Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary and Emanuel Rosenfeld Foundation No 1

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$104k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$320kEducation$169kReligion$133kAnimals$126kFood & Nutrition$42kInternational$35kArts & Culture$23kPublic Benefit$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARCADIA UNIVERSITY$10,000
K9S FOR WARRIORS$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE$10,000
CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER$10,000
PIEDMONT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC$7,500
INSTITUE FOR JEWISH ETHICS$7,000
GILMER COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY$6,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$5,000
PICKENS ANIMAL RESCUE INC$5,000
CHOC FOUNDATION$5,000
INTREPID FALLEN HEROES FUND$5,000
HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL$5,000
JF SHEA THERAPUETIC RIDING CENTER$5,000
COVENANT HOUSE$4,000
GEORGIA MOUNTAIN FOOD BANK INC$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 45% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%CONGREGATION AHAVAS TORAH: $10k → 22%CHOC FOUNDATION: $12k → 10%CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 14%INTREPID FALLEN HEROES FUND: $8k → 17%HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $8k → 17%K9S FOR WARRIORS: $15k → 6%ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $10k → 17%PICKENS ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $10k → 11%PIEDMONT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $8k → 13%INSTITUE FOR JEWISH ETHICS: $8k → 22%CHOC FOUNDATION: $12k → 10%CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 14%INTREPID FALLEN HEROES FUND: $8k → 17%K9S FOR WARRIORS: $15k → 6%ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $10k → 17%PIEDMONT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $8k → 13%CONGREGATION AHAVAS TORAH: $8k → 22%CHOC FOUNDATION: $12k → 10%CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $12k → 14%K9S FOR WARRIORS: $15k → 6%ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $10k → 17%PIEDMONT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $8k → 13%INSTITUE FOR JEWISH ETHICS: $7k → 22%CHOC FOUNDATION: $12k → 10%CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $12k → 14%K9S FOR WARRIORS: $15k → 6%CHOC FOUNDATION: $12k → 10%CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 14%K9S FOR WARRIORS: $10k → 6%CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 14%K9S FOR WARRIORS: $10k → 6%ETZ CHAIM CENTER FOR JEWISH STUDIES: $15k → 7%ETZ CHAIM CENTER FOR JEWISH STUDIES: $15k → 7%ETZ CHAIM CENTER FOR JEWISH STUDIES: $13k → 7%ETZ CHAIM CENTER FOR JEWISH STUDIES: $10k → 7%ETZ CHAIM CENTER FOR JEWISH STUDIES: $8k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE: $17k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE: $15k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE: $15k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE: $15k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE: $12k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE: $10k → 10%ARCADIA UNIVERSITY: $10k → 7%ARCADIA UNIVERSITY: $10k → 7%ARCADIA UNIVERSITY: $10k → 7%ARCADIA UNIVERSITY: $10k → 7%ARCADIA UNIVERSITY: $10k → 7%ARCADIA UNIVERSITY: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
NY
OH
PA
CA
KS
AR
TN
SC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$868k · 28 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
3

Total granted

$868k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+34%

Still filing today

79%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsEducationReligionInternationalPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • K9S FOR WARRIORS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $80k · revenue +87%
  • CO
    CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $74k · revenue +134%
  • CF
    CHOC FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $65k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • PB
    PALM BEACH GARDENS MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • SS
    SUSAN SAMUELI INTEGRATIVE HEALTH INS
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHILANTHROPYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
2
American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine

The mission of the american college of veterinary internal medicine (acvim) is to enhance animal and human health by advancing veterinary internal medicine through training, education, an discovery. the acvim is the american certifying…

—
3
Piedmont Hospital Inc

To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.

Health
4
Piedmont Heart Institute Inc

Piedmont heart institute, inc., was formed by piedmont healthcare, inc., to advance cardiovascular research and to provide education and excellence in cardiac treatment and disease prevention.

Health
5
Acadia General Hospital Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
6
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
7
Piedmont Mountainside Hospital Inc

To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.

Health
8
American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation

The mission of the akc canine health foundation, inc. is to fund, advance, and communicate canine health research and science through knowledge and discovery.

Animals
9
Piedmont Henry Hospital Inc

To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.

Health
10
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
11
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
12
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heifer International Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Philadelphia Mikvah Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $74,000 · HealthCITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL C…CHOC FOUNDATION: $65,000 · HealthCHOC FOUNDATIONST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $45,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOS…Piedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc: $36,000 · HealthPiedmont Healthcare Foundation …VITAS COMMUNITY CONNECTION: $23,000 · HealthVITAS COMMUNITY CONNECTIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE: $84,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINETHE ETZ CHAIM CENTER FOR JEWISH STUDIES: $61,500 · OtherTHE ETZ CHAIM CENTER FOR JEWISH STUDIESCONGREGATION AHAVAS TORAH: $27,500 · OtherCONGREGATION AHAVAS TORAHVESTED INTEREST IN K9S INC: $22,500 · OtherVESTED INTEREST IN K9S INCHEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $22,500 · OtherHEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATIONHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $12,500 · OtherJF SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC FKA FRAN JOSWICK THERAP RIDING CTR INC: $32,000 · OtherJF SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC FKA…AMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC: $11,500 · Other+8 more: $47,500 · Other+8 moreK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $80,000 · AnimalsK9S FOR WARRIO…PICKENS ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $28,000 · AnimalsPICKENS ANIMAL…ROAD TRIP HOME ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $5,500 · AnimalsARCADIA UNIVERSITY: $60,000 · EducationARCADIA UN…GRATZ COLLEGE: $25,000 · EducationGRATZ COLL…Gilmer Community Food Pantry: $23,500 · Food & NutritionGEORGIA MOUNTAIN FOOD BANK INC: $18,000 · Food & NutritionJEWISH LEARNING VENTURE: $24,000 · ReligionInstitute for Jewish Ethics: $15,000 · ReligionTHE INTREPID FALLEN HEROES FUND: $35,000 · Philanthropy
Health$243,000Other$321,500Animals$113,500Education$85,000Food & Nutrition$41,500Religion$39,000Philanthropy$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $80,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $74,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHOC FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetARCADIA UNIVERSITY: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $45,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPiedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc: $36,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INTREPID FALLEN HEROES FUND: $35,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJF SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC FKA FRAN JOSWICK THERAP RIDING CTR INC: $32,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPICKENS ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $28,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetGRATZ COLLEGE: $25,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH LEARNING VENTURE: $24,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetGilmer Community Food Pantry: $23,500 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetVITAS COMMUNITY CONNECTION: $23,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetHEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGIA MOUNTAIN FOOD BANK INC: $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetInstitute for Jewish Ethics: $15,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC: $11,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $10,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROAD TRIP HOME ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $5,500 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetPhiladelphia Mikvah Association: $5,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetAMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHILANTHROPY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHOC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARCADIA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Piedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE INTREPID FALLEN HEROES FUND ↗
  • Who funds JF SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC FKA FRAN JOSWICK THERAP RIDING CTR INC ↗
  • Who funds PICKENS ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds GRATZ COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH LEARNING VENTURE ↗
  • Who funds Gilmer Community Food Pantry ↗
  • Who funds VITAS COMMUNITY CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds HEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA MOUNTAIN FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Institute for Jewish Ethics ↗
  • Who funds HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds ROAD TRIP HOME ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Philadelphia Mikvah Association ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHILANTHROPY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC7.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary and Emanuel Rosenfeld Foundation No 1 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary and Emanuel Rosenfeld Foundation No 1. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mary and Emanuel Rosenfeld Foundation No 1?

Find your warmest path to Mary and Emanuel Rosenfeld Foundation No 1 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mary and Emanuel Rosenfeld Foundation No 1’s filings →

More from the funding graph