Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary Ratrie Wick Family Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2021
19
Grants FY2021
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Environment$526kScience & Tech$25kReligion$24kEducation$14kHealth$14kArts & Culture$6kHuman Services$3kCommunity Improvement$800Other$0
02FY2021 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$46k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRACE AND HOLY TRINITY CHURCH$5,600
SCIENCE MUSEUM OF VA$5,000
LEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN$5,000
MASSEY CANCER CENTER$2,500
CLAY CENTER$1,500
VIRGINIA MUSEUM FOUNDATION$600
PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER$500
CAPITAL TREES$500
VIRGINIA HOME$500
WEST VIRGINIA BOTANICAL GARDEN$500
MAYMONT FOUNDATION$500
RVA 1004100$200
ST CHRISTOPHER'S SCHOOL$200
Individual grant recipient$200
HISTORIC RICHMOND FOUNDATION$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $500 → 9%PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$611k · 25 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against +60% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2021, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
10

Total granted

$611k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+60%

Still filing today

56%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $300 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
EnvironmentEducationHealthArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LG
    LEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $521k · revenue +67%
  • MF
    MAYMONT FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $3k · revenue +122%
  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA BOTANIC GARDEN INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $3k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +99%
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2017 · $500
  • RP
    RICHMOND PERFORMING ARTS
    one grant, 2017 · $200
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Valentine Museum

The mission of the valentine is to engage, educate and challenge a diverse audience by collecting, preserving and interpreting richmond's history.

Arts & Culture
2
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
3
Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation

The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…

Health
4
Jenkins Arboretum & Gardens

The mission of the jenkins arboretum & gardens is to preserve natural, tranquil woodlands for community enjoyment, to showcase native plants and a world class collection of rhododendrons and azaleas, and to promote environmental…

Environment
5
Jefferson Scholars Foundation

The jefferson scholars foundation (foundation) provides academic merit-based scholarship, fellowship and professorship support to students and faculty at the university of virginia (uva).

Philanthropy
6
William & Mary Foundation

The William & Mary Foundation advances the university's highest aspirations by securing private support, guiding a multi-asset investment portfolio, and offering strategic leadership. In this work, we propel the university toward national…

Education
7
Virginia Wesleyan University

Virginia wesleyan university is a fully accredited liberal arts, united-methodist related institution founded in 1961.

—
8
Association for the Preservation of Va Antiquities

To preserve, promote and serve as an advocate for virginia's irreplaceable historic places for cultural, economic and educational benefits for everyone.

Arts & Culture
9
Virginia Living Museum Inc

The museum connects people to nature by delivering educational classes, programs, exhibits, events and demonstrations. staff and volunteers engage learners of all ages on a 23 acre campus setting. indoor and outdoor learning opportunities…

Arts & Culture
10
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
11
University of Virginia Law School Foundation

The university of virginia law school foundation's primary purpose is to receive, manage and expend funds for the benefit of the university of virginia school of law.

Education
12
Groundwork Rva Inc

Mission: to cultivate the next generation of urban conservationists in richmond, virginia. vision: groundwork rva works with richmond youth to increase environmental, economic, and social well-being in neighborhoods by transforming…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Historic Richmond Foundation; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $520,650 · EnvironmentLEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INC+4 more: $5,200 · EnvironmentSCIENCE MUSEUM OF VA: $25,375 · OtherSCIENCE MUSEUM…GRACE AND HOLY TRINITY CHURCH: $23,750 · OtherGRACE AND HOLY…MASSEY CANCER CENTER: $10,125 · OtherMASSEY CANCER …CLAY CENTER: $7,500 · OtherCLAY CENTERVIRGINIA MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $2,900 · Other+13 more: $6,225 · Other+13 moreTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC: $1,570 · EducationST CHRISTOPHER'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationOLDFIELDS SCHOOL INC: $600 · EducationTHE JEMICY SCHOOL INC: $600 · Education+2 more: $150 · EducationThe Virginia Home: $2,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $200 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthMAYMONT FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC RICHMOND FOUNDATION: $600 · Arts & CulturePETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF RICHMOND VIRGINIA INC: $800 · Community ImprovementRICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $50 · Animals
Environment$525,850Other$75,875Education$3,920Health$3,300Arts & Culture$3,100Human Services$1,000Community Improvement$800Animals$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $520,650 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetMAYMONT FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA BOTANIC GARDEN INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCAPITAL TREES: $2,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetThe Virginia Home: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC: $1,570 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST CHRISTOPHER'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF RICHMOND VIRGINIA INC: $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOLDFIELDS SCHOOL INC: $600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEMICY SCHOOL INC: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRICHMOND MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHISTORIC RICHMOND FOUNDATION: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BALDWIN SCHOOL: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTERING ARMS CORPORATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GARDEN CLUB OF VIRGINIA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PENNSYLVANIA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYMONT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA BOTANIC GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL TREES ↗
  • Who funds The Virginia Home ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ST CHRISTOPHER'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF RICHMOND VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds OLDFIELDS SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEMICY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds RICHMOND MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC RICHMOND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds THE BALDWIN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERING ARMS CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GARDEN CLUB OF VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PENNSYLVANIA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds RICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THREE CHOPT GARDEN CLUB ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Richard S Reynolds FoundationVA22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Richard S Reynolds Foundation · The Community Foundation Inc · The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation · Tesco Foundation · Carmax Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · The Capa Foundation · Massey Family Foundation · The Beirne Carter Foundation · Luck Companies Foundation · Robins Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary Ratrie Wick Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary Ratrie Wick Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mary Ratrie Wick Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph