Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary R Ramseur Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$15kHealth$12kFood & Nutrition$7kReligion$6kInternational$1kScience & Tech$1kHousing & Shelter$1kPhilanthropy$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$750
Median grant
1
States reached
$141k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,000
CLEO BAILY EXPERIMENT$1,000
ANDERSON COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS$1,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$1,000
SOUTH MAIN CHAPEL AND MERCY CENTER$1,000
CANCER ASSN OF ANDERSON$1,000
ANDERSON INTERFAITH MINISTRIES$1,000
HOPE MISSIONS$750
THE LOT PROJECT$750
FIRST LIGHT$500
WESTSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER$500
THE CHAMPIONS CENTER$500
Individual grant recipient$500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$250
Individual grant recipient$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%ANDERSON AREA YMCA: $500 → 15%WESTSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 15%ANDERSON INTERFAITH MINISTRIES: $1k → 15%ANDERSON INTERFAITH MINISTRIES: $1k → 15%ANDERSON INTERFAITH MINISTRIES: $1k → 15%WESTSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER: $500 → 15%THE CHAMPIONS CENTER: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$35k · 17 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
15

Total granted

$35k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
0%

Still filing today

47%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthReligionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    ANDERSON INTERFAITH MINISTRIES
    3× · 2020–2025 · $3k · revenue +11%
  • CA
    CANCER ASSOCIATION OF ANDERSON
    4× · 2021–2025 · $3k · revenue +12%
  • TL
    THE LOT PROJECT
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • AI
    ANDERSON INTERFAITH MINISTRIES 292
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +33%
  • SM
    S MAIN CHAPEL AND MERCY CENTER 293
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Anderson County Community Action Inc

The Anderson County Community Action Commission provides food, clothing, household foods, and essential assistance to low-income residents of Anderson County, Tennessee. The organization operates a community food pantry, clothing closet,…

—
2
Anderson Homes Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
3
The Andy Anderson Institute Inc
Philanthropy
4
Tennessee Out-Reach Center for Homeless

Torch offers services to assist the homeless in anderson county. we provide street outreach, rapid rehousing, rapid recover assistance as well as operating a shelter for families with children.

Human Services
5
Crisis Center of Anderson & Cherokee Co

To aid and support victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and child abuse.

Human Services
6
Habitat for Humanity Anderson County

The organization's mission or most significant activities are to build simple, decent, and affordable houses in partnership with income eligible participating families, volunteers, buinesses organizations and faith communities. the houses…

—
7
Carolina Teen Center

Carolina Teen Center is a prevention and education year-round after-school and summer program that services youth and their families. Literacy programs, tutoring, life skills, mentoring, positive peer groups, conflict resolution skills,…

Health
8
York County Council On Aging Inc

York county council on aging's (yccoa) mission is to serve as a focal point for the provision and coordination of a broad range of services and activities for senior adults in york and chester counties, sc. we strive to improve health and…

Human Services
9
Anderson County Child Welfare Board Inc

To meet needs of children who have been abused/neglected or removed from their family home assisting children who have been placed in foster care.

Human Services
10
Anson County Homes of Hope

Provide short-term housing for homeless

Housing & Shelter
11
Anderson Valley Health Center Inc

To provide comprehensive, affordable medical, psychiatric and health-related services to the community's most vulnerable populations, regardless of income.

Health
12
Anderson Impact Center Inc

To provide community services with food services computer services and elderly programs.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Anderson Interfaith Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Hospice of the Upstate Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
5/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ANDERSON COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS: $3,500 · OtherANDERSON COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELSSOUTH MAIN CHAPEL AND MERCY CENTER: $3,000 · OtherSOUTH MAIN CHAPEL AND MERCY CENTERTHE SALVATION ARMY: $3,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientANDERSON INTERFAITH MINISTRIES 292: $2,000 · OtherANDERSON INTERFAITH MINISTRIES 292MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $1,900 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS INCS MAIN CHAPEL AND MERCY CENTER 293: $1,250 · OtherHOPE MISSIONS: $1,250 · OtherHOSPICE OF THE UPSTATE INC: $1,250 · OtherCLEO BAILEY EXPERIMENT: $1,250 · Other+14 more: $9,500 · Other+14 moreANDERSON FREE CLINIC: $6,250 · HealthANDERSON FREE CLINICCANCER ASSOCIATION OF ANDERSON: $2,500 · HealthCANCER ASSOCIATION OF…FIRST LIGHT: $500 · HealthFIRST LIGHTANDERSON INTERFAITH MINISTRIES: $3,000 · Human ServicesANDERSON INTERFA…SAFE HARBOR INC: $1,750 · Human ServicesSAFE HARBOR INCTHE WESTSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesTHE WESTSIDE COM…YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ANDERSON SOUTH CAROLINA: $500 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS CHRIS…THE CHAMPIONS CENTER: $500 · Human ServicesTHE CHAMPIONS CE…THE LOT PROJECT: $1,750 · ReligionFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF MCCORMICK SC INC: $500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$30,400Health$9,250Human Services$7,250Religion$1,750Housing & Shelter$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANDERSON FREE CLINIC: $6,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetANDERSON INTERFAITH MINISTRIES: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER ASSOCIATION OF ANDERSON: $2,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $1,900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAFE HARBOR INC: $1,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOT PROJECT: $1,750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE WESTSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE UPSTATE INC: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ANDERSON SOUTH CAROLINA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST LIGHT: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ANDERSON COUNTY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF MCCORMICK SC INC: $500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHAMPIONS CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANDERSON FREE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds ANDERSON INTERFAITH MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds CANCER ASSOCIATION OF ANDERSON ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HARBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LOT PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THE WESTSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE UPSTATE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ANDERSON SOUTH CAROLINA ↗
  • Who funds FIRST LIGHT ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF ANDERSON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF MCCORMICK SC INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHAMPIONS CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Abney FoundationSC30.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Abney Foundation · Dabo's All in Team Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Sc Josephine Stevenson Trust · The Jim and Betty Young Family Foundation Inc · United Way of Anderson County · The Webbcraft Family Foundation Inc · Ta Gambrill Foundation Ct-Main · Timken Foundation of Canton · Brett Crowe Memorial · Upcountry Fiber Foundation · Sisters of Charity Foundation of South Carolina

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary R Ramseur Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary R Ramseur Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mary R Ramseur Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Mary R Ramseur Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mary R Ramseur’s filings →

    More from the funding graph