Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary Lou Lemon Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$594k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$432k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$228kPublic Benefit$70kArts & Culture$69kCommunity Improvement$41kEnvironment$25kInternational$23kHuman Services$21kCrime & Legal$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $432k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$44k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCH OF THE OPEN ARMS$431,608
KGOU$100,000
THE AMERICAN JOURNALISM PROJECT$20,000
ELECTED OFFICIALS TO PROTECT AMERICA$15,000
COULD YOU$10,000
ARTRANDI COMPANY$8,000
OKLAHOMA COALITION TO ABOLISH THE DEATH PENALTY$5,600
THE JUICE RADIO SHOW$2,000
AFRICAN INDIANS OF THE FIVE CIVILIZED TRIBES FOUNDATION$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE PVBLIC FOUNDATION: $13k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
CA
NM
DC
OK
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$947k · 17 repeat orgs$204k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
20

Total granted

$947k
$173k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-8%
0%

Still filing today

29%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureCivil RightsReligionEducationPublic BenefitInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CHURCH OF THE OPEN ARMS
    7× · 2018–2025 · $610k
  • K
    KGOU
    3× · 2023–2025 · $111k
  • EO
    ELECTED OFFICIALS TO PROTECT AMERICA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $35k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $31k
  • BR
    BIOGAS RESEARCHERS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • AP
    AMERICAN POPS ORCHESTRA
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Partnership for Participatory International Policy

Partnership for Participatory International Policy coordinates opportunities for elected officials, staff and community leaders to learn from people impacted by US foreign policies and practices. We do this by organizing delegations to…

Civil Rights
2
World Pulse Voices

World Pulse is a global social impact network connecting women from 227 countries to accelerate social change. We provide a safe and supportive online space where women can speak for themselves, make powerful connections, and access the…

Human Services
3
Out & Equal

To provide leadership and professional development, education and research to create workplaces free from discrimination.

Social Science
4
Peace Is Loud Inc

Pil amplifies the stories the world needs now. through their speakers bureau film impact work, they connect peoples desire for change with opportunities for dialogue action. pil harnesses the power of storytelling by women, trans nonbinary…

Civil Rights
5
Polis Institute Inc

To champion human dignity by designing the solutions to the social problems that infringe upon it.

Religion
6
Legal Voice

Legal voice was founded on the belief that all women, girls, and lgbtq+ people should be able to live their lives with dignity, safety, and autonomy. we advance justice and build community power by using multiple strategies: litigation,…

Crime & Legal
7
Vital Voices Global Partnership Inc

Vital voices global partnership's mission is to identify, invest in and bring visibility to extraordinary women around the world by unleashing their leadership potential to transform lives and accelerate peace and prosperity in their…

International
8
The Pipeline Fund

The Pipeline Fund is working toward a reflective democracy where skilled, diverse, community leaders are fully supported to run for office, run campaigns, and advance progressive policies that address the urgent needs of all Americans.

—
9
The Conversationalist
—
10
Population Action International

Pai advances evidence, policies and programs to enable women, youth and at-risk communities to access sexual and reproductive health as core to health equity, climate resilience, economic well-being and gender equality.

Health
11
The Voice Project Inc

The organization's mission is

—
12
Project Diva

Project DIVA International is here to ensure girls' needs are met. We exist to guide girls to self-discover towards results - to think, find alignment with their truth, and financially successful.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sally's List. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
4/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHURCH OF THE OPEN ARMS: $610,358 · OtherCHURCH OF THE OPEN ARMSKGOU: $110,500 · OtherKGOUELECTED OFFICIALS TO PROTECT AMERICA: $35,000 · Other+30 more: $264,250 · Other+30 moreAMERICAN JOURNALISM PROJECT INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE: $13,000 · Arts & CultureVOICE Education Fund: $27,450 · ReligionDONA ANA VILLAGE ASSOCIATION: $20,000 · Community ImprovementCOULD YOU: $20,000 · InternationalTREVOR PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsLGBTQ Victory Institute Inc: $6,000 · Civil RightsSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $15,000 · Environment
Other$1,020,108Arts & Culture$33,000Religion$27,450Community Improvement$20,000International$20,000Civil Rights$16,000Environment$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVOICE Education Fund: $27,450 over 5y, 14% of budgetAMERICAN POPS ORCHESTRA: $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCOULD YOU: $20,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE: $13,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetPVBLIC FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPHILLIPS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY CORPORATION: $11,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLGBTQ Victory Institute Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEDUCATION AND RECREATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSALLY'S LIST: $250 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VOICE Education Fund ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN POPS ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JOURNALISM PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds DONA ANA VILLAGE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds COULD YOU ↗
  • Who funds Congressional Chorus ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE ↗
  • Who funds PVBLIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIPS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds LGBTQ Victory Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION AND RECREATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO3.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary Lou Lemon Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary Lou Lemon Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mary Lou Lemon Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Mary Lou Lemon Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mary Lou Lemon’s filings →

    More from the funding graph