Skip to content

· Public charity

Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others.

$249M
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
22
States reached
$730k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Science & Tech$10MHealth$8.4MEducation$2.7MHuman Services$1.8MCommunity Improvement$1.5MRecreation & Sports$373kFood & Nutrition$109kSocial Science$64kOther$0
02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 47 grants below total $5,242,826, the rows itemized in this filing. The $249,057,808 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $243,814,982 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $459k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $2.1M
  • $250k+7 grants · $2.6M
$52,105
Median grant
22
States reached
$2.2B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Medical College of Wisconsin$730,204
Clearflame Engines Inc$400,000
Indiana University$332,905
Jacintopa Maria Muriel Garcia Leon$325,963
Lutheran Social Services$304,863
Regents of the University of Michigan$281,975
Board of Regents-University of WI System-Madison$253,009
Board of Regents-University of WI System-Madison$236,556
John Deere Shared Services Inc$213,528
University of Miami$212,434
Carnegie Mellon University$177,868
Northwestern University$145,404
CZERO Inc$143,144
University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc$139,252
Medical College of Wisconsin$137,138
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Data You Can Use Inc: $12k → 17%Lutheran Social Services: $343k → 17%Lutheran Social Services: $305k → 17%Council for Jewish Elderly: $6k → 14%Lutheran Social Services: $285k → 17%Lutheran Social Services: $233k → 17%Lutheran Social Services: $197k → 17%Lutheran Social Services: $173k → 17%United Community Center: $123k → 17%Lutheran Social Services: $57k → 17%United Community Center: $53k → 17%United Community Center: $30k → 17%United Community Center: $17k → 17%Lutheran Social Services: $16k → 17%Lutheran Social Services: $5k → 17%African American Breastfeeding Network Inc: $33k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23M · 58 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

58 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

58
38

Total granted

$23M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+28%

Still filing today

40%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $655k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $6.3M · revenue +54%
  • LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +39%
  • UO
    University of Miami
    6× · 2020–2025 · $709k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • RI
    Rehabilitation Institute of Chicagograduated
    one grant, 2017 · $108k · revenue +31%
  • Vanderbilt Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $106k · revenue +65%
  • CO
    CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI
    one grant, 2017 · $60k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
2
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
3
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
4
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
5
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
9
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
12
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Widener University; the most unlike its peers is Seattle University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 107 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/43
Grantees still filing
30/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Wisconsin Madison: $1,420,468 · OtherUniversity of Wisconsin MadisonMahle Powertrain LLC: $1,026,802 · OtherMahle Powertrain LLCIndiana University School of Medicine: $770,541 · OtherIndiana University School of MedicineCZERO Inc: $742,602 · OtherCZERO IncTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $635,921 · OtherVIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITY: $585,011 · OtherAlzheimer's Association: $561,693 · OtherRAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES RESEARCH CENTER: $432,119 · OtherVarian Medical Systems: $418,677 · OtherFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY: $418,195 · OtherClearflame Engines Inc: $400,000 · Other+58 more: $4,582,807 · Other+58 moreTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $6,281,520 · EducationTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INCUniversity of Miami: $708,619 · EducationUniversity of MiamiUniversity of Chicago: $453,640 · EducationUniversity of Chicago+16 more: $1,061,706 · Education+16 moreLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN INC: $1,613,638 · Human ServicesUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $222,727 · Human Services+3 more: $51,120 · Human ServicesNEAR WEST SIDE PARTNERS INC: $1,409,228 · Community ImprovementAURORA HEALTH CARE INC: $525,665 · HealthMental Health America of Wisconsin Inc: $119,653 · HealthRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $108,184 · HealthRush University Medical Center: $36,229 · HealthVERSITI INC: $33,400 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $29,567 · Health+3 more: $30,271 · HealthNorthwestern University: $373,472 · Recreation & SportsNEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC: $18,750 · Recreation & SportsNEW BEGINNINGS ARE POSSIBLE INC: $40,000 · PhilanthropyWALNUT WAY CONSERVATION CORPORATION: $26,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$11,994,836Education$8,505,485Human Services$1,887,485Community Improvement$1,409,228Health$882,969Recreation & Sports$392,222Philanthropy$40,000Housing & Shelter$26,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $6,281,520 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN INC: $1,613,638 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetNEAR WEST SIDE PARTNERS INC: $1,409,228 over 5y, 21% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $708,619 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAURORA HEALTH CARE INC: $525,665 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $453,640 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $373,472 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $270,859 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $222,727 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetUniversity of Georgia Research Foundation Inc: $185,446 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $179,672 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $163,976 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMental Health America of Wisconsin Inc: $119,653 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetHOFSTRA UNIVERSITY: $117,577 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $108,184 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University: $106,466 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNMC INC: $84,194 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOGLETHORPE UNIVERSITY INC: $64,429 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $63,198 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIDENER UNIVERSITY: $52,696 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $47,291 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $46,830 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE UNIVERSITY: $46,251 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW BEGINNINGS ARE POSSIBLE INC: $40,000 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $36,229 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVERSITI INC: $33,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAFRICAN AMERICAN BREASTFEEDING NETWORK: $33,120 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING: $31,574 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $29,567 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWALNUT WAY CONSERVATION CORPORATION: $26,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBall State University Foundation Inc: $24,720 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNew York University: $24,285 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC: $18,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY DOMINGUEZ HILLS TORO AUXILIARY PARTNERS: $17,263 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC: $17,071 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $16,829 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRISTO REY JESUIT CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDATA YOU CAN USE INC: $12,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPACIFIC NORTHWEST UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $9,697 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCHWAB REHABILITATION HOSPITAL AND CARE NETWORK: $7,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $6,802 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN INC ↗
  • Who funds NEAR WEST SIDE PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds AURORA HEALTH CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds Carnegie Mellon University ↗
  • Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE ↗
  • Who funds Mental Health America of Wisconsin Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI21.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc · University of Notre Dame du Lac · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Folds of Honor Foundation · Waukesha County Community Foundation · American Chemical Society · Johns Hopkins University · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Tulsa Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marquette University funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marquette University. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Marquette University?

Find your warmest path to Marquette University through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 107 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Marquette University’s filings →

More from the funding graph