 · OtherREBUILDING TOGETHER SEATTLEHABITAT FOR HUMANITY SEATTLE-KING COUNTY — $60,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY SEATTLE-KING CO…UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $54,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONNORTH SEATTLE COLLEGE — $25,000 · OtherNORTH SEATTLE COLLEGEATTAIN HOUSING — $20,000 · OtherATTAIN HOUSINGHOMEAID PUGET SOUND — $11,000 · OtherBELLWETHER HOUSING — $10,000 · Other+1 more — $5,275 · OtherSawhorse Revolution — $85,000 · EducationSawhorse RevolutionHAWAII BUILDING INDUSTRY FOUNDATION — $50,000 · EducationHAWAII BUILDING INDUSTRY …UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $25,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON …SEATTLE COLLEGES FOUNDATION — $15,000 · EducationSEATTLE COLLEGES FOUNDATI…THE CENTER FOR HOUSING ECONOMICS — $150,000 · Community ImprovementTHE CENTER FOR HOUSING…HOUSING HOPE — $92,041 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING HOPESolid Ground Washington — $5,250 · Housing & ShelterSolid Ground W…WELD SEATTLE — $70,000 · Crime & LegalWELD SEATT…YOUTHCARE — $15,000 · Human ServicesHOPELINK — $7,000 · Human ServicesDowntown Emergency Service Center — $5,750 · Health
Other$250,011Education$175,000Community Improvement$150,000Housing & Shelter$97,291Crime & Legal$70,000Human Services$22,000Health$5,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CENTER FOR HOUSING ECONOMICS — $150,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetHOUSING HOPE — $92,041 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSawhorse Revolution — $85,000 over 7y, 6.2% of budgetWELD SEATTLE — $70,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER SEATTLE — $64,736 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY SEATTLE-KING COUNTY — $60,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII BUILDING INDUSTRY FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetATTAIN HOUSING — $20,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetYOUTHCARE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE COLLEGES FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOMEAID PUGET SOUND — $11,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetBELLWETHER HOUSING — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPELINK — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDowntown Emergency Service Center — $5,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSolid Ground Washington — $5,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA18.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · Washington Federal Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Credit Unions in the State of Washington · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · United Way of King County · Gates Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Master Builders Association of King and Snohomish Counties funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph