Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marie Crowley Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$140k
Granted FY2024still arriving
39
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$310kYouth Development$256kHuman Services$196kArts & Culture$187kRecreation & Sports$169kEducation$128kFood & Nutrition$79kInternational$33kOther$0
02FY2024 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k36 grants · $105k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$2,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUNT FOR A CURE$15,000
NEVADA YOUTH EMPOWERMENT$10,000
PBS$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,500
SOARING ABOVE TEEN CENTER$6,000
SAN LUIS FRIENDS OF THE NRA$5,873
IONIA CO CAREER CENTER$5,000
SE OAKLAHOME STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
SLIVER LAKE FIRE DEPARTMENT$5,000
RIMROCK FOUNDATION$5,000
CHECKERS CLUB$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
NIRAA$5,000
SARANAC VOLUTEER FIRE DEPT$5,000
COWFOLKS CARE$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COWFOLKS CARE: $4k → 16%BOYS TOWN: $5k → 12%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $10k → 8%CAMP CASEY: $3k → 8%COWFOLKS CARE: $1k → 16%BOYS TOWN: $3k → 12%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $10k → 8%COWFOLKS CARE: $1k → 16%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $10k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $10k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $10k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $10k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $3k → 8%WINGS OF HOPE HOSPICE: $500 → 10%WINGS OF HOPE HOSPICE: $500 → 10%DOMESTIC VOILENCE RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 10%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE: $4k → 10%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
SD
OH
PA
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
AZ
TN
SC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 67 repeat orgs$452k to everyone else

67 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 53 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

67
84

Total granted

$1.3M
$366k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+44%

Still filing today

34%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $86k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsHealthArts & CultureEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HUNT FOR A CURE INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $81k · revenue +32% · 62% of their budget
  • IY
    IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $63k · revenue +140%
  • C5
    CHANNEL 5 PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $60k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • RH
    Renown Health Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $22k · revenue +139%
  • TM
    TRUCKEE MEADOWS PARKS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +184%
  • AY
    AUSTIN YOUTH & COMMUNITY FARM INC DBA URBAN ROOTS
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue -18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Healthy Nevada
Health
2
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
3
Northern Nevada Children's Cancer Foundation

The foundation's mission is to enhance the quality of life for children with cancer and their families by providing financial assistance and compassionate support programs while advocating for increased research funds and raising public…

Philanthropy
4
Reno Sparks Chamber of Commerce

We advocate, we inform, and we connect

—
5
Nevada Childhood Cancer Foundation

To provide social, emotional, educational, and psychological support and programs to families of all children diagnosed with life threatening or critical illnesses and provide healing arts and wellness programs to adults touched by cancer…

Health
6
Utah Navajo Health System Inc

To improve quality of life through comprehensive, self-empowered, culturally-sensitive healthcare and amazing customer service.

Health
7
Truckee Trails Foundation Inc

The Truckee Trails Foundation (TTF) is working towards a system of trails and bikeways in and around Truckee, California that will connect people and places, reduce our community's dependence on automobiles, and improve our physical,…

Environment
8
Sierra Nevada Memorial Hospital Foundation

To nurture the spirit of generosity and volunteerism of the community, we focus our philanthropic efforts in fostering quality healthcare of the highest standards for Sierra Nevada Memorial Hospital.

Health
9
Carson Tahoe Regional Healthcare

To enhance the health and well-being of the communities we serve.

Health
10
Unmc Physicians

Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for all individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research and extraordinary patient care.

Health
11
Northern Nevada Hiv Outpatient Program Education and Services

Northern Nevada Hopes provides affordable, high-quality, medical, behavioral health, and support services for all. We are dedicated to building a healthier community by providing coordinated care and support for individuals and family…

Health
12
Nevada Children's Foundation Inc

To support programs providing the highest quality service to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. these services include a residential program at eagle valley children's home and a respite program provided in the…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Chest Inc; the most unlike its peers is River City Bass Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 176 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/47
Grantees still filing
33/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $59,912 · OtherCARE COMPLEX: $59,000 · OtherST VINCENTS: $45,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES N N: $45,000 · Other+149 more: $1,140,969 · Other+149 moreCHANNEL 5 PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureNevada Museum of Art: $40,000 · Arts & CultureRENO PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureHUNT FOR A CURE INC: $81,000 · HealthCARE CHEST OF SIERRA NEVADA: $12,500 · HealthCOMPASSION COMMUNITY CLINIC: $7,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $63,000 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $8,000 · Human ServicesTHE 1701 GROUP FKA ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF RENO-SPARKS: $6,000 · Human ServicesCOWFOLKS CARE: $5,500 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER: $5,000 · Human ServicesCatholic Charities of Northern Nevada: $5,000 · Human Services+2 more: $3,500 · Human ServicesTahoe-Pyramid Trail Inc: $21,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsTRUCKEE MEADOWS PARKS FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsRENO BIKE PROJECT INC: $9,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP ROGER: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsFood Bank of Northern Nevada Inc: $35,000 · Food & NutritionRIVER CITY BASS CLUB INC: $17,500 · PhilanthropyHUNT OF A LIFETIME: $14,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,349,881Arts & Culture$110,000Health$101,500Human Services$96,000Recreation & Sports$66,000Food & Nutrition$35,000Philanthropy$31,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHUNT FOR A CURE INC: $81,000 over 7y, 62% of budgetIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $63,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHANNEL 5 PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetNevada Museum of Art: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFood Bank of Northern Nevada Inc: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEVADA DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $35,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNORTHERN NEVADA INTERNATIONAL CENTER: $32,384 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetATLAS DIY CORPORATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY CHEST INC: $25,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetRenown Health Foundation: $22,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMIRACLE FLIGHTS: $22,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTahoe-Pyramid Trail Inc: $21,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetThe Childrens Cancer Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetRIVER CITY BASS CLUB INC: $17,500 over 7y, 60% of budgetCOMMUNITY SPAY NEUTER INITIATIVE PA: $15,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUCKEE MEADOWS PARKS FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetHUNT OF A LIFETIME: $14,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetURBAN ROOTS GARDEN CLASSROOMS: $11,290 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSierra Nevada College: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEEP TRUCKEE MEADOWS BEAUTIFUL: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetRENO PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRENO BIKE PROJECT INC: $9,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASSION COMMUNITY CLINIC: $7,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetCAMP ROGER: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE 1701 GROUP FKA ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF RENO-SPARKS: $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRIMROCK FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetURBAN LOTUS PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetSIERRA NEVADA JOURNEYS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCatholic Charities of Northern Nevada: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEL TROTTER MINISTRIES: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSARANAC COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $3,950 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN LEGION POST 175: $2,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCAMP CASEY CORPORATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTWO FISH FOUNDATION: $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWINGS OF HOPE HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMicheles Rescue: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HUNT FOR A CURE INC ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds CHANNEL 5 PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC ↗
  • Who funds Nevada Museum of Art ↗
  • Who funds Food Bank of Northern Nevada Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NEVADA DISCOVERY MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN NEVADA INTERNATIONAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ATLAS DIY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CHEST INC ↗
  • Who funds Renown Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLE FLIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds Tahoe-Pyramid Trail Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Childrens Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds RIVER CITY BASS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SPAY NEUTER INITIATIVE PA ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUCKEE MEADOWS PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN YOUTH & COMMUNITY FARM INC DBA URBAN ROOTS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Northern NevadaNV35.9× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Thelma B & Thomas P Hart Foundation · The E L Cord Foundation · Robert Z Hawkins Foundation · The Nell J Redfield Foundation · John Ben Snow Memorial Tr Uw #839158 · Dermody Properties Foundation · Estelle J Kelsey Foundation · The Marshall R Matley Foundation · Renown Health · Tahoe Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marie Crowley Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marie Crowley Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 176 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marie Crowley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph