Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marguerite Listeman Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$203k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$66k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$217kRecreation & Sports$147kHuman Services$108kFood & Nutrition$87kCommunity Improvement$62kEducation$61kHousing & Shelter$50kMembership Benefit$47kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $116k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$65,500
HIGHGROUND$50,000
NEILLSVILLE YOUTH BASEBALL$20,000
NEILLSVILLE AMERICAN LEGION POST 73$17,000
CHRISTMAS ANGEL PROJECT$10,000
NEILLSVILLE IMPROVEMENT CORP$10,000
WARRIOR BOOSTER CLUB$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN$3,000
UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST$3,000
TRACTORS FOR AUTISM & DISABILITIES$2,000
NEILLSVILLE AREA PLAYERS$2,000
CLARK COUNTY JAIL MUSEUM$2,000
UW EXTENSION CENTER CLARK COUNTY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HOUSE OF MERCY: $7k → 10%MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM: $50k → 11%CHRISTMAS ANGEL PROJECT: $13k → 13%MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM: $50k → 11%CHRISTMAS ANGEL PROJECT: $10k → 13%MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM: $50k → 11%CHRISTMAS ANGEL PROJECT: $10k → 13%CHRISTMAS ANGEL PROJECT: $10k → 13%CHRISTMAS ANGEL PROJECT: $10k → 13%CHRISTMAS ANGEL PROJECT: $10k → 13%CITY OF NEILLSVILLE: $70k → 13%CITY OF NEILLSVILLE: $66k → 13%HIGHGROUND: $50k → 13%HIGHGROUND: $50k → 13%HIGHGROUND: $50k → 13%MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER: $50k → 13%CITY OF NEILLSVILLE: $50k → 13%HIGHGROUND: $50k → 13%HIGHGROUND VETERANS MEMORIAL PARK: $35k → 13%NEILLSVILLE AMERICAN LEGION 73: $30k → 13%AMERICAN LEGION POST 73: $30k → 13%NEILLSVILLE IMPROVEMENT CORP: $25k → 13%NEILLSVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $25k → 13%HIGHGROUND VETERANS MEMORIAL PARK: $22k → 13%AMERICAN LEGION POST 73: $20k → 13%NEILLSVILLE YOUTH BASEBALL: $20k → 13%NEILLSVILLE AMERICAN LEGION POST 73: $17k → 13%CITY OF NEILLSVILLE: $16k → 13%CITY OF NEILLSVILLE: $16k → 13%NEILLSVILLE IMPROVEMENT CORP: $15k → 13%AMERICAN LEGION POST 73: $15k → 13%NEILLSVILLE SENIOR CENTER: $11k → 13%NEILLSVILLE IMPROVEMENT CORP: $10k → 13%CLARK COUNTY FORESTRY & PARKS DEPT: $10k → 13%NEILLSVILLE IMPROVEMENT CORP: $10k → 13%AMERICAN LEGION POST 73: $10k → 13%ST JOHNS EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $10k → 13%AGING AND DISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER OF: $10k → 13%NEILSVILLE-GRANTON: $10k → 13%NEILLSVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $10k → 13%CITY OF NEILLSVILLE: $10k → 13%CITY OF NEILLSVILLE POLICE: $9k → 13%WARRIOR BOOSTER CLUB: $6k → 13%NEILLSVILLE BOOSTER CLUB: $6k → 13%NEILLSVILLE BOOSTER CLUB: $6k → 13%NEILLSVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $6k → 13%WARRIOR BOOSTER CLUB: $6k → 13%NEILLSVILLE AMBULANCE SERVICE: $6k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$995k · 19 repeat orgs$254k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +69% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
34

Total granted

$995k
$205k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+32%

Still filing today

21%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationEnvironmentRecreation & SportsEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $150k · revenue +442%
  • AL
    American Legion Post 73
    4× · 2019–2023 · $75k · revenue +69%
  • SPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $15k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • MM
    MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +77%
  • NA
    NEILLSVILLE AMERICAN LEGION 73
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • NS
    NEILLSVILLE SENIOR CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jefferson Chamber of Commerce

Promote economic development in jefferson wi for its members

—
2
Greater Niles Economic Development Full Employment Corporation
—
3
Ellsworth County Economic Development Corporation

Ellsworth county economic development is improving the lives of citizens of ellsworth county through recruitment, retention, and expansion of goods and services offered in ellsworth county.

—
4
Northwest Wisconsin Workforce Investment Board Inc

The northwest wisconsin workforce investment board (nwwib) will create, and continue to improve, an innovative and quality strategic direction for the regional workforce development system.

Public Benefit
5
Eagles Nest Projects Wisconsin

Eagles Nest Projects Wisconsin is a nonprofit educational organization whose primary purpose is to inspire and educate youth through hands-on Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) programs focused on aviation. The…

Education
6
Area Partnership for Economic Expansion

Promote and develop economic expansion in duluth and northeastern mn and northwestern wisconsin. the organization leads regional research efforts related to human resources, and emerging industries to inform business development and…

Community Improvement
7
Racine County Economic Development Corporation

To provide economic development services including business recruitment, expansion, business financing, community and workforce development.

Human Services
8
Grant Regional Health Center Inc

Together we are dedicated to improve the health and wellness of all generations through high quality, compassionate, and patient-centered care.

Health
9
Boone County Economic Development

To promote economic development in boone county.

Community Improvement
10
Sioux City Lewis & Clark Association
Arts & Culture
11
Wisconsin Economic Development Association Inc

The mission of wisconsin economic development association, inc. is to enhance economic development in wisconsin through professional development, networking, and advocacy.

—
12
Center for Healthcare Careers of Southeast Wisconsin Inc

The mission of the center for healthcare careers of southeast wisconsin, inc. (chcsew) is to unite all appropriate stakeholders in a viable, flexible structure to locate, educate and support a workforce from service to professional levels…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marshfield Clinic Health System Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Legion Post 73. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $243,550 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHIGHGROUND: $200,000 · OtherHIGHGROUNDAmerican Legion Post 73: $75,000 · OtherAmerican Legion Post 73CHRISTMAS ANGEL PROJECT: $63,000 · OtherCHRISTMAS ANGEL PROJECTNEILLSVILLE IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION INC: $60,000 · OtherNEILLSVILLE IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION INCHIGHGROUND VETERANS MEMORIAL PARK: $57,000 · OtherHIGHGROUND VETERANS MEMORIAL PARKNEILLSVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $35,000 · Other+47 more: $291,375 · Other+47 moreMARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $150,000 · HealthMARSHFIELD CLINIC …MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER INC: $50,000 · HealthMEMORIAL MEDICAL C…SPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC: $14,500 · Recreation & SportsST JOHNS EARLY LEARNING CENTER INC: $5,000 · EducationWORKFORCE RESOURCE INC: $2,500 · EmploymentFRIENDS OF THE BLACK RIVER INC: $2,500 · Environment
Other$1,024,925Health$200,000Recreation & Sports$14,500Education$5,000Employment$2,500Environment$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Legion Post 73: $75,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetNEILLSVILLE IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION INC: $60,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetMEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC: $14,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetST JOHNS EARLY LEARNING CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWORKFORCE RESOURCE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLARK COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds American Legion Post 73 ↗
  • Who funds NEILLSVILLE IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHNS EARLY LEARNING CENTER INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marguerite Listeman Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marguerite Listeman Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Marguerite Listeman Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Marguerite Listeman Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marguerite Listeman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph