How much did MASEK FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

MASEK FOUNDATION reported 20 grants totaling $190,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is MASEK FOUNDATION based?

MASEK FOUNDATION is based in NE.

MASEK FOUNDATION

Foundation Dossiers

· Private foundation

MASEK FOUNDATION

This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.

$190k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$25k

Largest

01What you fund

0161% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

International$366kHealth$122kCrime & Legal$106kHuman Services$68kHousing & Shelter$46kReligion$22kOther$458k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

—

2020

—

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

2024

housing

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k14 grants · $82k
$10k–50k6 grants · $109k

$7,000

Median grant

States reached

$4.2M

Total assets

Largest grants

HAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION$25,000
CIRRUS HOUSE$24,000
AMOS HEALTH & HOPE$17,000
POTTERS WHEEL INC$16,500
BETHLEHEM HOLY CHILD PROGRAM CORP$14,000
FOOD FOR THE POOR$12,000
UN MUNDO$9,000
SCOTTS BLUFF COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUM$8,500
WELLSPRING HARDSHIP FUND$8,000
ABRAHAM PROJECT INC$7,000
ST FRANCIS MISSION$7,000
CHILD AID FBO FUNDIT$7,000
HOSPITAL ATITLAN$7,000
SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE$6,000
MATT TALBOT KITCHEN & OUTREACH$6,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 27% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.2M · 22 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.2M

$18k

Still filing today

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

InternationalHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesHealthCrime & LegalReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

HH
HAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION
8× · 2017–2024 · $162k · revenue +42%
AH
AMOS HEALTH & HOPE
8× · 2017–2024 · $122k · revenue +31%
PW
POTTERS WHEEL INC
8× · 2017–2024 · $106k · revenue +134%

Funded once

OT
OREGON TRAIL FOUNDATION
one grant, 2021 · $15k
SV
ST VINCENT DE PAUL PANTRY
one grant, 2017 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

St Francis House

Empowering families with chidren to achieve permanent and stable self-sufficiency by providing case management; nutritious meals; and educational, health and career resources; in a safe and secure environment.

Housing & Shelter

Habitat for Humanity of St Joseph

Habitat brings people together to build homes, community and hope. we build strength, stability, and self-reliance through shelter. our vision is a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter

St Francis-St Joseph Catholic Worker House

We strive to provide hospitality to homeless men. We recognize that God created each human being with great dignity and respect. The community of those who live and work here at SFSJCWH desire to uphold this principle and serve our guests…

—

Hartford Catholic Worker Inc

The mission of Hartford Catholic Worker is to practice the works of mercy. We do this through our work with children and families in our neighborhood, helping to make sure the hungry are fed and helping secure housing for the homeless.

International

St Francis House of Sioux Falls

Ecumenical not-for-profit transitional living facility for the homeless in sioux falls, south dakota. purpose is to offer hospitality, fellowship and support to those who have nowhere to sleep.

—

Children of the Fathers House

To improve lives for people in poverty or hardship

Human Services

Habitat for Humanity

Our mission is to provide decent and affordable housing to eligible families in partnership with god, the families and our community.

—

Catholic Worker Hospitality House

Catholic Worker HospitalityHouse serves the needs of homeless and low-income individuals through the following programs: free dining room five mornings a week, year-round homeless shelter, three low-income permanent housing units, and a…

Human Services

Florence House Housing Corp

Provide housing and temporary shelter for homeless persons.

Housing & Shelter

Sean Humphrey House

To optimize the quality of life for low income individuals living with hiv or aids, who may also suffer from other diseases and disabilities and who are unable to live independently.

Unclassified

Martin House Inc

The mission of Martin House, Inc. is to provide a nurturing community where individuals of limited income who have been alone, alienated, fearful, and dispossessed can develop healthy relationships, new dignity, and a renewed life. Our…

Health

Habitat for Humanity of

To provide housing to low and very low income families that qualify.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc and the most unlike its peers is St Francis Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

12/12

Grantees still filing

9/12

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$458,000International$365,500Health$121,500Crime & Legal$106,000Human Services$68,000Housing & Shelter$46,000Religion$22,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MASEK FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: POTTERS WHEEL INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~2 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.3× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 470723071 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on POTTERS WHEEL INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 6% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Masek Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Masek Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MASEK FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Masek Foundation?

More from the funding graph

MASEK FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Masek Foundation?

More from the funding graph