Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marks Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$120k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$178kArts & Culture$127kEnvironment$30kReligion$27kPhilanthropy$24kEducation$23k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $90k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAWRENCE & MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$16,000
LAWRENCE & MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$15,000
LAWRENCE & MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$15,000
LAWRENCE & MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$14,000
YALE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$10,000
CHILDREN'S OF ALABAMA$10,000
AMAZING GRACE FOUNDATION$10,000
LAWRENCE & MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$9,000
DR MARTIN LUTHER KING SCHOLARSHIP$6,000
CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL$6,000
COMMUNITY SPEAKS OUT$5,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Marks Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in CT; by stated purpose, 90%.

Marks Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$366k · 6 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

$366k
$7k

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
HealthArts & CultureEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LM
    LAWRENCE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $158k · revenue +57%
  • GA
    Garde Arts Center Inc
    5× · 2017–2023 · $127k · revenue +144%
  • DP
    DENISON PEQUOTSEPOS NATURE CENTER
    2× · 2017–2018 · $30k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fairfield University

To establish, organize, maintain and conduct an institution for secondary, undergraduate and graduate education in the state of connecticut, and to perform such other works of education, charity and religion. see schedule o.

Education
2
Yale New Haven Hospital

The mission of ynhh is to provide innovative and excellent patient care, teaching, research, and service to the communities it serves.

Health
3
Connecticut Children's Medical Center

Connecticut children's medical center is dedicated to improving the physical and emotional health of children through family-centered care, research, education and advocacy. we embrace discovery, teamwork, integrity and excellence in all…

Health
4
The Connecticut Center for Nursing Workforce Inc

To foster collaborations to ensure a highly educated, diverse and sustainable nursing workforce to support the healthcare needs of connecticut residents.

Health
5
Long Island Community Hospital At Nyu Langone Health

The goals and objectives of the corporation are as follows:(a) to operate and maintain a nonsectarian, general hospital at one or more locations for the furnishing of inpatient, ambulatory, restorative, preventative and emergency medical…

—
6
Greenwich Hospital

To provide healthcare services.

Health
7
The Greenwich Hospital Endowment Fund Inc

Supporting organization of greenwich hospital

Health
8
The Jewish High School of Connecticut

The jewish high school of connecticut is dedicated to educate jewish youth for whom jewish values and traditions shape and guide their lives and for whom learning and responsible actions are foundational for achievement.

—
9
Bridgeport Hospital

To operate an acute care hospital in bridgeport, connecticut for the care and treatment of persons suffering from disease or other physical or mental conditions without regard to race, color, creed, sex, age or ability to pay.

Health
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
Northeast Medical Group Inc

To render medical treatment to patients without regard to ability to pay for such treatment, and to promote a high quality of medical care and other services for the benefit of all persons in the communities it serves.

—
12
St Joseph's Medical Pc

We, st. joseph's medical and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. joseph's medical is a member of st. joseph's health and trinity health.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yale University; the most unlike its peers is Community Speaks Out Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LAWRENCE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC: $157,500 · HealthLAWRENCE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INCThe Children's Hospital of Alabama: $15,000 · HealthThe Children's Hospital of Alabama+1 more: $5,000 · HealthGarde Arts Center Inc: $127,075 · Arts & CultureGarde Arts Center IncCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF EASTERN CT: $20,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUN…CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL BETH ISRAEL SYNAGOGUE: $16,500 · OtherCONGREGATION B…AMAZING GRACE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherAMAZING GRACE …JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF: $7,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNI…DENISON PEQUOTSEPOS NATURE CENTER: $30,000 · EnvironmentYale University: $10,000 · EducationDR MARTIN LUTHER KING SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $6,000 · EducationTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · Human Services
Health$177,500Arts & Culture$127,075Other$53,500Environment$30,000Education$16,000Human Services$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAWRENCE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC: $157,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGarde Arts Center Inc: $127,075 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetDENISON PEQUOTSEPOS NATURE CENTER: $30,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetThe Children's Hospital of Alabama: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYale University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDR MARTIN LUTHER KING SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $6,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY SPEAKS OUT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chelsea Groton FoundationCT15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chelsea Groton Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marks Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marks Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • Garde Arts Center Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Dr Martin Luther King Scholarship Fund: 8% of income from government
  • Denison Pequotsepos Nature Center: 0% of income from government
  • Lawrence Memorial Hospital Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Marks Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Marks Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Marks Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph