Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Market Lubbock Economic Development Corporation

To enhance and encourage economic development and job creation and facilitate the development of new industries.

$3.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
46
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 74% of MARKET LUBBOCK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 46 grants below total $2,967,105 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,093,748 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $126,643 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k28 grants · $608k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $876k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.4M
$24,922
Median grant
1
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUBBOCK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE$1,000,000
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY$434,500
CAVENDAR REAL ESTATE OF LUBBOCK II LLC$125,000
CAVENDAR REAL ESTATE OF LUBBOCK LLC$125,000
DIXIE PARTNERS II LP$125,000
LBB HWY 84 LLC$125,000
LEVELLAND ISD$99,350
CITY OF LUBBOCK CHURCH INC$80,397
LUBBOCK EXPERIENCE INC (DBA LCAF)$75,000
BROWNFIELD ISD$69,207
TRU DEAN REALTY LLC$52,474
HALE CENTER ISD$44,488
LOCKNEY ISD$34,809
MIXED NUTZ LEASING$33,518
DENVER CITY ISD$30,748
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Q-505 LLC: $125k → 13%MCCOURT PLACE LC: $100k → 15%LBB HWY 84 LLC: $125k → 16%SOUTHERN STAR LUBBOCK LP: $125k → 16%JAC ENTERPRISES LLC: $64k → 17%TEINERT COMMERCIAL BUILDING: $125k → 20%BROWNFIELD ISD: $69k → 21%TAKE 5 PROPERTIES SPV LLC: $75k → 10%BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP- NOW BASF: $50k → 11%CAVENDAR REAL ESTATE OF LUBBOCK LLC: $125k → 16%TRU DEAN REALTY LLC: $52k → 17%BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP: $50k → 11%CAVENDER REAL ESTATE OF LUBBOCK III LLC: $125k → 16%SOUTH PLAINS ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS: $1.0M → 17%HALE CENTER ISD: $44k → 22%BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP: $50k → 11%CAVENDAR REAL ESTATE OF LUBBOCK II LLC: $125k → 16%VERITAS MEDICAL: $144k → 17%BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP- NOW BASF: $50k → 11%LEVELLAND ISD: $99k → 15%BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP: $50k → 11%2 DOCS BREWING: $75k → 17%CONCORD MEDICAL GROUP: $52k → 17%RESIDE LUBBOCK LLC: $41k → 17%MVSC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT: $42k → 17%MC & MC PROPERTIES LC: $44k → 17%CITY OF LUBBOCK: $2.0M → 17%LUBBOCK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE: $1.0M → 17%LUBBOCK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE: $1.0M → 17%LUBBOCK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE: $1.0M → 17%CITY OF LUBBOCK: $135k → 17%METRO TOWERS HOUSING: $125k → 17%WESTERN BANK: $125k → 17%N2 ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS LLC: $125k → 17%RAMAR COMMUNICATIONS: $125k → 17%THE BETTY CONDRA SCHOOL FOR EDUCATION INNOVATION: $125k → 17%DISCOVERY HEALTHCARE: $99k → 17%LUBBOCK EXPERIENCE INC: $95k → 17%CITY OF LUBBOCK: $80k → 17%1500 BROADWAY PARTNERS: $79k → 17%LUBBOCK EXPERIENCE INC (DBA LCAF): $75k → 17%LUBBOCK CULTURAL ARTS FOUNDATION: $75k → 17%LUBBOCK EXPERIENCE INC (DBA LCAF): $75k → 17%LUBBOCK CULTURAL ARTS FOUNDATION: $75k → 17%RTGS BROADWAY DEVELOPMENT LP: $60k → 17%LUBBOCK ENTERTAINING AND PERMORFING ARTS ASSOCIATION: $60k → 17%THE CHARLES ADAMS STUDIO PROJECT (CASP): $57k → 17%WEST FAMILY HOSPITALITY GROUP: $42k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.8M · 21 repeat orgs$4.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +113% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
65

Total granted

$9.8M
$3.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+113%
+16%

Still filing today

24%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LE
    LUBBOCK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE
    4× · 2018–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +158%
  • LE
    LUBBOCK EXPERIENCE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $395k · revenue +113% · 29% of their budget
  • LE
    LUBBOCK ENTERTAINMENT AND PERFORMING ARTS ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2019–2024 · $100k · revenue +157%

Funded once

  • SP
    SOUTH PLAINS ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M
  • VM
    VERITAS MEDICAL
    one grant, 2019 · $144k
  • WB
    WESTERN BANK
    one grant, 2019 · $125k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lubbock Chamber of Commerce Foundation
2
Lubbock Arts Alliance Inc

To foster the creation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts in and around the lubbock community.

Arts & Culture
3
Lubbock County Junior Livestock Association

Promoting agricultural education, leadership and agricultural entrepreneurship in the youth of lubbock county, texas; encouraging and recognizing the achievement of youth in agriculture and livestock management; encouraging youth academic…

Youth Development
4
Lubbock Association of Realtors Inc

Trade Organization of Real Estate Professionals. Promoting the common interest of the Real Estate industry in Lubbock and the surrounding area. To help promote improvement of business conditions in this area.

5
Civic Lubbock Inc

To foster and promote educational, cultural and entertainment programs, to include the visual and performing arts, for the citizens of lubbock and the surrounding area.

Arts & Culture
6
Lubbock Christian School

Lubbock christian school is dedicated to providing a quality environment in which each student will grow in wisdom and stature and in favor with god and man. lcs strives for excellence spiritually, personally, and professionally among…

Education
7
Crime Line of Lubbock Inc %Danny Johnston
8
Community Health Center of Lubbock Inc

Provide quality primary and preventataive health care services to those in need.

Health
9
Llano Chamber of Commerce

To assist the local business, governmental and individual community in developing better business relationships and to increase the local revenue base by encouraging tourism and business development.

10
Lubbock Christian University Foundation

Raising funds to support the activities of lubbock christian university and to fund capital projects for instructional facilities for lubbock christian university.

Education
11
Laramie Chamber Business Alliance

To lead the community in the improvement of the local business environment, creation of jobs and growth of the local tax base in laramie, wyoming.

Community Improvement
12
Lubbock Area United Way Inc

Giving people hope. working to address the root issues of the significant challenges facing our south plains communities to create lasting, positive change.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lubbock Experience Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ports-to-Plains Trade Corridor Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 120 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY — $2,456,938 · OtherTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITYCITY OF LUBBOCK — $2,232,734 · OtherCITY OF LUBBOCKSOUTH PLAINS ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS — $1,000,000 · OtherSOUTH PLAINS ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS+105 more — $5,024,519 · Other+105 moreLUBBOCK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE — $3,000,000 · Community ImprovementLUBBOCK ECONOMIC DEVELO…+2 more — $30,000 · Community ImprovementLUBBOCK EXPERIENCE INC — $395,000 · Arts & CultureLUBBOCK ENTERTAINMENT AND PERFORMING ARTS ASSOCIATION — $100,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CHARLES ADAMS STUDIO PROJECT — $56,500 · Arts & CultureLUBBOCK SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $25,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $10,278 · Arts & CultureWIRE HOLLOW EDUCATION INNOVATION — $125,000 · EducationLUBBOCK COUNTY EXPO CENTER INC — $30,000 · EducationLUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $19,951 · EducationCOVENANT MEDICAL CENTER — $38,943 · Health
Other$10,714,191Community Improvement$3,030,000Arts & Culture$586,778Education$174,951Health$38,943

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLUBBOCK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE — $3,000,000 over 4y, 9.8% of budgetLUBBOCK EXPERIENCE INC — $395,000 over 5y, 29% of budgetWIRE HOLLOW EDUCATION INNOVATION — $125,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetLUBBOCK ENTERTAINMENT AND PERFORMING ARTS ASSOCIATION — $100,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTHE CHARLES ADAMS STUDIO PROJECT — $56,500 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetLUBBOCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $45,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCOVENANT MEDICAL CENTER — $38,943 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUBBOCK COUNTY EXPO CENTER INC — $30,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetLUBBOCK SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetPORTS-TO-PLAINS TRADE CORRIDOR COALITION — $20,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetLUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $19,951 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOUISE HOPKINS UNDERWOOD CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $10,278 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLUBBOCK ANGEL NETWORK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 99% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LUBBOCK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE
  • Who funds LUBBOCK EXPERIENCE INC
  • Who funds WIRE HOLLOW EDUCATION INNOVATION
  • Who funds LUBBOCK ENTERTAINMENT AND PERFORMING ARTS ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds THE CHARLES ADAMS STUDIO PROJECT
  • Who funds LUBBOCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lubbock Economic Development AllianceTX48.9× affinity21 shared granteesties to 8 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lubbock Economic Development Alliance · Ch Foundation Inc · Helen Jones Foundation Inc · Civic Lubbock Inc · Community Foundation of West Texas · Rea Charitable Trust · The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Market Lubbock Economic Development Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 120 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph