Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary Ingebrand-Pohlad Foundation Abbott Downing

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$162k
Granted FY2021
7
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$50k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

92% of Mary Ingebrand-Pohlad Foundation Abbott Downing’s FY2022 grant dollars went to The Minneapolis Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Mary Ingebrand-Pohlad Foundation Abbott Downing named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $162k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
’19
9
’20
7
’21
3
’22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

Philanthropy$2.0MArts & Culture$1.8MHealth$10k
02FY2021 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $51k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS$50,000
PALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM$50,000
MINNESOTA OPERA$26,000
TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION$25,000
THE ARTS PARTNERSHIP$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES$5,000
MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY$1,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NEMITH ART CENTER: $3k → 10%MINNESOTA OPERA: $50k → 11%PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES: $5k → 14%MCCALLUM THEATRE: $3k → 11%SKIDMORE COLLEGE & TANG MUSEUM: $18k → 7%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $5k → 17%MINNESOTA OPERA: $35k → 11%MINNESOTA MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $5k → 14%PALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM: $625k → 11%MINNESOTA OPERA: $26k → 11%MINNESOTA MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $5k → 14%PALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM: $553k → 11%THE ARTS PARTNERSHIP: $5k → 11%THE ARTS PARTNERSHIP: $5k → 14%PALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM: $50k → 11%THE ARTS PARTNERSHIP: $2k → 11%MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1k → 14%THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION: $2.0M → 11%MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY - NORTH STAR CIRCLE: $1k → 14%MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $100k → 11%TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION: $25k → 14%MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $53k → 11%TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION: $25k → 14%MILL CITY SUMMER OPERA: $3k → 11%TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION: $25k → 14%MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $50k → 11%TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION: $25k → 14%MILL CITY SUMMER OPERA: $3k → 11%MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $25k → 11%GUTHRIE THEATER: $3k → 11%GUTHRIE THEATER: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 9 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2021, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$1.8M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+81%

Still filing today

89%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22
Arts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS
    4× · 2019–2022 · $228k · revenue +18%
  • TC
    TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $100k · revenue +13%
  • TA
    The Arts Partnership
    3× · 2019–2021 · $12k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • SC
    SKIDMORE COLLEGE & TANG MUSEUM
    one grant, 2019 · $18k
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • NC
    North Country Museum of Arts Inc dba NEMETH ART CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +81%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Theater Mu Incorporated

Theater mu produces great performances born of arts, equity, and justice from the heart of the asian american experience.

Arts & Culture
2
Park Square Theatre

To enrich the community by producing and presenting exceptional live theatre that touches the heart, engages the mind and delights the spirit.

—
3
The Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra Society

To enrich the Twin Cities community by sharing distinctive and engaging chamber orchestra performances. We are committed to inclusivity and strive to provide all people in our community with opportunities to connect with our music.

Arts & Culture
4
San Francisco Opera Association

We believe opera is a uniquely compelling, entertaining and emotionally thrilling art form. our mission is to bring together growing audiences to experience opera's transformative power.

Arts & Culture
5
The Great Northern Winter Festival

The great northern celebrates our cold, creative winters through ten days of diverse programming that invigorate mind and body. in an era of changing climate that threatens our signature season, we seek to create community, inspire action,…

Arts & Culture
6
Metropolitan Museum of Art

The metropolitan museum of art collects, studies, conserves, and presents significant works of art across all times and cultures in order to connect people to creativity, knowledge, and ideas.

Arts & Culture
7
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
8
Munson-Williams-Proctor Arts Institute

Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…

Arts & Culture
9
Children's Theatre Company and School

Children's Theatre Company exists to create extraordinary theater experiences that educate, challenge, and inspire young people and their communities.

Arts & Culture
10
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
11
Minnesota Orchestral Association

The minnesota orchestra mission is to enrich, inspire and serve our community as an enduring symphony orchestra internationally recognized for its artistic excellence.

Arts & Culture
12
The Phillips Collection

The phillips collection is the oldest museum of modern and contemporary art in the u.s. in addition to presentation of works from the permanent collection and special exhibitions, the museum maintains active educational, academic,…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minneapolis Society of Fine Arts Dba Minneapolis Institute of Arts; the most unlike its peers is Mill City Summer Opera. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION: $2,005,512 · PhilanthropyTHE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATIONPALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM: $1,328,000 · Arts & CulturePALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUMMINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $227,500 · Arts & CultureMINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INST…The Minnesota Opera: $111,000 · Arts & CultureThe Minnesota OperaTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC+4 more: $28,900 · Arts & CultureSKIDMORE COLLEGE & TANG MUSEUM: $17,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $5,000 · OtherMILL CITY SUMMER OPERA: $5,000 · OtherMCCALLUM THEATRE: $2,500 · OtherNorth Country Museum of Arts Inc dba NEMETH ART CENTER: $2,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES: $5,000 · Health
Philanthropy$2,005,512Arts & Culture$1,795,400Other$32,500Health$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION: $2,005,512 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM: $1,328,000 over 4y, 7.9% of budgetMINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $227,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetThe Minnesota Opera: $111,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Arts Partnership: $11,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMINNESOTA MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMILL CITY SUMMER OPERA: $5,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hrk FoundationMN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hrk Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary Ingebrand-Pohlad Foundation Abbott Downing funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary Ingebrand-Pohlad Foundation Abbott Downing. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mary Ingebrand-Pohlad Foundation Abbott Downing’s filings →

    More from the funding graph