Skip to content

· Private foundation

Maryjane Carr Scholarship Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$181kHealth$16kEmployment$2kRecreation & Sports$2k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$415k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JACKSON COLLEGE$8,000
GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY$7,650
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN COLLEGE OF LSA$2,000
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$2,000
SCHOOLCRAFT COLLEGE$2,000
CLEARY UNIVERSITY$2,000
SPRING ARBOR UNIVERSITY$1,850
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$82k · 8 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
61

Total granted

$82k
$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+8%

Still filing today

38%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JACKSON COLLEGE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $27k
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    3× · 2022–2024 · $16k · revenue +92%
  • MS
    MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2021–2025 · $11k

Funded once

  • FS
    FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
2
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
3
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
4
Excelsior University

Excelsior University provides educational opportunity to adult learners with an emphasis on those historically underrepresented in higher education. The University meets students where they are - academically and geographically, offering…

Education
5
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
6
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
7
Arizona Christian University

Arizona christian university provides a biblically-integrated, liberal arts education equipping graduates to serve the lord jesus christ in all aspects of life, as leaders of influence and excellence.

Education
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
Calvin University

The mission of calvin university is to equip students to think deeply, to act justly, and to live wholeheartedly as christ's agents of renewal in the world.

Education
10
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
11
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
12
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Albion College; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JACKSON COLLEGE: $26,600 · OtherJACKSON COLLEGEUniversity of Michigan: $15,650 · OtherUniversity of MichiganMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $11,100 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYGRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $10,950 · OtherGRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY+62 more: $115,200 · Other+62 moreSpring Arbor University: $5,150 · EducationSpring Arbo…ALBION COLLEGE: $3,450 · EducationALBION COLL…ADRIAN COLLEGE: $3,450 · EducationADRIAN COLL…CLEARY UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationCLEARY UNIV…University of Notre Dame du Lac: $1,850 · EducationUniversity …HOPE COLLEGE: $1,800 · EducationHOPE COLLEG…Grand Canyon University: $1,650 · EducationGrand Canyo…Northwood University: $1,650 · EducationNorthwood U…
Other$179,500Education$21,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Michigan: $15,650 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetSpring Arbor University: $5,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALBION COLLEGE: $3,450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetADRIAN COLLEGE: $3,450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLEARY UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $1,850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE COLLEGE: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGrand Canyon University: $1,650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwood University: $1,650 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds Spring Arbor University ↗
  • Who funds ALBION COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ADRIAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CLEARY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds HOPE COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Myer & Lois Franklin Charitable TrMI15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Myer & Lois Franklin Charitable Tr · The Alvin L Glick Foundation · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Maryjane Carr Scholarship Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Maryjane Carr Scholarship Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Maryjane Carr Scholarship’s filings →

    More from the funding graph