Skip to content
Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital

Restoring hope and freedom through rehabilitation.

$138k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$283kPhilanthropy$255kHealth$215kArts & Culture$18kSocial Science$13kCommunity Improvement$6kYouth Development$6k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $57,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $137,919 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $80,919 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
$7,750
Median grant
2
States reached
$275M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC$23,250
COREWELL FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN$15,000
BRONSON HEALTH FOUNDATION$7,750
COVENANT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$5,500
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC: $30k → 11%AMERICAN MEDICAL REHABILITATION PROVIDERS ASSOCIATION: $7k → 14%MICHIGAN CROSSROADS INC - BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $6k → 9%DISABILITY ADVOCATES OF KENT COUNTY: $45k → 11%BRONSON HEALTH FOUNDATION: $8k → 12%THE SPARROW FOUNDATION: $13k → 16%COVENANT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $6k → 18%SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC: $30k → 11%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $6k → 11%THE SPARROW FOUNDATION: $8k → 16%COVENANT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $6k → 18%SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC: $23k → 11%HEART OF WEST MICHIGAN UNITED WAY: $60k → 11%THE SPARROW FOUNDATION: $8k → 16%COVENANT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $6k → 18%HEART OF WEST MICHIGAN UNITED WAY: $55k → 11%THE SPARROW FOUNDATION: $8k → 16%HEART OF WEST MICHIGAN UNITED WAY: $55k → 11%HEART OF WEST MICHIGAN UNITED WAY: $30k → 11%HEART OF WEST MICHIGAN UNITED WAY: $28k → 11%HEART OF WEST MICHIGAN UNITED WAY: $28k → 11%SPECTRUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%COREWELL FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN: $15k → 11%SPECTRUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%DISART: $10k → 11%BROADWAY GRAND RAPIDS: $10k → 11%BROADWAY GRAND RAPIDS: $8k → 11%SAINT MARY'S FOUNDATION: $8k → 11%MARY FREE BED REHABILITATION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $7k → 11%THE ECONOMICS CLUB OF GRAND RAPIDS: $7k → 11%THE ECONOMICS CLUB OF GRAND RAPIDS: $6k → 11%MICHIGAN ALLIANCE FOR BUSINESS GROWTH: $6k → 11%ST MARY'S FOUNDATION: $6k → 11%SAINT MARY'S FOUNDATION: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$453k · 9 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue 0% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$453k
$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-6%

Still filing today

78%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $83k · revenue +8%
  • SM
    SAINT MARY'S FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +20%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    3× · 2021–2025 · $20k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • DA
    DISABILITY ADVOCATES OF KENT COUNTY
    one grant, 2022 · $45k · revenue -10%
  • D
    DISART
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -98%
  • MF
    MARY FREE BED REHABILITATION HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $7k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alliance for Regenerative Medicine

The alliance for regenerative medicine (arm) is the preeminent global advocate for regenerative and advanced therapies. arm fosters research, development, investment and commercialization of transformational treatments and cures for…

Health
2
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
3
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
4
American College of Rheumatology Inc

The american college of rheumatology is an organization of and for physicians, health professionals, and scientists that advances rheumatology through programs of education, research, advocacy and practice support that foster excellence in…

—
5
The Arc of the District of Columbia Inc

To improve the quality of life for all persons with intellectual disabilities and their families through supports and advocacy.

Human Services
6
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
7
Kessler Foundation Inc

Kessler Foundation advances rehabilitation research that leads to real-world solutions for people with disabilities, creating new possibilities for restoring function, promoting independence, and improving quality of life. We envision a…

Human Services
8
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
9
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
10
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
11
American Academy of Dermatology Association Inc

To represent the interests of dermatologists and their patients. to influence and be a credible resource for public and private entities related to all policies and regulations that have the potential to affect the delivery of dermatologic…

Health
12
Delaware Health Sciences Alliance Llc

Dhsa aligns resources and efforts to create a unique, broad-based alliance, focused on establishing innovative collaborations among experts in medical education, medical practice, health policy, nursing, workforce development and across…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Scholarship America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Michigan Crossroads Council Inc Boy Scouts of America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
6/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NETWORK FOR GOOD: $255,000 · Public Safety & DisasterNETWORK FOR GOODGRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $200,000 · OtherGRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITYBROADWAY GRAND RAPIDS: $18,000 · OtherBROADWAY GRAND RAPIDSTHE ECONOMICS CLUB OF GRAND RAPIDS: $13,050 · Other+3 more: $18,350 · Other+3 moreCOREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN: $45,000 · HealthCOREWELL HEALTH FOUNDAT…SPARROW FOUNDATION: $37,500 · HealthSPARROW FOUNDATIONSAINT MARY'S FOUNDATION: $19,500 · HealthSAINT MARY'S FOUNDATIONAmerican Heart Association Inc: $19,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Associat…COVENANT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $17,200 · HealthCOVENANT HEALTHCARE FOU…DISART: $10,000 · HealthDISARTBronson Health Foundation: $7,750 · HealthMARY FREE BED REHABILITATION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $7,200 · HealthSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC: $83,000 · EducationSCHOLARSHIP…DISABILITY ADVOCATES OF KENT COUNTY: $45,000 · Philanthropy
Public Safety & Disaster$255,000Other$249,400Health$163,650Education$83,000Philanthropy$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $255,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC: $83,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDISABILITY ADVOCATES OF KENT COUNTY: $45,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSPARROW FOUNDATION: $37,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSAINT MARY'S FOUNDATION: $19,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $19,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY GRAND RAPIDS: $18,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOVENANT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $17,200 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetDISART: $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetMARY FREE BED REHABILITATION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $7,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Medical Rehabilitation Providers Association Inc: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMICHIGAN ALLIANCE FOR BUSINESS GROWTH: $6,250 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMichigan Crossroads Council Inc Boy Scouts of America: $5,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home