Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary K and Clifford Grum Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$163k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$26MEducation$24MHealth$4.5MReligion$2.3MYouth Development$1.6MHousing & Shelter$275kAnimals$228kHuman Services$149kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$100,000
WINNIE BERRY HUMANE SOCIETY$62,890
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%BACKSIDE BENEVOLENCE FUND: $4k → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%BACKSIDE BENEVOLENCE FUND: $2k → 13%BACKSIDE BENEVOLENCE FUND: $1k → 13%HOSPICE IN THE PINES: $15k → 16%HOSPICE IN THE PINES: $5k → 16%HOSPICE IN THE PINES: $3k → 16%HOSPICE IN THE PINES: $1k → 16%MOSAIC CENTER: $5k → 16%MOSAIC CENTER: $3k → 16%MOSAIC CENTER: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
OH
PA
KY
MD
TN
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$59M · 23 repeat orgs$481k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
18

Total granted

$59M
$481k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+55%

Still filing today

65%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationInternationalAnimalsHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    SAINT LUKES FOUNDATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +37%
  • CC
    CHO-YEH CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +102%
  • LN
    LUFKIN NEIGHBORHOOD STRONG
    4× · 2020–2023 · $250k · revenue +275%

Funded once

  • PA
    PAN-AFRICAN ACADEMY OF CHRISTIAN SURGEONSgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue +55%
  • AC
    ANGELINA COLLEGE CENTER FOR NONPROF
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • JG
    JANELLE GRUM FAMILY CRISIS CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lubbock Christian University

Lubbock christian university is a christ-centered, academic community of learners, transforming the hearts, minds, and hands of students for lives of purpose and service.

Education
2
Lou Engle Ministries

Advancing the kingdom of god through prayer,preaching and teaching.

Religion
3
The King's University

The King's University integrates Biblical education and practical ministry to shape Spirit-formed individuals who follow Jesus, serve His Church, and are sent to impact the world.

Education
4
Hospice of South Texas Inc

Hospice care of terminally ill patients

—
5
The King's University

The King's University integrates Biblical education and practical ministry to shape Spirit-formed individuals who follow Jesus, serve His Church, and are sent to impact the world.

Education
6
East Texas Baptist University

East texas baptist university (etbu) was founded in 1912 as a fully accredited institution of higher education. affiliated with the baptist general convention of texas, etbu educates students by integrating biblical faith and learning to…

Education
7
Hospice Longview Inc Dba Hearts Way Hospice of Northeast Tx

Care for the terminally ill

Human Services
8
Catholic Leadership Institute

Catholic leadership institute provides bishops, priests,religious, deacons and lay persons in the roman catholic church with world-class, pastoral leadership formation and consulting services that strengthen their confidence and competence…

Religion
9
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
10
Luther Classical College

Luther classical college educates lutherans in the classical, lutheran tradition and prepares them for godly vocations within family, church, and society, fostering christian culture through study of the best of our western heritage.

Education
11
Criswell College

The mission of criswell college is to provide ministerial and professional higher education for men and women preparing to serve as christian leaders throughout society, while maintaining an institutional commitment to biblical inerrancy.

Education
12
The Woodlands Christian Academy

TWCA is an independent, Christ-centered college preparatory school that integrates learning with biblical faith and challenges our students to reach their highest potential - intellectually, creatively, physically, and socially - for the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thoroughbred Retirement Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Saint Lukes Foundation of Cleveland Ohio. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEDICAL BENEVOLENCE FOUNDATION: $26,164,959 · InternationalMEDICAL BENEVOLENCE FOUNDATION+2 more: $210,000 · InternationalAUSTIN COLLEGE: $23,036,272 · EducationAUSTIN COLLEGE+3 more: $26,000 · EducationFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $2,268,250 · OtherFIRST PRES…SAINT LUKE'S FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 · OtherSAINT LUKE…PAN-AFRICAN ACADEMY OF CHRISTIAN SU: $457,400 · OtherPAN-AFRICA…+25 more: $676,150 · Other+25 moreSAINT LUKES FOUNDATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO: $2,500,000 · HealthCHO-YEH CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTER INC: $1,625,000 · Youth DevelopmentLUFKIN NEIGHBORHOOD STRONG: $250,000 · Housing & ShelterTHOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC: $121,000 · Animals+2 more: $2,500 · Animals
International$26,374,959Education$23,062,272Other$5,401,800Health$2,500,000Youth Development$1,625,000Housing & Shelter$250,000Animals$123,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDICAL BENEVOLENCE FOUNDATION: $26,164,959 over 7y, 83% of budgetAUSTIN COLLEGE: $23,036,272 over 6y, 17% of budgetSAINT LUKES FOUNDATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO: $2,500,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetCHO-YEH CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTER INC: $1,625,000 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetLUFKIN NEIGHBORHOOD STRONG: $250,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetPAN-AFRICAN ACADEMY OF CHRISTIAN SURGEONS: $200,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetTHOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC: $121,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetHOSPICE IN THE PINES INC: $23,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetThe Kinkaid School Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE WALKS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MOSAIC CENTER INC: $8,500 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetBackside Benevolence Fund Inc: $6,000 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetLUFKIN ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetTLL TEMPLE MEMORIAL LIBRARY & ARCHIVES: $3,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of East Texas: $3,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHOCKADAY SCHOOL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ELLEN TROUT ZOO INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKentucky Race Track Chaplaincy Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRETIRED RACEHORSE PROJECT LTD: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF LUFKIN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDICAL BENEVOLENCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SAINT LUKES FOUNDATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO ↗
  • Who funds CHO-YEH CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LUFKIN NEIGHBORHOOD STRONG ↗
  • Who funds PAN-AFRICAN ACADEMY OF CHRISTIAN SURGEONS ↗
  • Who funds THOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE IN THE PINES INC ↗
  • Who funds The Kinkaid School Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOPE WALKS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MOSAIC CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Backside Benevolence Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds LUFKIN ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TLL TEMPLE MEMORIAL LIBRARY & ARCHIVES ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Museum of East Texas ↗
  • Who funds HOCKADAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ELLEN TROUT ZOO INC ↗
  • Who funds Kentucky Race Track Chaplaincy Inc ↗
  • Who funds RETIRED RACEHORSE PROJECT LTD ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF LUFKIN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Brookshire Brothers Charitable FoundationTX15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Brookshire Brothers Charitable Foundation · Ernest L Kurth Jr Charitable Foundation · The Bettye & Murphy George Foundation · The Pineywoods Foundation · Tll Temple Foundation · Hunter Family Charitable Foundation · Angelina Benefit Rodeo Foundation of the Lufkin Host Lions Club · Simon & Louise Henderson Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary K and Clifford Grum Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary K and Clifford Grum Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mary K and Clifford Grum’s filings →

More from the funding graph