Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marni McKinney Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$128kArts & Culture$92kEnvironment$83kHuman Services$38kHealth$29kYouth Development$17kCivil Rights$16kInternational$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$834k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA$12,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$6,000
WOMEN'S FUND OF CENTRAL INDIANA$5,000
INDIANAPOLIS ART CENTER$4,000
ACLU FOUNDATION$4,000
SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION$3,000
THE JULIAN CENTER$3,000
INDIANAPOLIS MUSEUM OF ART$2,500
WALLOON LAKE TRUST & CONSERVANCY$2,500
THE CARTER CENTER$2,000
CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT$2,000
WHEELER MISSION MINISTERIES$2,000
DRESS FOR SUCCESS$1,500
GIRLS INC OF INDIANAPOLIS$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE JULIAN CENTER: $3k → 16%THE JULIAN CENTER: $3k → 16%THE JULIAN CENTER: $3k → 16%THE JULIAN CENTER: $3k → 16%THE JULIAN CENTER: $3k → 16%THE JULIAN CENTER: $3k → 16%THE JULIAN CENTER: $3k → 16%THE JULIAN CENTER: $3k → 16%THE JULIAN CENTER: $2k → 16%WHEELER MISSION MINISTERIES: $3k → 16%WHEELER MISSION MINISTERIES: $2k → 16%WHEELER MISSION MINISTERIES: $2k → 16%WHEELER MISSION MINISTERIES: $2k → 16%WHEELER MISSION MINISTERIES: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$460k · 24 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
2

Total granted

$460k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+86%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IA
    INDIANAPOLIS ART CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +143%
  • HE
    Hoosier Environmental Council Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $35k · revenue +219%
  • WL
    WALLOON LAKE ASSOCIATION AND CONSERVANCY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • PT
    PHOENIX THEATRE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +86%
  • FH
    FAIR HAVEN FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
The Indianapolis Foundation Inc

To mobilize people, ideas, and investments to make this a community where all individuals have equitable opportunity to reach their full potential - no matter place, race or identity.

Community Improvement
3
The International Center Inc

The international center is a catalyst to inform, convene, and connect public, private, and civic global objectives in indiana. for nearly half a century, the international center has served as a guide to the world's cultural landscape and…

—
4
University of Indianapolis

The University of Indianapolis champions lifelong learning through relevant and innovative education that fosters experiential learning, diverse perspectives, service for impact, and a global mindset.

Education
5
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
6
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health
7
Indiana University Alumni Association Inc

The indiana university alumni association activates and supports the global alumni network- encouraging alumni to grow a lifelong connection with indiana university, and inspiring their ongoing generosity toward each other and the…

—
8
Cicp Foundation Inc

Cicp foundation, inc. (the foundation) operates exclusively for the benefit of and carries out the mission of central indiana corporate partnership, inc. (cicp) by engaging in and supporting activities in furtherance of purposes that are…

Community Improvement
9
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
10
Indiana University Health Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
Indiana Association of Realtors Inc

To serve its members and local associations by providing leadership programs and services to sustain a healthy real estate market in indiana. in providing these services, the association will raise the standards of the real estate…

—
12
Indiana Association of United Ways Inc

Indiana united way is the leading voice to advocate, engage, and partner with a strong united way network and key stakeholders to advance human well-being throughout indiana.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Girls Incorporated of Greater Indianapolis. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $104,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA IN…Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc: $41,000 · PhilanthropyCentral Indiana Community Founda…PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $30,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODACLU FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherACLU FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $13,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDRESS FOR SUCCESS: $13,500 · OtherDRESS FOR SUCCESSINDIANAPOLIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $9,000 · OtherINDIANAPOLIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAINDIANA COALITION OF HOUSING & HOMELESS ISSUES: $7,500 · OtherGIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS: $13,500 · OtherGIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER IND…CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT INC: $12,000 · OtherCENTER FOR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT…Butler University: $8,500 · OtherButler UniversityFAIRBANKS HOSPITAL INC: $6,000 · Other+5 more: $18,000 · Other+5 moreINDIANAPOLIS ART CENTER INC: $41,000 · Arts & CultureINDIANAPOLIS ART…Newfields Inc: $22,500 · Arts & CultureNewfields IncNUVO CULTURAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureNUVO CULTURAL FO…PHOENIX THEATRE INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureHoosier Environmental Council Inc: $34,667 · EnvironmentHoosier Enviro…SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $32,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FO…THE JULIAN CENTER INC: $26,000 · Human ServicesWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $9,500 · Human ServicesWALLOON LAKE ASSOCIATION AND CONSERVANCY: $21,000 · Food & NutritionTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $14,000 · International
Philanthropy$145,000Other$151,500Arts & Culture$71,500Environment$66,667Human Services$35,500Food & Nutrition$21,000International$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $104,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Indiana Community Foundation Inc: $41,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANAPOLIS ART CENTER INC: $41,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetHoosier Environmental Council Inc: $34,667 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $32,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JULIAN CENTER INC: $26,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNewfields Inc: $22,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWALLOON LAKE ASSOCIATION AND CONSERVANCY: $21,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS: $13,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT INC: $12,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetButler University: $8,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRBANKS HOSPITAL INC: $6,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNUVO CULTURAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 5y, 9.7% of budgetHarrison Center for the Arts Inc: $4,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFAIR HAVEN FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds INDIANAPOLIS ART CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Hoosier Environmental Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE JULIAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Newfields Inc ↗
  • Who funds WALLOON LAKE ASSOCIATION AND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Butler University ↗
  • Who funds FAIRBANKS HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds NUVO CULTURAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Harrison Center for the Arts Inc ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds FAIR HAVEN FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncIN26.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Eugene & Marilyn Glick Foundation · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Griffith Family Foundation Inc · Christel DeHaan Family Foundation Inc · Maurer Family Foundation Inc · Richard M Fairbanks Foundation Inc · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · McKinney Family Foundation Inc · Allen Whitehill Clowes Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marni McKinney Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marni McKinney Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Marni McKinney Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Marni McKinney Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marni McKinney’s filings →

    More from the funding graph