Skip to content
Martha & Kenneth Revoir Scholarship at a glance

· Private foundation

Martha & Kenneth Revoir Scholarship

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$568k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$3,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$905k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT$14,500
CENTRAL CONNECTICUT ST UNIVERSITY$9,500
THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE$6,000
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$3,500
QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY$3,500
AVA MARIA UNIVERSITY$3,500
DICKINSON COLLEGE$3,500
SPRINGFIELD COLLEGE$3,500
FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY$2,500
SOUTHERN CT STATE UNIVERSITY$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD$2,500
TRINITY COLLEGE$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE: $10k → 14%SPRINGFIELD COLLEGE: $8k → 17%DICKINSON COLLEGE: $8k → 8%IONA COLLEGE: $5k → 9%ROCHESTER INSTITUTE: $6k → 14%PACE UNIVERSITY: $9k → 17%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%AVE MARIA UNIVERSITY: $10k → 10%FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY: $10k → 9%CENTRAL CONNECTICUT UNIVERSITY: $24k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT: $25k → 11%HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE: $10k → 14%SPRINGFIELD COLLEGE: $8k → 17%DICKINSON COLLEGE: $8k → 8%PACE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 17%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%AVA MARIA UNIVERSITY: $5k → 10%SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY: $8k → 9%CENTRAL CONNECTICUT UNIVERSITY: $19k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT: $23k → 11%THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE: $10k → 14%SPRINGFIELD COLLEGE: $8k → 17%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY: $5k → 9%CENTRAL CONNECTICUT UNIVERSITY: $19k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT: $22k → 11%QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY: $8k → 12%THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE: $6k → 14%FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY: $18k → 9%CENTRAL CONNECTICUT UNIVERSITY: $15k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT: $20k → 11%QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY: $10k → 9%CENTRAL CONNECTICUT UNIVERSITY: $14k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT: $15k → 11%FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY: $8k → 9%CENTRAL CONNECTICUT ST UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT: $14k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAVEN: $8k → 12%CENTRAL CONNECTICUT UNIVERSITY: $8k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT: $9k → 11%SOUTHERN CT STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT: $9k → 11%SOUTHERN CT STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 12%THE UNIVERSITY OF SAINT JOSEPH: $18k → 11%SOUTHERN CT STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%THE UNIVERSITY OF SAINT JOSEPH: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
CT
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$530k · 16 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
4

Total granted

$530k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+37%

Still filing today

75%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Fairfield University
    5× · 2020–2025 · $48k · revenue +54%
  • TA
    THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $36k · revenue +6%
  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $34k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of New Havengraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +37%
  • RI
    ROCHESTER INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • HP
    HIGH POINT UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +45%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
4
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
5
Georgian Court University

Georgian court university (gcu), provides a comprehensive liberal arts education and is open to students of all faiths, delivers a curriculum that promotes scholarship, service, and personal development.

Education
6
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
7
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
8
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
9
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
11
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
12
Hillsdale College

Hillsdale college is a private liberal arts college with approximately 1,500 students. founded in 1844, the college remains, in the words of its articles of association, "grateful to god for the inestimable blessings resulting from the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Quinnipiac University; the most unlike its peers is Dickinson College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Fairfield University: $47,500 · EducationFairfield UniversityTHOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE: $36,000 · EducationTHOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGEGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $33,500 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF SAINT JOSEPH: $31,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SAINT JOSEPHSPRINGFIELD COLLEGE: $27,500 · EducationSPRINGFIELD COLLEGEDICKINSON COLLEGE: $19,000 · EducationDICKINSON COLLEGEAVE MARIA UNIVERSITY INC: $18,500 · EducationAVE MARIA UNIVERSITY INCQUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY: $16,000 · EducationQUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITYSACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED: $12,500 · EducationPACE UNIVERSITY: $12,000 · Education+7 more: $33,500 · Education+7 moreUNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT: $134,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUTCENTRAL CONNECTICUT UNIVERSITY: $99,500 · OtherCENTRAL CONNECTICUT UNIVERSITYSOUTHERN CT STATE UNIVERSITY: $23,500 · OtherSOUTHERN CT STATE UNIVERSITYCENTRAL CONNECTICUT ST UNIVERSITY: $9,500 · Other+3 more: $13,500 · Other
Education$287,000Other$280,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFairfield University: $47,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE: $36,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $33,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAINT JOSEPH: $31,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPRINGFIELD COLLEGE: $27,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDICKINSON COLLEGE: $19,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAVE MARIA UNIVERSITY INC: $18,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetQUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY: $16,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPACE UNIVERSITY: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIONA UNIVERSITY: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of New Haven: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMITCHELL COLLEGE: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican International College: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Fairfield University ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAINT JOSEPH ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DICKINSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds AVE MARIA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds PACE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds IONA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of New Haven ↗
  • Who funds MITCHELL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds American International College ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Collegiate A…The Pfizer Foundation…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Collegiate Athletic AssociationIN14× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Collegiate Athletic Association · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Martha & Kenneth Revoir Scholarship funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Martha & Kenneth Revoir Scholarship. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • University of New Haven: 1% of income from government
  • Mitchell College: 1% of income from government
  • University of Saint Joseph: 1% of income from government
  • University of Hartford: 1% of income from government
  • Fairfield University: 1% of income from government
  • Sacred Heart University Incorporated: 0% of income from government
  • Quinnipiac University: 0% of income from government
  • Springfield College: 0% of income from government
  • American International College: 0% of income from government
  • Ave Maria University Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Martha & Kenneth Revoir Scholarship?

Find your warmest path to Martha & Kenneth Revoir Scholarship through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Martha & Kenneth Revoir Scholarship’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home