Skip to content
Marsha and Jeffrey Perelman Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Marsha and Jeffrey Perelman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$528k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$432k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$2.7MReligion$430kEducation$199kScience & Tech$105kCommunity Improvement$70kAnimals$61kHousing & Shelter$35kCrime & Legal$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $89k
  • $250k+1 grant · $432k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$9.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DIA ART FOUNDATION$431,667
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$30,000
FRANKLIN INSTITUTE$25,000
PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART$13,500
BARNES FOUNDATION$10,000
PROJECT HOME$10,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA$5,000
BEYOND CELIAC$1,000
RENDELL CENTER FOR CIVICS & CIVIC ENGAGEMENT$1,000
BRIDLEWILD TRAILS ASSOCIATION$500
MARCH OF DIMES$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PROJECT HOME: $25k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $10k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 16 repeat orgs$280k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
28

Total granted

$3.2M
$279k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+30%

Still filing today

94%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthPublic BenefitAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    DIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +38%
  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF CALDER GARDENS
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +362%
  • TB
    THE BARNES FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $135k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • HW
    Humane World for Animals Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -20%
  • TF
    THE FUND FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIAgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +157%
  • AP
    Acct Philly
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Phillips Collection

The phillips collection is the oldest museum of modern and contemporary art in the u.s. in addition to presentation of works from the permanent collection and special exhibitions, the museum maintains active educational, academic,…

Arts & Culture
2
The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia

The mission is "to understand the natural world and inspire everyone to care for it." the academy implements its mission through understanding the diversity of life; developing and applying science to protect the environment; and informing…

Science & Tech
3
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
4
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
5
Philadelphia Convention & Visitors Bureau

The philadelphia convention & visitors bureau (phlcvb) is the official tourism promotion agency for the city of philadelphia globally, and the sales and marketing agency for the pennsylvania convention center (pcc). phlcvb markets…

—
6
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
7
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
8
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
9
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
10
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
11
The Philadelphia Award
—
12
Public Trust

Public Trust is a non-profit organization on the campus of the University of Pennsylvania that fosters learning, creativity, and collaboration in support of justice and equality.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mann Center for the Performing Arts; the most unlike its peers is The Henry Foundation for Botanical Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/43
Grantees still filing
29/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $1,351,667 · Arts & CultureDIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INCTRUSTEES OF CALDER GARDENS: $1,000,000 · Arts & CultureTRUSTEES OF CALDER GARDENSTHE BARNES FOUNDATION: $135,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE: $105,000 · Arts & Culture+12 more: $177,000 · Arts & Culture+12 moreBETH DAVID REFORM CONGREGATION: $430,000 · OtherBETH DAVID REFOR…Acct Philly: $25,000 · OtherTHE FUND FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA: $25,000 · Other+15 more: $65,500 · Other+15 moreTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $130,000 · EducationIsland Academy Inc: $15,000 · EducationSCIENCE LEADERSHIP ACADEMY HOME AND SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $12,000 · EducationTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · Education+2 more: $6,500 · EducationHumane World for Animals Inc: $50,000 · AnimalsPennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $10,000 · Animals+1 more: $1,000 · AnimalsLEADERSHIP PHILADELPHIA: $45,000 · Public BenefitTHE RENDELL CENTER FOR CIVICS AND CIVIC ENGAGEMENT: $2,000 · Public Benefit+1 more: $1,000 · Public BenefitPROJECT HOME: $35,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN AGAINST ABUSE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $30,000 · Civil Rights
Arts & Culture$2,768,667Other$545,500Education$173,500Animals$61,000Public Benefit$48,000Human Services$40,000Civil Rights$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $1,351,667 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF CALDER GARDENS: $1,000,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetTHE BARNES FOUNDATION: $135,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $130,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE: $105,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $59,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEADERSHIP PHILADELPHIA: $45,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetPROJECT HOME: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FUND FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRYN MAWR THEATRE FILM INSTITUTE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTORM KING ART CENTER: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetIsland Academy Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWHYY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Preservation Foundation of Palm Beach Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFRINGEARTS: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR PUBLIC ART: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN AGAINST ABUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCystic Fibrosis Research Fund Inc: $3,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUPLIFT SOLUTIONS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PHILADELPHIA CITIZEN: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBRIDLEWILD TRAILS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTHE RENDELL CENTER FOR CIVICS AND CIVIC ENGAGEMENT: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMDRC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA METRO WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HENRY FOUNDATION FOR BOTANICAL RESEARCH: $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBUSINESS EXECUTIVES FOR NATIONAL SECURITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATRIOTS COVE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The William Penn Foun…The Philadelphia Foun…The Snider FoundationThe Honickman Foundat…Hess Foundation IncThe Neubauer Family F…Independence Foundati…The Brind FoundationThe Leslie Miller and…Future Standard Found…The Barra Foundation …Henry Dolfinger 2 Tru…
The William Penn FoundationPA23.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The William Penn Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · The Snider Foundation · The Honickman Foundation · Hess Foundation Inc · The Neubauer Family Foundation · Independence Foundation · The Brind Foundation · The Leslie Miller and Richard Worley Foundation · Future Standard Foundation · The Barra Foundation Inc · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marsha and Jeffrey Perelman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marsha and Jeffrey Perelman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marsha and Jeffrey Perelman Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home