· Private foundation
Martin G Youngstrom Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TEMPLE KOL AMI | $12,200 |
| NEIGHBORS 4 NEIGHBORS | $5,000 |
| ART AND CULTURE CENTER | $5,000 |
| DAVID POSNACK JCC | $3,500 |
| FANS OF THE EVERGLADES | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TKTEMPLE KOL AMI INC6× · 2020–2025 · $37k
- AAART AND CULTURE CENTER6× · 2020–2025 · $26k
- CFCENTER FOR AUTISM AND RELATED DISAB5× · 2020–2024 · $13k
Funded once
- HEHORIZON ELEMENTARY SCHOOLone grant, 2022 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $8k
- JFJAX FAM FOUNDATION CORPORATIONone grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -39%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Inspired by jewish values, we protect the vulnerable, empower individuals and strengthen families. (continued on schedule o)
The organization's mission is to care for abused, neglected and at-risk children as well as those with developmental disabilities in the jewish community and to work in partnership with families and the entire community.
Better together helps at-risk families by empowering parents and surrounding them with community, meaningful work opportunities, and practical support. our volunteer-driven, professionally supported model provides direct services so that…
To provide for the advocacy and resources for jewish family services in broward county and together to provide vision, leadership, programmatic support, and resources to affiliated jewish family service programs in broward county, for…
To strengthen jewish life and identity in our community, provide for jewish people in need and promote support for israel.
We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…
The miami-dade learning partnership is dedicated to families and children in the south florida community. the organization collaborates with community agencies and institutions to improve child and family well being.
To provide a haven for the foster care community where needs are met, hearts are encouraged, and god's love is shown in a practical way.
To protect and defend life, marriage, family and liberty through education, advocacy and empowerment.
Over the past fifty years our south florida ocean habitat and reefs have been degraded by a variety of destructive influences including population growth, climate change, pollution, invasive exotic species and lack of education on and…
The babcock ranch foundation is a florida non-profit corporation whose mission is to support, enhance, and implement projects that positively impact many worthy causes in southwest florida. passionate about the issues that most profoundly…
Miami children's museum is a non-profit educational institution, which meets the needs of all children in our multicultural community. visitors of all ages are encouraged to play together, learn, imagine, and create. the museum offers…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighbors 4 Neighbors and the most unlike its peers is Ryan Gilbert Foundation Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF SOUTH BROWARD INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORS 4 NEIGHBORS ↗
- Who funds JAX FAM FOUNDATION CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS HARBOR INC ↗
- Who funds RYAN GILBERT FOUNDATION CORP ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ENVIRONMENTAL ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds FLAMINGO GARDENS INC ↗
- Who funds SHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE JACOB S ZWEIG FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Wreaths Across America ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Broward Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Martin G Youngstrom Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Youth Environmental Alliance Inc — 18% of income from government
- Jewish Community Centers of South Broward Inc — 8% of income from government
- Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.