Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mary Anna Foundation Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$930k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Religion$2.5MEducation$810kHuman Services$660kFood & Nutrition$350kHealth$200kCivil Rights$100k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $220k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $310k
  • $250k+1 grant · $400k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAGGAI INTERNATIONAL$400,000
NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY$100,000
ST PAUL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF BOCA RATON FL$60,000
PLACE OF HOPE INC$50,000
FOOD FOR THE POOR INC$50,000
FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS$50,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$40,000
FAU FOUNDATION INC$20,000
YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION$20,000
BOCA HELPING HANDS$20,000
CONCORDIA SEMINARY ST LOUIS$20,000
UNITY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$20,000
GRACEPOINT SCHOOL$20,000
LYNN UNIVERSITY INC$20,000
BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $500k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%GPLACE OF HOPE INC: $100k → 11%PLACE OF HOPE INC: $50k → 11%PLACE OF HOPE INC: $50k → 11%PLACE OF HOPE INC: $50k → 11%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS: $50k → 11%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS: $50k → 11%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS: $50k → 11%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS: $50k → 11%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.5M · 16 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against -28% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
1

Total granted

$4.5M
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
-28%

Still filing today

69%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Nova Southeastern University Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $410k · revenue +27%
  • FF
    FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $250k · revenue +20%
  • FA
    FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $100k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • LA
    LUTHERAN ASSOCIATION OF MISSIONARIES AND PILOTS US
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Florida Southern College

Florida southern college (florida southern or the college) is committed to educational excellence and is a selective comprehensive, private, united methodist affiliated college with a strong liberal arts core and signature programs. (see…

Education
2
The Florida International University Health Care Network Inc

Fiu health care network's mission is to improve and support medical education at the fiu herbert wertheim college of medicine and provide clinical support services to the larger fiu community.

3
Loma Linda University

Loma linda university, a seventh-day adventist christian health sciences institution, seeks to further the healing and teaching ministry of jesus christ "to make man whole" by: - educating ethical and proficient christian health…

Education
4
Palm Beach Atlantic University Inc

Palm beach atlantic university equips students to grow in wisdom, lead with conviction and serve god boldly.

Education
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
Loma Linda University Health

The primary purpose of loma linda university health(lluh) is to help coordinate the healing ministry of the seventh-day adventist church. this function is accomplished by managing the various schools and hospitals of lluh's core and…

7
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

8
Florida Gulf Coast University Foundation Inc

To advance florida gulf coast university and its students by promoting the institution, securing philanthropy to support the needs of the university, managing and administering assets with a long term perspective, and providing resources…

Education
9
The Florida State University Foundation Inc

The florida state university foundation enhances the academic mission and vision of florida state university through its organized fundraising activities and funds management. the fsu foundation accomplishes its mission by fostering…

Education
10
Saint Andrew's School of Boca Raton Inc

Saint andrew's school is an independent school founded in the episcopal tradition. our mission is to build a community of learners, provide excellence in education, and nurture each student in mind, body, and spirit.

Education
11
Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady University

University is a 4 year private catholic institution, offering degrees in nursing, health/behavioral sciences, & humanities. the college is an integral part of the fmol health system.

12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gracepoint School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HAGGAI INTERNATIONAL — $2,000,000 · OtherHAGGAI INTERNATIONALST PAUL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF BOCA RATON FL INC — $300,000 · OtherST PAUL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF BOCA RATON FL INCTHE SALVATION ARMY — $160,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYYoung America's Foundation — $100,000 · OtherCONCORDIA SEMINARY ST LOUIS — $100,000 · Other+2 more — $110,000 · OtherNova Southeastern University Inc — $410,000 · EducationNova Southeastern U…FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · EducationFLORIDA ATLANTIC UN…UNITY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLe — $100,000 · EducationUNITY CHRISTIAN SCH…LYNN UNIVERSITY INC — $100,000 · EducationLYNN UNIVERSITY INCGRACEPOINT SCHOOL INC — $100,000 · EducationGRACEPOINT SCHOOL I…FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC — $250,000 · Human ServicesFLORENCE FUL…PLACE OF HOPE INC — $250,000 · Human ServicesPLACE OF HOP…FOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $250,000 · InternationalBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc — $100,000 · Community ImprovementBOCA HELPING HANDS INC — $100,000 · Food & NutritionMAYO CLINIC — $100,000 · Health
Other$2,770,000Education$810,000Human Services$500,000International$250,000Community Improvement$100,000Food & Nutrition$100,000Health$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNova Southeastern University Inc — $410,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $250,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC — $250,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetPLACE OF HOPE INC — $250,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc — $100,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBOCA HELPING HANDS INC — $100,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetUNITY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLe — $100,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetLYNN UNIVERSITY INC — $100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGRACEPOINT SCHOOL INC — $100,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetYoung America's Foundation — $100,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN ASSOCIATION OF MISSIONARIES AND PILOTS US — $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Nova Southeastern University Inc
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC
  • Who funds FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC
  • Who funds PLACE OF HOPE INC
  • Who funds FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc
  • Who funds BOCA HELPING HANDS INC
  • Who funds UNITY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLe
  • Who funds LYNN UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC
  • Who funds GRACEPOINT SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds Young America's Foundation
  • Who funds LUTHERAN ASSOCIATION OF MISSIONARIES AND PILOTS US

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mary Anna Foundation Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc2% of income from government
  • Lynn University Inc0% of income from government
  • Place of Hope Inc0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph