Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary Margaret Sullivan Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$86kHuman Services$77kPublic Safety & Disaster$69kInternational$44kFood & Nutrition$37kYouth Development$29kAnimals$25kHousing & Shelter$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$143k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES$5,000
SAINT JUDE CHILDREN RESEARCH HOSPITAL$5,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$5,000
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$5,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$4,000
SAINT VINCENT MEALS ON WHEELS$4,000
SPCA LA$3,000
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$3,000
LOS ANGELES MISSION$3,000
NATIONAL VETERANS FOUNDATION$3,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$3,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$3,000
LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION$2,000
LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 9%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IA
CA
VA
MD
KS
TN
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$388k · 16 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
1

Total granted

$388k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
+94%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalHealthYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +120%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +98%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $30k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • DIRECT RELIEFgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue +94%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
2
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
3
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
4
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
5
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
6
Us Digital Response

U.s. digital response is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that helps governments, nonprofits, and public entities respond quickly to critical public needs. the organization serves the public by leveraging a network of pro bono…

Public Safety & Disaster
7
United Animal Nations Dba Redrover

To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals through emergency sheltering, disaster relief services, financial assistance and education. redrover accomplishes its mission by engaging volunteers and…

—
8
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—
9
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
10
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
11
K9 Hurricane's Heroes Inc

K9 hurricane's heroes, a federally recognized, non-profit organization, provides "retired law enforcement and military dogs" with subsidized veterinary care so they can live a long and healthy life. often these incredible dogs are the…

Animals
12
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Nature Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAINT JUDE CHILDREN RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $40,000 · OtherSAINT JUDE CHILDREN RESEARCH HOSPITALSAINT VINCENT MEALS ON WHEELS: $31,000 · OtherSAINT VINCENT MEALS ON WHEELSCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $26,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESTHE SALVATION ARMY: $25,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYNATIONAL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC: $22,000 · OtherNATIONAL VETERANS FOUNDATION INCLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $8,000 · OtherTAKE THE LEAD INC: $6,000 · Other+1 more: $4,000 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJ…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $27,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Re…LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Human ServicesLOS ANGELES POLICE F…GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR THE…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $40,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SAN…DIRECT RELIEF: $4,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIE…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $40,000 · HealthSHRINERS HO…HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $29,000 · Youth DevelopmentLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterLOS ANGELES SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $25,000 · Animals
Other$162,000Human Services$71,000International$44,000Health$40,000Youth Development$29,000Housing & Shelter$25,000Animals$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $30,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $29,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $27,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $25,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $25,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC: $22,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetLOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTAKE THE LEAD INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TAKE THE LEAD INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary Margaret Sullivan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary Margaret Sullivan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mary Margaret Sullivan’s filings →

More from the funding graph