Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mark and Amy Garrett Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$250k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Health$54kPublic Safety & Disaster$45kArts & Culture$43kFood & Nutrition$40kEducation$30kReligion$27kHuman Services$25kCrime & Legal$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $165k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$70,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK$20,000
ST JUDE HOSPITAL$15,000
JCC HELEN DILLER PRESCHOOL$15,000
SANDY HOOK PROMISE$15,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE$10,000
SAN JOSE CHILDRENS DISCOVER MUSEUM$10,000
EVERY TOWN FOR GUN SAFETY ACTION FUND$10,000
EAST BAY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS$10,000
KQED$10,000
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$5,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$5,000
JEWISH HEALDSBURG$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $15k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$318k · 11 repeat orgs$126k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
4

Total granted

$318k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+17%

Still filing today

64%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $103k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthCrime & LegalInternationalFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $45k · revenue +36%
  • RE
    REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK
    3× · 2023–2025 · $40k · revenue +17%
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • SO
    SCHOOLS OF THE SACRED HEART-SAN FRANCISCO
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • BC
    BRADY CAMPAIGN TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue -1%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Planned Parenthood California Central Coast

To improve our communities' sexual and reproductive health outcomes through health care, education, and advocacy.

Health
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
4
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
5
Kaiser Foundation for the Advancement of Integrated Health Care

Kaiser foundation for the advancement of integrated health care is a nonprofit 501(c)(4) advocacy organization to engage in proactive advocacy to promote understanding of the benefits of integrated care and coverage, and support of the…

Health
6
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
7
Planned Parenthood of Greater Washington and North Idaho

To provide exceptional reproductive and complementary health care services, honest education, and advocacy for all.

Health
8
Kfhpw Holdings

Supporting kaiser permanente organizations which provide high-quality, affordable health care services to improve the health of our members and the communities we serve.

—
9
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
10
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
11
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
12
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Center of San Francisco; the most unlike its peers is Jewish Community Center of Sonoma County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $120,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONVENT STUART H: $25,000 · OtherCONVENT STUART HSCHOOLS OF THE SACRED HEART-SAN FRANCISCO: $15,000 · OtherSCHOOLS OF THE SACRED HEART-SAN FRANCISCOJCC HELEN DILLER PRESCHOOL: $15,000 · OtherJCC HELEN DILLER PRESCHOOLST JUDE HOSPITAL: $15,000 · OtherST JUDE HOSPITALNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $11,000 · Other+4 more: $6,000 · OtherWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $45,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTR…SAN JOSE CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $20,000 · Arts & CultureSAN JOSE C…East Bay Center for the Performing Arts: $10,000 · Arts & CultureEast Bay C…KQED INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureKQED INCJewish Community Center of Sonoma County: $3,000 · Arts & CultureJewish Com…REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $40,000 · Food & NutritionREDWOOD EM…PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC: $16,033 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $11,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $1,032 · HealthJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $25,000 · Human ServicesSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Crime & LegalEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY ACTION FUND INC: $10,000 · Crime & LegalBRADY CAMPAIGN TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $6,000 · Civil Rights
Other$232,000International$45,000Arts & Culture$43,000Food & Nutrition$40,000Health$28,065Human Services$25,000Crime & Legal$25,000Civil Rights$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAN JOSE CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC: $16,033 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEast Bay Center for the Performing Arts: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKQED INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRADY CAMPAIGN TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Community Center of Sonoma County: $3,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $1,032 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mark and Amy Garrett Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mark and Amy Garrett Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mark and Amy Garrett Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph