Skip to content

· Private foundation

Martini Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$392k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$249k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.1MRecreation & Sports$916kHealth$101kInternational$91kReligion$58kEnvironment$10kYouth Development$8kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $350k
$3,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$109k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS$249,410
FRIENDS OF HUDSON RIVER PARK$100,225
CONVENT OF THE SACRED HEART$19,994
COLLEGIATE SCHOOL$14,712
METROPOLITAN OVAL FOUNDATION$3,500
Individual grant recipient$2,572
FRIENDS OF DUANE PARK$664
THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION$371
META - PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND$154
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETE: $500 → 11%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $258 → 6%CHALLENGED ATHLETE: $500 → 11%SONGS OF LOVE FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%SONGS OF LOVE FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
MA
WY
PA
CA
CO
MO
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 30 repeat orgs$203k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
58

Total granted

$3.1M
$200k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+38%

Still filing today

53%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +184%
  • PA
    President and Fellows of Middlebury College
    5× · 2017–2024 · $250k · revenue +47%
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    6× · 2017–2023 · $90k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF HUDSON PARK
    one grant, 2017 · $99k
  • THE PINGREE SCHOOL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $53k · revenue +38%
  • PL
    PECONIC LAND TRUST INC
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
9
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
11
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Success Academy Charter Schools Inc; the most unlike its peers is Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
29/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INC: $1,730,031 · EducationSUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INCPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College: $250,087 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College+6 more: $71,383 · EducationFRIENDS OF HUDSON RIVER PARK INC: $754,002 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF HUDSON RIVER PAR…Metropolitan Oval Foundation Inc: $28,379 · Recreation & Sports+2 more: $10,228 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF HUDSON PARK: $99,068 · OtherFRIENDS OF …MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $70,178 · OtherMASS GENERA…CONVENT OF THE SACRED HEART: $40,356 · OtherCONVENT OF …SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $30,012 · OtherSHORE COUNT…Individual grant recipient: $19,436 · OtherIndividual …+65 more: $73,295 · Other+65 moreUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $90,491 · International+1 more: $100 · InternationalSONGS OF LOVE FOUNDATION: $20,128 · Human ServicesCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $6,000 · Human Services+1 more: $258 · Human ServicesPECONIC LAND TRUST INC: $7,500 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF DUANE PARK INC: $1,175 · Environment+1 more: $200 · EnvironmentNEW HEIGHTS YOUTH INC: $7,500 · Youth Development+1 more: $256 · Youth Development
Education$2,051,501Recreation & Sports$792,609Other$332,345International$90,591Human Services$26,386Environment$8,875Youth Development$7,756

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INC: $1,730,031 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF HUDSON RIVER PARK INC: $754,002 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College: $250,087 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $90,491 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PINGREE SCHOOL INC: $52,769 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $30,012 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMetropolitan Oval Foundation Inc: $28,379 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSONGS OF LOVE FOUNDATION: $20,128 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCOLLEGIATE SCHOOL INC: $14,985 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDowntown United Soccer Club Inc: $8,724 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPECONIC LAND TRUST INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HEIGHTS YOUTH INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ARMORY FOUNDATION: $6,970 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $3,425 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GO PROJECT INC: $2,010 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC: $1,544 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACKSON HOLE SKI & SNOWBOARD CLUB: $1,504 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF DUANE PARK INC: $1,175 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF WASHINGTON MARKET PARK INC: $1,121 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetAMERICA NEEDS YOU: $1,049 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN OF NEW YORK INC: $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTeam Steady Buckets: $510 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBEYOND TYPE 1: $510 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAYSIDE ACADEMY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $371 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERY MOTHER COUNTS: $265 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $258 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA LEG TO STAND ON INC: $256 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH FORK NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOUISIANA NATIONAL GUARD FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIGHTY OAKES HEART FOUNDATION: $124 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $108 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOWER FORWARD INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAZOM INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATIONAL RECORDS BUREAU INC: $70 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARFAN FOUNDATION INC: $52 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF HUDSON RIVER PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Middlebury College ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds THE PINGREE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Metropolitan Oval Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SONGS OF LOVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGIATE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Downtown United Soccer Club Inc ↗
  • Who funds PECONIC LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW HEIGHTS YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARMORY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GO PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON HOLE SKI & SNOWBOARD CLUB ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF DUANE PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS OF WASHINGTON MARKET PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA NEEDS YOU ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY13.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Martini Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Martini Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College: 1% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 92 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Martini Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph