Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mary I McLeod Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$191k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$175kArts & Culture$135kAnimals$68kFood & Nutrition$53kPhilanthropy$32kHuman Services$32kRecreation & Sports$22kReligion$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $99k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $92k
$6,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$134k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GROSSE POINTE MEMORIAL CHURCH$18,000
THE HELM MEALS ON WHEELS$18,000
CHILDREN'S MOVEMENT OF FLORIDA$13,500
GROSSE POINTE THEATER$12,500
SHAW FESTIVAL FOUNDATION$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY$10,000
MERCY HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY$9,500
SAY DETROIT$8,000
GROSSE POINTE SOUTH HIGH SCHOOL$8,000
GROSSE POINTE LIBRARY FOUNDATION$6,250
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$6,000
REGINA HIGH SCHOOL$6,000
CAPUCHIN SOUP KITCHEN$6,000
NEIGHBORHOOD CLUB$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%GUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERV DOGS: $1k → 16%GUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERV DOGS: $1k → 16%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $6k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $4k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $4k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $2k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $2k → 8%THE HELM AT THE BOLL LIFE CENTER: $12k → 21%THE HELM AT THE BOLL LIFE CENTER: $2k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IN
NJ
UT
VA
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$688k · 37 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

37 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
24

Total granted

$688k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+14%

Still filing today

54%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentHealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GP
    GROSSE POINTE THEATRE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $66k · revenue +64%
  • GP
    GROSSE POINTE ANIMAL ADOPTION SOCIETY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $41k · revenue +384%
  • UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $27k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • SF
    SERVICES FOR OLDER CITIZENS INC DBA THE HELM AT THE BOLL LIFE CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $14k · revenue +33%
  • TH
    THE HELM
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • WM
    WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
2
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
3
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
4
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
5
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
6
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
7
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
8
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
9
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
10
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
11
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
12
Global Animal Partnership
Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan and the most unlike its peers is Grosse Pointe Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Affordable Housing Developm…Public Library OperationsCommunity FoundationsCancer Support ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Animal Rescue and ShelterCommunity Arts Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 67 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr15%16%20–35yr14%16%35–55yr18%55%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr15%16%20–35yr14%8%35–55yr18%53%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/45
the rest of the field
12%
6,511/53,811

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/39
Grantees still filing
29/39
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $168,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY — $53,000 · OtherWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITYSHAW FESTIVAL FOUNDATION — $36,250 · OtherSHAW FESTIVAL FOUNDATIONTHE HELM MEALS ON WHEELS — $36,000 · OtherTHE HELM MEALS ON WHEELSMERCY HIGH SCHOOL — $35,000 · OtherMERCY HIGH SCHOOLMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY — $25,000 · OtherGROSSE POINTE WAR MEMORIAL — $20,300 · OtherDUNVEGAN FOUNDATION — $18,500 · OtherGROSSE POINTE MEMORIAL CHURCH — $18,000 · OtherCAPUCHIN SOUP KITCHEN — $17,000 · Other+35 more — $79,669 · Other+35 moreGROSSE POINTE THEATRE INC — $66,075 · Arts & CultureGROSSE POIN…DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $5,050 · Arts & CultureDETROIT SYM…THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS — $3,550 · Arts & Culture+4 more — $2,750 · Arts & CultureGROSSE POINTE ANIMAL ADOPTION SOCIETY — $40,525 · AnimalsGROSSE PO…MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY — $23,000 · AnimalsMICHIGAN …+6 more — $2,150 · AnimalsUNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY — $26,500 · EducationGROSSE POINTE LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $8,750 · EducationDETROIT ATHLETIC CLUB FOUNDATION — $2,122 · EducationLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND — $17,900 · Human ServicesSERVICES FOR OLDER CITIZENS INC DBA THE HELM AT THE BOLL LIFE CENTER — $14,000 · Human ServicesGUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS INC — $2,000 · Human Services+1 more — $60 · Human ServicesEARLY CHILDHOOD INITIATIVE INC — $19,000 · Youth DevelopmentNEIGHBORHOOD CLUB — $16,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$507,219Arts & Culture$77,425Animals$65,675Education$37,372Human Services$33,960Youth Development$19,000Recreation & Sports$16,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGROSSE POINTE THEATRE INC — $66,075 over 6y, 9.3% of budgetGROSSE POINTE ANIMAL ADOPTION SOCIETY — $40,525 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY — $26,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY — $23,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEARLY CHILDHOOD INITIATIVE INC — $19,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND — $17,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CLUB — $16,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSAY DETROIT — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSERVICES FOR OLDER CITIZENS INC DBA THE HELM AT THE BOLL LIFE CENTER — $14,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN — $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGROSSE POINTE LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $8,750 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $5,050 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS — $3,550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGROSSE POINTE HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $2,250 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetDETROIT ATHLETIC CLUB FOUNDATION — $2,122 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGROSSE POINTE ARTISTS ASSOCIATION — $1,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $825 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWHITE HOUSE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTATUE OF LIBERTY ELLIS ISLAND FOUNDATION INC — $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation — $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA INC — $128 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY — $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION — $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKeepers of the Wild — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIGER HAVEN INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GROSSE POINTE THEATRE INC
  • Who funds GROSSE POINTE ANIMAL ADOPTION SOCIETY
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY
  • Who funds MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds EARLY CHILDHOOD INITIATIVE INC
  • Who funds LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD CLUB
  • Who funds SAY DETROIT
  • Who funds SERVICES FOR OLDER CITIZENS INC DBA THE HELM AT THE BOLL LIFE CENTER
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN
  • Who funds GROSSE POINTE LIBRARY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
  • Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS
  • Who funds GROSSE POINTE HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds DETROIT ATHLETIC CLUB FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS INC
  • Who funds GROSSE POINTE ARTISTS ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION
  • Who funds TED LINDSAY FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Doris J & Donald L Duchene Foundation C/O David FindlingMI24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Doris J & Donald L Duchene Foundation C/O David Findling · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · S Gary Spicer Sr Foundation · Joanne Nicolay Foundation · William & Martha Ford Fund · Dolores and Paul Lavins Foundation · Alice Kales Hartwick Foundation · Richard and Jane Manoogian Foundation · Lynn & Paul Alandt Foundation · McGregor Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mary I McLeod Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mary I McLeod Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Mary I McLeod Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph