Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marshall and Mary Brondum Special Assistance Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$266k
Granted FY2025still arriving
84
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$600kHousing & Shelter$301kHuman Services$163kCommunity Improvement$92kPhilanthropy$26kFood & Nutrition$12kArts & Culture$5kEducation$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 84 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k77 grants · $192k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $74k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$13,735
MISSION VALLEY SENIOR CENTER$10,000
PARTNERS HOPE FOUNDATION$10,000
RADIO TALKING BOOK SERVICE$10,000
MISSOULA AGING SERVICES$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ANGEL FLIGHT WEST$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,105
Individual grant recipient$8,595
Individual grant recipient$6,532
PINTER MIKE LECLAIR BARB$6,000
CATALYST FOR CHANGE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,865
Individual grant recipient$4,860
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA: $1k → 9%MY GLACIER VILLAGE: $5k → 11%PEACE PLACE: $3k → 14%MISSION VALLEY SENIOR CENTER: $10k → 18%MOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA: $1k → 9%MISSION VALLEY SENIOR CENTER: $5k → 18%WATSON CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $1k → 9%WATSON CHILDRENS SHELTER: $1k → 9%WATSON CHILDRENS SHELTER: $1k → 9%MISSOULA YOUTH HOMES: $1k → 9%MISSOULA YOUTH HOMES: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 25% of Marshall and Mary Brondum Special Assistance Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in MT; by stated purpose, 89%.

Marshall and Mary Brondum Special Assistance Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$360k · 29 repeat orgs$947k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 74 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
232

Total granted

$360k
$732k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+31%

Still filing today

34%
3%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $215k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $25k · revenue +5%
  • RT
    RADIO TALKING BOOK SERVICE INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $23k · revenue +23%
  • MV
    MISSION VALLEY SENIOR CENTER INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • L
    LIFTT
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $14k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Partnership Health Center Inc

Partnership health center ensures that accessible, comprehensive primary healthcare is provided to the medically underserved population in our region, through a partnership of community resources.

—
2
Habitat for Humanity Missoula Inc

Habitat for humanity of missoula is a nonprofit, ecumenical, christian housing ministry dedicated to the elimination of poverty housing in our community and throughout the world.

—
3
Missoula Developmental Service Corp

Mdsc, doing business as the arc western montana, provides people with developmental disabilities and their families with the skills, tools, and supports that foster self-determination and inclusion, so they thrive as integrated members in…

—
4
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Western Montana

Keeping families with a sick child/children close to the care and resources they need, when it matters the most.

Health
5
Missoula Area Agency On Aging Inc

Missoula aging services promotes the independence, dignity, and health of older adults and those that care for them through advocacy, education, services, and volunteer opportunities.

Human Services
6
Living Independently for Today and Tomorrow Inc

Provide assistance to people with diabilities so that they can live independently.

Human Services
7
MountainCare Inc

MountainCare provides supportive and enriching Adult Day Services enabling older adults to age in place. We aspire to be an unwavering partner for adults and those who care for them. Together, we encourage independence, provide meaningful…

Health
8
Center for Mental Health

The center for mental health partners with people and communities to produce exceptional mental health and substance abuse services.

—
9
Empower Mt

Empowermt creates a more just and inclusive society by developing youth and adult leaders who work to end mistreatment, correct systemic inequities, and strengthen communities. empowermt envisions a montana where each person is respected…

Human Services
10
Montana Hospital Association

Montana hospital association is the principal advocate for the interests of members in their efforts to improve the health status of the communities they serve.

—
11
Mental Health Cooperative Inc

Mental health cooperative inc. (mhc) provides integrated health services that include behavioral health care, primary health care, addiction services, and community-based care management. mhc also provides emergency psychiatric services…

Health
12
Mission Mountain Enterprises

To provide group home and work/day habilitation services to developmentally and intellectually disabled adults under contract with the state of montana, department of health and human series, developmental disabilities division.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mountain Home Montana Inc; the most unlike its peers is My Glacier Village. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 335 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YWCA: $55,000 · OtherYWCAMISSOULA AGING SERVICES: $38,000 · Other+181 more: $922,119 · Other+181 moreANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC: $25,000 · HealthRADIO TALKING BOOK SERVICE INC: $23,000 · HealthPARTNERS HOPE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthCATALYST FOR CHANGE: $5,000 · HealthTAMARACK GRIEF RESOURCE CENTER INC: $3,000 · HealthMISSION VALLEY SENIOR CENTER INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH HOMES: $5,000 · Human ServicesMY GLACIER VILLAGE: $5,000 · Human ServicesWATSON CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesPEACE PLACE: $3,000 · Human ServicesMOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesNORTH-MISSOULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $12,317 · Community ImprovementMISSOULA FOOD BANK & COMMUNITY CENTER: $5,000 · Food & NutritionCHILDRENS ONCOLOGY CAMP FOUNDATION: $4,035 · Recreation & SportsLIBERTY PLACE INC: $3,000 · PhilanthropyMISSOULA INTERFAITH COLLABORATIVE: $2,824 · Religion
Other$1,015,119Health$66,000Human Services$48,000Community Improvement$12,317Food & Nutrition$5,000Recreation & Sports$4,035Philanthropy$3,000Religion$2,824

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMontana Association for the Blind Inc: $25,800 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRADIO TALKING BOOK SERVICE INC: $23,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetMISSION VALLEY SENIOR CENTER INC: $15,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH-MISSOULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $12,317 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetIntermountain Deaconess Childrens Services: $6,139 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH HOMES: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMY GLACIER VILLAGE: $5,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetMISSOULA FOOD BANK & COMMUNITY CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDRENS ONCOLOGY CAMP FOUNDATION: $4,035 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWATSON CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTAMARACK GRIEF RESOURCE CENTER INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMISSOULA INTERFAITH COLLABORATIVE: $2,824 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Montana Association for the Blind Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC ↗
  • Who funds RADIO TALKING BOOK SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION VALLEY SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH-MISSOULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS HOPE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dennis & Phyllis Washington FoundationMT35.8× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Town Pump Charitable Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · Sample Foundation Inc · Gianforte Family Charitable Trust · Montana Community Foundation Inc · Max and Betty Swanson Foundation · The Bill & Rosemary Gallagher Foundation · Treacy Foundation · Headwaters Health Foundation of Western Montana · M J Murdock Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marshall and Mary Brondum Special Assistance Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marshall and Mary Brondum Special Assistance Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Marshall and Mary Brondum Special Assistance Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Marshall and Mary Brondum Special Assistance Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 335 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marshall and Mary Brondum Special Assistance’s filings →

    More from the funding graph