Skip to content

· Private foundation

Masonic Foundation of Wilmette

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$66k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$165kArts & Culture$63kHuman Services$24kMembership Benefit$24kHealth$11kYouth Development$9kReligion$5kPublic Benefit$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $50k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILMETT EVANSTON LODGE 524$49,999
ILLINOIS MASONIC OUTREACH SERVICES$3,155
Individual grant recipient$3,000
ILLINOIS MASONIC FOUND FOR THE PRE$3,000
DISABLED PATRIOT FUND INC$2,000
SOCIETY OF KING SOLOMON$1,000
ROYAL ARCH MASONS OF ILLINOIS(EVANS$1,000
FRIENDSHIP ASSEMBLY 100$1,000
124 AUGUSTUS N GAGE COUNCIL$1,000
PRO SE FAMILY FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE FATHERS RIGHTS MOVEMENT: $500 → 10%ILLINOIS MASONIC OUTREACH SERVICES: $9k → 11%ILLINOIS MASONIC OUTREACH SERVICES: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ID
IL
NY
OH
NJ
DC
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$210k · 7 repeat orgs$111k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +322% since the first grant, against -27% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
15

Total granted

$210k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+322%
-27%

Still filing today

29%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WP
    WILMETTE PARK LODGE 931
    5× · 2020–2024 · $165k
  • IM
    ILLINOIS MASONIC OUTREACH SERVICES
    2× · 2024–2025 · $12k · revenue +322%
  • GU
    GLENVIEW UNITED LODGE 1058
    2× · 2023–2024 · $12k

Funded once

  • KO
    KING OSCAR 855
    one grant, 2023 · $13k
  • IM
    ILLINOIS MASONIC STUDENT ASSISTANCE
    one grant, 2024 · $9k
  • I
    IMSAP
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Illinois Fatherhood Initiative
Youth Development
2
The M46 Revolution Inc

The vision of operation m46 is to ignite a revolution. the definition of a revolution is the physical overthrow of a current social order. the current social order is not only characterized by fatherless homes but also visionless homes…

Religion
3
The Fatherhood Encouragement Project
Religion
4
Welcome to Fatherhood Inc

Organization was established to assist fathers with the stresses and pressures of parenting.

Human Services
5
Power of Dad Ministries

Promote the father's importance in raising children in the family

Religion
6
I Broke the Cycle

Create and help a community of fathers

—
7
Dads Evoking Change

Organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide support to low income fathers as they navigate child custody and child support processes.

Human Services
8
Fathers Organization

Fathers Organizations primary purpose was to help disenfranchised fathers reconnect with their kids and families. Upon doing this we provided mentoring, job readiness, job placement, child support help, education services, as well as drug…

Employment
9
Empowering the Fatherless Inc

Empowering fatherless folks through education and training

Human Services
10
Fathers Making Progress Inc

Our movement services families primarily through creating spaces of learning, support, and growth for fathers. the fathers we help become integral parts of their family and their communities. fmp works to ensure that fathers have pathways…

Human Services
11
Fathers Help Network Inc
Philanthropy
12
4FATHERS

Work with mens to promote healthy romance and fatherhood

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Illinois Masonic Outreach Services; the most unlike its peers is The Fathers Rights Movement. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
1/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WILMETTE PARK LODGE 931: $164,700 · OtherWILMETTE PARK LODGE 931WILMETT EVANSTON LODGE 524: $49,999 · OtherWILMETT EVANSTON LODGE 524KING OSCAR 855: $13,377 · OtherGLENVIEW UNITED LODGE 1058: $11,500 · Other+20 more: $66,500 · Other+20 moreILLINOIS MASONIC OUTREACH SERVICES: $12,121 · Human ServicesThe Fathers Rights Movement: $500 · Human ServicesRAZOM INC: $2,000 · International
Other$306,076Human Services$12,621International$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetILLINOIS MASONIC OUTREACH SERVICES: $12,121 over 2y, 21% of budgetDISABLED PATRIOT FUND INC: $8,340 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetTHE WARMING HOUSE YOUTH CENTER: $2,840 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetHOPE CHICAGO INC: $2,840 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAZOM INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL ORDER OF THE RAINBOW: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Fathers Rights Movement: $500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFathering Together: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ILLINOIS MASONIC OUTREACH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED PATRIOT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WARMING HOUSE YOUTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HOPE CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds RAZOM INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL ORDER OF THE RAINBOW ↗
  • Who funds The Fathers Rights Movement ↗
  • Who funds Fathering Together ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Masonic Foundation of Wilmette funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Masonic Foundation of Wilmette. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Masonic Foundation of Wilmette?

    Find your warmest path to Masonic Foundation of Wilmette through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Masonic Foundation of Wilmette’s filings →

    More from the funding graph