Skip to content

· Private foundation

Margaret Walker Purinton Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$160k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$47k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$508kEducation$426kPhilanthropy$369kArts & Culture$19k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$30,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION$47,000
SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER$36,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTON FOUNDATION$30,000
LINCOLN SCHOOL$18,000
MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC$16,000
THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS$13,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $16k → 8%THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $15k → 16%SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $36k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $30k → 15%MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $16k → 8%THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $15k → 16%THE RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $34k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $30k → 15%MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $15k → 8%THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $15k → 16%THE RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION: $47k → 14%SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $30k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $30k → 15%MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $15k → 8%THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $13k → 16%THE RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION: $45k → 14%SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $30k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $28k → 15%MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $15k → 8%THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $13k → 16%THE RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION: $45k → 14%SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $30k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $28k → 15%MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $12k → 8%THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $12k → 16%THE RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION: $40k → 14%SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $24k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $28k → 15%THE RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION: $40k → 14%SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $24k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $24k → 15%THE RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION: $27k → 14%SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $20k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $24k → 15%THE RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $18k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $22k → 15%THE RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%LINCOLN SCHOOL: $21k → 14%LINCOLN SCHOOL: $21k → 14%LINCOLN SCHOOL: $20k → 14%LINCOLN SCHOOL: $18k → 14%LINCOLN SCHOOL: $18k → 14%LINCOLN SCHOOL: $18k → 14%LINCOLN SCHOOL: $17k → 14%LINCOLN SCHOOL: $17k → 14%LINCOLN SCHOOL: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 23% of Margaret Walker Purinton Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Margaret Walker Purinton Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$933k · 8 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$933k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+54%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $246k · revenue +55%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $244k · revenue +38%
  • MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $119k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • TN
    THE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF VIRGINIA
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • SHEILA C SKIP NOWELL LEADERSHIP ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +54%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
3
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
4
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
5
Wildlands Trust Inc

The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…

Environment
6
Washington Forest Law Center

Dedicated to protecting the world's natural environment on behalf of the public by serving as a public interest law firm. refer to schedule o, part iii, line 4a, for list of litigated cases or advocacy work.

—
7
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
8
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
9
The Land Trust for Tennessee Inc

To conserve the unique character of tennessee's natural and historic landscapes and sites for future generations.

Environment
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
National Caucus of Environmental Legislators

The national caucus of environmental legislators empowers a nonpartisan network of legislative champions to protect, conserve, and improve the natural and human environment.

Education
12
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Trust for Public Land; the most unlike its peers is Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $246,000 · OtherSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTERLINCOLN SCHOOL: $165,000 · OtherLINCOLN SCHOOL+2 more: $14,000 · OtherTHE RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $369,000 · PhilanthropyTHE RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUN…UNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $244,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARY WAS…SOPHIA ACADEMY: $11,000 · Education+1 more: $6,000 · EducationMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $119,000 · EnvironmentMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON…THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $108,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUSTEES OF RESER…THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $21,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC …THOMAS JEFFERSON FOUNDATION INC: $19,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$425,000Philanthropy$369,000Education$261,000Environment$248,000Arts & Culture$19,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $369,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $246,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $244,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetLINCOLN SCHOOL: $165,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $119,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $108,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON FOUNDATION INC: $19,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOPHIA ACADEMY: $11,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHEILA C SKIP NOWELL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOPHIA ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds SHEILA C SKIP NOWELL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Margaret Walker Purinton Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Margaret Walker Purinton Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Margaret Walker Purinton Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Margaret Walker Purinton Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Margaret Walker Purinton’s filings →

More from the funding graph