Skip to content

· Private foundation

Maroun Family Foundation Cash

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$238k
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$385kReligion$220kHuman Services$95kEducation$84kPhilanthropy$70kInternational$40kArts & Culture$16kPublic Benefit$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k30 grants · $118k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MASS GENERAL HOSPITAL$100,000
CHERISH THE CHILDREN FOUNDATION$10,000
SEREOLIPI NOMADIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,000
MOULTONBOROUGH ACADEMY$9,750
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$9,000
GRANITE UNITED WAY$7,500
TEMPLE BNAI ISRAEL$5,000
MOTHERS HELPING MOTHERS$5,000
Greater Lakes Region Charitable Fund for$5,000
CONNECTIONS EDUCATION CENTER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS COUNCIL 531$5,000
Friends of Eim Inc$5,000
VETERANS COUNT CHARITABLE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHERISH THE CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%CHERISH THE CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%CHERISH THE CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%CHERISH THE CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
ID
IL
WI
NY
MA
NV
PA
CT
CA
CO
MD
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$777k · 23 repeat orgs$226k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
32

Total granted

$777k
$179k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
-13%

Still filing today

35%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePublic BenefitInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $48k · revenue +74%
  • GU
    GRANITE UNITED WAY
    5× · 2020–2025 · $48k · revenue +32%
  • SN
    SEREOLIPI NOMADIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $40k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • MG
    MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2020 · $45k
  • MS
    MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +17%
  • HW
    Homes With Hope Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
2
New England Fishermen's Stewardship Association

Alliance of wild harvesters of the waters off of new england dedicated, to educating the public about how best to manage our seafood resources through sound science & best practices of conversation used by fishermen

—
3
Northeast Wilderness Trust Corporation

Northeast wilderness trust is a regional land trust working to preserve and restore forever-wild landscapes for nature and people in new york, vermont, new hampshire, maine, massachusetts and connecticut.

Environment
4
Northeast Medical Group Inc

To render medical treatment to patients without regard to ability to pay for such treatment, and to promote a high quality of medical care and other services for the benefit of all persons in the communities it serves.

—
5
New Hampshire Lakes Association Inc

To restore and preserve the health of new hampshire's lakes.

Environment
6
Monadnock Community Hospital

Monadnock Community Hospital is committed to improving the health and well-being of our community. We will elevate the health of our community by providing accessible, high quality and value based care.

Health
7
Southern New Hampshire Medical Center

Southern New Hampshire Medical Center is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve. Southern New Hampshire Medical Center is a provider of choice, delivering…

Health
8
Dartmouth Health Home Care Inc

We are dedicated to delivering outstanding home health and hospice services that enrich the lives of the people we serve.

—
9
Memorial Hospital Foundation at North Conway Inc

To perform the functions of, and to carry out the purposes of its supported organization, the memorial hospital at north conway, nh. to hold and manage property for the tax-exempt uses in direct furtherance (continued on schedule o)of the…

Health
10
Southwestern Vermont Medical Center

Southwestern vermont health care exists to provide exceptional health care and comfort to the people we serve. see schedule o for additional details.

Health
11
National Marine Mammal Foundation Inc

The nmmf's mission is to improve and protect life for marine mammals, humans, and our shared oceans through science, service, and education. our vision is to be the leading laboratory in marine mammal science, where critical questions…

Animals
12
Ndh Foundation

The mission of ndh foundation is to raise funds, reinvest and administer these funds and make distriubtions to northern dutchess hospital and other not-for-profit affiliates.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish of New Hampshire Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cast Water Safety Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
8/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MASS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $250,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL HOSPITALST CHARLES BORROMEO CATHOLIC CHURCH: $148,650 · OtherST CHARLES BORROMEO CATHOLIC CHURCHGRANITE UNITED WAY: $47,500 · OtherGRANITE UNITED WAYMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $45,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITALMOULTONBOROUGH ACADEMY: $27,750 · Other+53 more: $276,500 · Other+53 moreCHERISH THE CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Human ServicesMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesHomes With Hope Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $48,000 · HealthBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $7,500 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthSEREOLIPI NOMADIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF EIM INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureNEW HAMPSHIRE BOAT MUSEUM: $11,000 · Arts & CultureMAKE-A-WISH OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureMOTHERS HELPING MOTHERS INC: $15,000 · Community ImprovementCAST WATER SAFETY FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Philanthropy
Other$795,400Human Services$60,000Health$56,500International$40,000Arts & Culture$28,500Community Improvement$15,000Philanthropy$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $48,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGRANITE UNITED WAY: $47,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSEREOLIPI NOMADIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetCHERISH THE CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetMOTHERS HELPING MOTHERS INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF EIM INC: $15,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE BOAT MUSEUM: $11,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHomes With Hope Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCAST WATER SAFETY FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION DELTA DOG INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMBLE GRUNT WORK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTETON COUNTY SEARCH & RESCUE: $3,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF POP WHALEN: $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetLakes Region Visiting Nurse Association: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds GRANITE UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds SEREOLIPI NOMADIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHERISH THE CHILDREN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MOTHERS HELPING MOTHERS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF EIM INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE BOAT MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds Homes With Hope Inc ↗
  • Who funds CAST WATER SAFETY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION DELTA DOG INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds SQUAM LAKES NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HUMBLE GRUNT WORK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH16.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Maroun Family Foundation Cash funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Maroun Family Foundation Cash. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 23%
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Maroun Family Foundation Cash’s filings →

More from the funding graph