Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marguerite Carl Smith Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$136k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$34k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$905kRecreation & Sports$31kFood & Nutrition$25kEmployment$12kHuman Services$12kMembership Benefit$5kYouth Development$4kEnvironment$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $63k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$33,750
PENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY$15,000
PASSHE COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY OF PENNSY$13,750
PENN STATE UNIVERSITY$7,500
CEDARVILLE UNIVERSITY$7,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY$5,000
MESSIAH UNIVERSITY$5,000
GROVE CITY COLLEGE$5,000
ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE$5,000
THE JERSEY SHORE PUBLIC LIBRARY$5,000
SLIPPERY ROCK UNIVERSITY$5,000
JERSEY SHORE SUMMER RECREATION$5,000
JAMES V BROWN LIBRARY$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NORTH CENTRAL SIGHT SERVICES: $4k → 12%North Central Sight Services: $3k → 12%Northcentral Sight Services: $3k → 12%Northcentral Sight Services: $3k → 12%NORTH CENTRAL SIGHT SERVICES: $2k → 12%NORTH CENTRAL SIGHT SERVICES: $2k → 12%North Central Sight Services: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$745k · 16 repeat orgs$273k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
7

Total granted

$745k
$255k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+706%

Still filing today

56%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JV
    JAMES V BROWN LIBRARY
    7× · 2018–2025 · $33k · revenue +10%
  • JS
    JERSEY SHORE PUBLIC LIBRARY
    7× · 2018–2025 · $31k · revenue +25%
  • JS
    JERSEY SHORE SUMMER RECREATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $28k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $120k
  • JS
    JERSEY SHORE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2023 · $119k
  • JS
    JERSEY SHORE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
2
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
3
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
4
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
5
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
6
Lebanon Valley College

Lebanon valley college educates students for lifelong success through exceptional undergraduate liberal-arts programs and professional graduate programs delivered in an engaging and supportive academic and co-curricular environment.…

Education
7
Geneva College

Geneva college is a christ-centered academic community that provides a comprehensive education to equip students for faithful and fruitful service to god and neighbor.

Education
8
Meredith College

Meredith college, grounded in the liberal arts and committed to professional preparation, educates and inspires students to live with integrity and provide leadership for the needs, opportunities and challenges of society.

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
Lincoln University

Lincoln university is a public, historically black university (hbcu) that provides a liberal arts based, undergraduate education on its main residential campus in chester county, pennsylvania; and professional programs on its urban campus…

Education
11
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
12
York College of Pennsylvania

York college prepares graduates for fulfilling, productive, and purposeful lives by providing high quality programs of study supported by relevant real-world experiences. continued on schedule o.as a rich and diverse community of educators…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lycoming College; the most unlike its peers is Elizabethtown College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Jersey Shore Area High School: $372,500 · OtherJersey Shore Area High SchoolIndividual grant recipient: $120,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJERSEY SHORE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $118,750 · OtherJERSEY SHORE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICTPASSHE COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY OF PENNSY: $51,250 · OtherPASSHE COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYCOMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $51,250 · OtherCOMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIAPENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY: $37,500 · OtherJAMES V BROWN LIBRARY: $33,000 · OtherJERSEY SHORE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $31,000 · Other+7 more: $64,000 · Other+7 moreMISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationGROVE CITY COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationCedarville University: $7,500 · EducationLYCOMING COLLEGE: $7,500 · EducationMESSIAH UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $5,000 · EducationJERSEY SHORE SUMMER RECREATION INC: $28,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE NEW LOVE CENTER: $25,000 · Food & NutritionNORTH CENTRAL SIGHT SERVICES INC: $18,000 · Human ServicesNORTHCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY: $2,650 · Environment
Other$879,250Education$65,000Recreation & Sports$28,000Food & Nutrition$25,000Human Services$18,000Environment$2,650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJAMES V BROWN LIBRARY: $33,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetJERSEY SHORE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $31,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetJERSEY SHORE SUMMER RECREATION INC: $28,000 over 6y, 14% of budgetTHE NEW LOVE CENTER: $25,000 over 6y, 5.8% of budgetMISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CENTRAL SIGHT SERVICES INC: $18,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGROVE CITY COLLEGE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCedarville University: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLYCOMING COLLEGE: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJERSEY SHORE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMESSIAH UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY: $2,650 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JAMES V BROWN LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds JERSEY SHORE PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds JERSEY SHORE SUMMER RECREATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW LOVE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CENTRAL SIGHT SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GROVE CITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Cedarville University ↗
  • Who funds LYCOMING COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds JERSEY SHORE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MESSIAH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds NORTHCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Community Foundation Partnership of PennsylvaniaPA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Community Foundation Partnership of Pennsylvania · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marguerite Carl Smith Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marguerite Carl Smith Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Marguerite Carl Smith Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Marguerite Carl Smith Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marguerite Carl Smith’s filings →

    More from the funding graph