· Private foundation
Martin & Clarisse Clancy Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 67% of MARTIN & CLARISSE CLANCY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MERGE OPPORTUNITIES | $25,000 |
| FOOD FINDERS | $10,000 |
| ST JOSEPH CHURCH | $6,000 |
| LONG BEACH MOTOR PATROL | $5,000 |
| WOMEN'S SHELTER OF LONG BEACH | $5,000 |
| LIVE-LOVE ANIMAL RESCUE | $3,000 |
| CANCER COMMONS | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $79k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OOOrder of Malta Clinic of Northern California7× · 2017–2024 · $22k · revenue +276%
- WIWOMEN IN ACTION REACHING OUT2× · 2017–2018 · $15k · revenue +61%
- POPARTNERS OF PARKS3× · 2018–2024 · $10k · revenue +101%
Funded once
- HHuman-I-Tgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue +25%
- MOMEAL ON WHEELS LONG BEACHone grant, 2020 · $25k
- ALAssistance League of Long Beachone grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to support homebound seniors, veterans, individuals with chronic illnesses, and those with disabilities by providing nutritious meals, meaningful social connections, and a range of in-home support services. These efforts…
Expand opportunities available to underresourced individuals in the city of long beach
provides resources and develops programs to serve the needs of families, seniors, and youths in the underserved communities of the City of Long Beach.
We Love Long Beach's mission is to inspire and equip neighbors towards helping eachother and the city of Long Beach flourish. They work towards reaching this goal by connecting neighbors, one block at a time.
Family promise of the south bay assists families experiencing housing insecurity with short-term shelter, case management, and navigation with the goal of creating a sustainable solution for their family.
Our purpose is to feed, care and educate the homeless.
Provide temporary housing, clothing, counseling services, food and financial assistance for homeless individuals.
TCC Family Health mission is to provide innovative, integrated, quality health care that will contribute to a healthy community, focusing on those in need and working with patients and the community as partners in their overall well-being.
LBCEI is a community development corporation that expands inclusive economic opportunities to build and sustain wealth for all communities in Long Beach.
The mission of laguna beach community clinic (lbcc) is to provide excellent medical care regardless of the patient's ability to pay.
One on one outreach is a 100% volunteer, non-profit organization that packs and delivers boxes of groceries, once a month to low-income families who live in a small neighborhood in south los angeles; figueroa st. between 117th street and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Womenshelter of Long Beach and the most unlike its peers is Mount Si High School Band Boosters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Human-I-T ↗
- Who funds Assistance League of Long Beach ↗
- Who funds Heart of Ida ↗
- Who funds MERGE OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds Order of Malta Clinic of Northern California ↗
- Who funds WOMENSHELTER OF LONG BEACH ↗
- Who funds WOMEN IN ACTION REACHING OUT ↗
- Who funds FOOD FINDERS INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS OF PARKS ↗
- Who funds HUMANSAVE ↗
- Who funds SUCCESS IN CHALLENGES INC ↗
- Who funds ST MARY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LONG BEACH POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INTERVAL HOUSE ↗
- Who funds THE AIDS FOOD STORE INC ↗
- Who funds Father Als Outreach Inc ↗
- Who funds Christian Outreach Appeal dba Christian Outreach in Action ↗
- Who funds LIVE LOVE ANIMAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds LONG BEACH BASKET BRIGADE ↗
- Who funds CARSON CITIZENS CULTURAL ARTS FDTN ↗
- Who funds NEW LIFE BEGINNINGS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Bess J Hodges Foundation · Long Beach Community Foundation · The Josephine S Gumbiner Foundation · The Rudolph J & Daphne a Munzer Foundation · Earl B & Loraine H Miller Foundation · Farmers & Merchants Bank Foundation · Food Finders Inc · The Ahmanson Foundation · California Community Foundation · California Foundation for Stronger Communities · Long Beach Nonprofit Partnership Inc DBA The Nonprofit Partnership · Keesal Young & Logan Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Martin & Clarisse Clancy Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Martin & Clarisse Clancy Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Martin & Clarisse Clancy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.