Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Martin Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$700k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Environment$4.2MYouth Development$1.8MFood & Nutrition$1.2MHuman Services$509kEducation$260kInternational$250kCommunity Improvement$180kHousing & Shelter$60kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.0M
$30,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$32M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA OF BUCKS COUNTY$700,000
SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION$325,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
FREIRE FOUNDATION$30,000
HERITAGE CONSERVANCY$30,000
LUNCH BREAK$10,000
SAN FRANCISCO-MARIN FOOD BANK$10,000
PARK VIEW COMMUNITY MISSION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $717k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%CONTINUING THE MISSION: $5k → 10%SDG IMPACT FUND: $250k → 10%PARK VIEW COMMUNITY MISSION: $10k → 13%PARK VIEW COMMUNITY MISSION: $10k → 13%PARK VIEW COMMUNITY MISSION: $10k → 13%PARK VIEW COMMUNITY MISSION: $8k → 13%PARK VIEW COMMUNITY MISSION: $8k → 13%PARK VIEW COMMUNITY MISSION: $8k → 13%PARK VIEW COMMUNITY MISSION: $8k → 13%CENTRAL BUCKS FAMILY YMCA: $175k → 6%CENTRAL BUCKS FAMILY YMCA: $125k → 6%CENTRAL BUCKS FAMILY YMCA: $100k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MO
VA
NC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.3M · 18 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +109% since the first grant, against +80% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
15

Total granted

$7.3M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+109%
+80%

Still filing today

72%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND
    6× · 2017–2023 · $426k · revenue +109%
  • RC
    RIVER CROSSING YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $400k · revenue +421%
  • FF
    FREIRE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $245k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • Feeding Americagraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue +40%
  • TH
    THE HISPANIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $36k
  • TM
    THE MISSION CONTINUES
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue -68%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
2
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
3
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
4
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
5
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
6
Second Harvest Food Bank Santa Cruz County

Second harvest food bank's mission is to end hunger and malnutrition by educating and involving the community.

Food & Nutrition
7
Share Food Program

As the largest serving hunger-relief organization in the greater philadelphia region, share food program's mission is reducing regional food insecurity by providing nourishing food to a network of community-based partners and directly to…

Food & Nutrition
8
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
9
San Francisco Market Corporation

Our mission is to connect and grow the region's food agriculture community from our wholesale market in the heart of san francisco. our vision is for all communities in the san francisco bay area to have reliable access to abundant fresh…

Community Improvement
10
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

11
Share My Meals Inc

Originating in mercer county in 2020 with the mission of tackling both food insecurity and food waste, share my meals has since expanded across the state of new jersey. more than 994,000 new jersey residents are food-secure while over 1.9…

Human Services
12
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Francisco Parks Alliance and the most unlike its peers is The Sandy Hook Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLand Conservation Organizat…Homeless Services & ShelterCancer Support OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionCommunity Health CentersCommunity FoundationsVeteran Support ServicesYmca Community CentersFood Pantries & Assistance
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%33%10–20yr17%11%20–35yr11%37%35–55yr13%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%1%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr17%0%20–35yr11%31%35–55yr13%59%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,949

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
21/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $3,752,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATIONTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $426,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND+1 more — $15,000 · EnvironmentYMCA OF BUCKS COUNTY — $1,820,000 · OtherYMCA OF BUCKS COUNTYIndividual grant recipient — $180,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+18 more — $319,500 · Other+18 moreFeeding America — $1,000,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding Americ…LUNCH BREAK INC — $70,000 · Food & NutritionLUNCH BREAK IN…West Ohio Food Bank — $60,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $8,000 · Food & NutritionRIVER CROSSING YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $400,000 · Human ServicesRIVER CRO…SDG IMPACT FUND INC — $250,000 · Human ServicesSDG IMPAC…PARK VIEW COMMUNITY MISSION INC — $62,000 · Human ServicesPARK VIEW…+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesFREIRE FOUNDATION — $245,000 · Education+1 more — $5,000 · EducationHERITAGE CONSERVANCY INC — $30,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SANDY HOOK FOUNDATION INC — $27,000 · Arts & CultureJUSTICE OUTSIDE — $27,000 · PhilanthropySONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Philanthropy
Environment$4,193,000Other$2,319,500Food & Nutrition$1,138,000Human Services$717,000Education$250,000Arts & Culture$57,000Philanthropy$37,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $3,752,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetFeeding America — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $426,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRIVER CROSSING YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $400,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSDG IMPACT FUND INC — $250,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFREIRE FOUNDATION — $245,000 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetLUNCH BREAK INC — $70,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetPARK VIEW COMMUNITY MISSION INC — $62,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetWest Ohio Food Bank — $60,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBUCKS COUNTY HOUSING GROUP INC — $50,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MISSION CONTINUES — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHERITAGE CONSERVANCY INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJUSTICE OUTSIDE — $27,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE SANDY HOOK FOUNDATION INC — $27,000 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetSEMPERVIRENS FUND — $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSTEPHY'S PLACE - A NEW LIFE SUPPORT CENTER FOR GRIEF AND LOSS — $12,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIRIAM'S HOUSE INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLYNCHBURG DAILY BREAD INC — $8,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetParker Family Health Center Inc — $7,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetVALOR CLINIC FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONTINUING THE MISSION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetIRON LIVES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCANAL ALLIANCE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARY'S PLACE BY THE SEA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEW JERSEY SEA GRANT CONSORTIUM INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Valtim Family Foundation IncVA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Valtim Family Foundation Inc · Easley Char Irr Tua 5019004715 · Centra Health Inc · Greater Lynchburg Community Foundation · Foster Foundation · Manasquan Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · New Jersey Natural Gas Company Charity Inc · Investors Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Martin Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 35%
  • New Jersey Sea Grant Consortium Inc35% of income from government
  • Lunch Break Inc4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Martin Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Martin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph