Skip to content

· Private foundation

Martin G Youngstrom Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$27k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$37kArts & Culture$26kHuman Services$21kEducation$21kHealth$16kPhilanthropy$3kYouth Development$2kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$665k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE KOL AMI$12,200
NEIGHBORS 4 NEIGHBORS$5,000
ART AND CULTURE CENTER$5,000
DAVID POSNACK JCC$3,500
FANS OF THE EVERGLADES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%JAX FAM FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%IN JACOB'S SHOES: $360 → 13%CHILDREN'S HARBOR: $1k → 13%CHILDREN'S HARBOR: $500 → 13%DAVID POSNACK JCC: $4k → 13%DAVID POSNACK JCC: $4k → 13%DAVID POSNACK JCC: $4k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$91k · 7 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
15

Total granted

$91k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+11%

Still filing today

29%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsPublic Safety & DisasterPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TK
    TEMPLE KOL AMI INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $37k
  • AA
    ART AND CULTURE CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $26k
  • CF
    CENTER FOR AUTISM AND RELATED DISAB
    5× · 2020–2024 · $13k

Funded once

  • HE
    HORIZON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • JF
    JAX FAM FOUNDATION CORPORATION
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gulf Coast Jewish Family and Community Services Inc

Inspired by jewish values, we protect the vulnerable, empower individuals and strengthen families. (continued on schedule o)

—
2
Jewish Adoption and Foster Care Options Inc

The organization's mission is to care for abused, neglected and at-risk children as well as those with developmental disabilities in the jewish community and to work in partnership with families and the entire community.

Human Services
3
Better Together Strengthening Familes Inc

Better together helps at-risk families by empowering parents and surrounding them with community, meaningful work opportunities, and practical support. our volunteer-driven, professionally supported model provides direct services so that…

Human Services
4
Jewish Family Services of Broward Foundation Inc

To provide for the advocacy and resources for jewish family services in broward county and together to provide vision, leadership, programmatic support, and resources to affiliated jewish family service programs in broward county, for…

Philanthropy
5
The Jewish Federation of Sarasota-Manatee Inc

To strengthen jewish life and identity in our community, provide for jewish people in need and promote support for israel.

Philanthropy
6
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
7
Miami-Dade Family Learning Partnership Inc

The miami-dade learning partnership is dedicated to families and children in the south florida community. the organization collaborates with community agencies and institutions to improve child and family well being.

Education
8
The Twig Cares Inc

To provide a haven for the foster care community where needs are met, hearts are encouraged, and god's love is shown in a practical way.

Human Services
9
Florida Family Voice Inc

To protect and defend life, marriage, family and liberty through education, advocacy and empowerment.

Education
10
Andrew Red Harris Foundation Inc

Over the past fifty years our south florida ocean habitat and reefs have been degraded by a variety of destructive influences including population growth, climate change, pollution, invasive exotic species and lack of education on and…

Education
11
Babcock Ranch Foundation Inc

The babcock ranch foundation is a florida non-profit corporation whose mission is to support, enhance, and implement projects that positively impact many worthy causes in southwest florida. passionate about the issues that most profoundly…

Community Improvement
12
Miami Children's Museum Inc Fka Miami Youth Museum

Miami children's museum is a non-profit educational institution, which meets the needs of all children in our multicultural community. visitors of all ages are encouraged to play together, learn, imagine, and create. the museum offers…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighbors 4 Neighbors; the most unlike its peers is Ryan Gilbert Foundation Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE KOL AMI INC: $36,700 · OtherTEMPLE KOL AMI INCART AND CULTURE CENTER: $25,700 · OtherART AND CULTURE CENTERCENTER FOR AUTISM AND RELATED DISAB: $12,500 · OtherCENTER FOR AUTISM AND RELATED DISABHORIZON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherHORIZON ELEMENTARY SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+10 more: $12,250 · Other+10 moreJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF SOUTH BROWARD INC: $10,500 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUN…JAX FAM FOUNDATION CORPORATION: $3,000 · Human ServicesJAX FAM FOUND…CHILDRENS HARBOR INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS HAR…+1 more: $360 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORS 4 NEIGHBORS: $5,000 · Public Safety & DisasterRYAN GILBERT FOUNDATION CORP: $1,500 · HealthSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $360 · HealthFLAMINGO GARDENS INC: $1,000 · AnimalsWreaths Across America: $350 · Public Benefit
Other$105,150Human Services$15,360Public Safety & Disaster$5,000Health$1,860Animals$1,000Public Benefit$350

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF SOUTH BROWARD INC: $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORS 4 NEIGHBORS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetJAX FAM FOUNDATION CORPORATION: $3,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetCHILDRENS HARBOR INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH ENVIRONMENTAL ALLIANCE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFLAMINGO GARDENS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JACOB S ZWEIG FOUNDATION INC: $360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWreaths Across America: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF SOUTH BROWARD INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORS 4 NEIGHBORS ↗
  • Who funds JAX FAM FOUNDATION CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS HARBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds RYAN GILBERT FOUNDATION CORP ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH ENVIRONMENTAL ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds FLAMINGO GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds SHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE JACOB S ZWEIG FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Wreaths Across America ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Broward IncFL15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Broward Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Martin G Youngstrom Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Martin G Youngstrom Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Youth Environmental Alliance Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Jewish Community Centers of South Broward Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Martin G Youngstrom’s filings →

More from the funding graph