How much does Martin F Hatch Fund for Religious & Charitable Uses give?

Martin F Hatch Fund for Religious & Charitable Uses reported 8 grants totaling $41,500 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 26 and 41 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2024.

Who are Martin F Hatch Fund for Religious & Charitable Uses's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: Armenian Missionary Assoc of Amer Inc ($48k), Tempesta Di Mare Inc ($34k), The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc ($22k).

Does Martin F Hatch Fund for Religious & Charitable Uses fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 12% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does Martin F Hatch Fund for Religious & Charitable Uses accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as Martin F Hatch Fund for Religious & Charitable Uses?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Community Foundation of Tompkins County Inc, Park Foundation Inc, Legacy Foundation of Tompkins County.

Martin F Hatch Fund for Religious & Charitable Uses

Martin F Hatch Fund for Religious & Charitable Uses at a glance

· Private foundation

Martin F Hatch Fund for Religious & Charitable Uses

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$10k

Largest

01What it funds

0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$63kReligion$60kEnvironment$59kHuman Services$46kInternational$28kScience & Tech$24kCivil Rights$14kEducation$13kOther$0

02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k6 grants · $22k
$10k–50k2 grants · $20k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$870k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
TEMPSETA DI MARE	$10,000
ARMENIAN MISSIONARY ASSN OF AMER	$10,000
BLANCHET HOUSE	$7,500
TRANSITION PROJECTS	$5,000
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS	$3,000
AHCBOSCO-MILLIGAN FOUNDATION	$2,500
NUSANTARA ARTS	$2,000
PHILADELPHIA ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY	$1,500

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 65% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$292k · 41 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$292k

$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%

+21%

Still filing today

59%

19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EnvironmentInternationalArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TD
TEMPESTA DI MARE INC
5× · 2020–2025 · $34k · revenue +123%
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $15k · revenue +26%
NA
NUSANTARA ARTS INC
4× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +264%

Funded once

AM
ARMMENIAN MISSIONARY ASSN OF AMER2
one grant, 2020 · $7k
CU
CORNELL UNIVERSITY ALUMNI GIVING CO SOUTHEAST ASIA PROGRAM
one grant, 2020 · $5k
QS
QUADRANGLE SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING RESIDENT'S ASSISTANCE FUND
one grant, 2020 · $5k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment

Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment

Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment

Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education

Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition

The International Dark-Sky Association Inc

Darksky international restores the nighttime environment and protects communities from the harmful effects of light pollution through outreach, advocacy, and conservation.

—

Fresh Energy

Shape and drive bold policy solutions to achieve equitable carbon-neutral economies.

Environment

Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights

The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International

Climate Conservation Dba Center for Large Landscape Conservation

We bring science, policy, and proven solutions directly to communities working to restore the integrity and natural connectivity of the landscapes in which they live. (see schedule o)

Environment

Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment

Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Transformative Action; the most unlike its peers is The Quadrangle in care of Robert Hess. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

33/33

Grantees still filing

22/33

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$205,299Arts & Culture$45,400Environment$44,950International$36,000Health$5,000Philanthropy$3,600Crime & Legal$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Tompkins County IncNY26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tompkins County Inc · Park Foundation Inc · Legacy Foundation of Tompkins County · Triad Foundation Inc · City Federation of Women's Organizations Inc · The Peter Browning Family Foundation · United Way of Tompkins County Inc · Tompkins Charitable Gift Fund Inc · Brooks Family Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Martin F Hatch Fund for Religious & Charitable Uses funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Martin F Hatch Fund for Religious & Charitable Uses. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Martin F Hatch Fund for Religious & Charitable Uses’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home