Skip to content

· Private foundation

Margaret Beelard Community Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$110k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$309kArts & Culture$199kEducation$94kAnimals$90kHealth$46kScience & Tech$39kCrime & Legal$24kHousing & Shelter$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 96% of reported assets are held in Exchange Bank.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$20,000
Big Brothers Big Sisters North Bay$10,000
Canine Companions For Independence$10,000
Young Artists Conservatory of Music$8,000
Victimes Empowerment Support Team$7,560
Gaslighters Theatrical Company$7,500
JR Achievement of Northern Californ$6,000
Joyful Art Center$5,000
Voena$5,000
Vallejo Center for the Arts$5,000
HomeMore Project$5,000
Saving Gracie$5,000
Cresent Moon Center$5,000
Safe Quest Solano$2,500
Buckingham Charter Magnet High Scho$2,025
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $104k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Canine Companions For Independence: $10k → 9%Canine Companions For Independence: $10k → 9%Canine Companions For Independence: $10k → 9%Canine Companions For Independence: $10k → 9%Canine Companions For Independence: $10k → 9%Canine Companions For Independence: $10k → 9%Canine Companions For Independence: $10k → 9%Canine Companions For Independence: $5k → 9%Canine Companions For Independence: $5k → 9%Victimes Empowerment Support Team: $9k → 10%Victimes Empowerment Support Team: $8k → 10%Victimes Empowerment Support Team: $4k → 10%Victimes Empowerment Support Team: $4k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$783k · 24 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
6

Total granted

$783k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
-1%

Still filing today

42%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TV
    THE VACAVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
    7× · 2017–2024 · $85k · revenue +195%
  • CC
    CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +76%
  • YA
    YOUNG ARTISTS CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $78k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • SL
    SOLANO LAND TRUST
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -58%
  • SL
    Sylvan Legacy Chamber Choir
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • VS
    VALLEJO SYMPHONY ASSOCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +71%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sonoma Botanical Garden
—
2
San Bernardino Valley Concert Association
—
3
Occidental Center for the Arts

Occidental Center for the Arts exists to provide a welcoming and accessible venue for the performing and visual arts in Sonoma County California for local regional national and international artists. our mission is to enrich our community…

Arts & Culture
4
The California Theatre of Santa Rosa

To champion the performing arts in Santa Rosa for all. To connect people with one another and with art that can enrich their lives. To embrace people from all backgrounds. To provide exceptional service to our resident companies and to…

Arts & Culture
5
Value Culture

To produce and support artistic, educational, charitable,and spiritual events to inspire individuals to give back to their communities.

—
6
San Jose Chamber Orchestra

The mission of the San Jose Chamber Orchestra (SJCO) is to share exciting, though-provoking, and vibrant Music by contemporary and time-honored composers reflecting the cultural diversity of our everchanging community, and to support and…

Unclassified
7
San Lorenzo Valley Mountain Community Theater
Arts & Culture
8
Encanto Arts
Arts & Culture
9
Winchester Orchestra of San Jose

The mission of the Winchester Orchestra is to experience and share the joy of playing orchestral music with the people of San Jose in a friendly and enjoyable concert atmosphere.

Arts & Culture
10
Voices of Silicon Valley

Community Music / Arts Organization

Arts & Culture
11
San Francisco Guzheng Music Society
Arts & Culture
12
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canine Companions for Independence Inc; the most unlike its peers is Joyful Art Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $140,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBig Brothers Big Sisters North Bay: $60,000 · OtherBig Brothers Big Sisters North BayJR Achievement of Northern Californ: $42,000 · OtherJR Achievement of Northern CalifornMarks Growing Center Inc Mustard Seed: $41,400 · OtherMarks Growing Center Inc Mustard SeedVacavilles Imagine That: $38,980 · OtherVacavilles Imagine ThatBuckingham Charter Magnet High Scho: $16,172 · Other+17 more: $114,003 · Other+17 moreYOUNG ARTISTS CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $78,000 · Arts & CultureYOUNG ARTISTS CONSER…GASLIGHTERS THEATRICAL COMPANY: $55,000 · Arts & CultureGASLIGHTERS THEATRIC…VOENA: $15,000 · Arts & CultureVOENA+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANION…Victims Empowerment Support Team VEST: $24,310 · Human ServicesVictims Empowerm…HOMEMORE PROJECT INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesHOMEMORE PROJECT…THE VACAVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $85,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE VACAVIL…SOLANO LAND TRUST: $10,000 · Food & NutritionSAVING GRACIE INC: $10,000 · AnimalsSOLANO COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$452,555Arts & Culture$153,000Human Services$119,310Youth Development$85,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Animals$10,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE VACAVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $85,000 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $80,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG ARTISTS CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $78,000 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetGASLIGHTERS THEATRICAL COMPANY: $55,000 over 8y, 73% of budgetMarks Growing Center Inc Mustard Seed: $41,400 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetVacavilles Imagine That: $38,980 over 3y, 14% of budgetVictims Empowerment Support Team VEST: $24,310 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetVOENA: $15,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetHOMEMORE PROJECT INC: $15,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetSOLANO LAND TRUST: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVALLEJO SYMPHONY ASSOC: $10,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetSAVING GRACIE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetSafeQuest Solano Inc: $6,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSOLANO COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetCRESCENT MOON CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetEssentially Everly Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE VACAVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG ARTISTS CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds GASLIGHTERS THEATRICAL COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds Marks Growing Center Inc Mustard Seed ↗
  • Who funds Vacavilles Imagine That ↗
  • Who funds Victims Empowerment Support Team VEST ↗
  • Who funds VOENA ↗
  • Who funds HOMEMORE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SOLANO LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds VALLEJO SYMPHONY ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds SAVING GRACIE INC ↗
  • Who funds SafeQuest Solano Inc ↗
  • Who funds JOYFUL ART CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SOLANO COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CRESCENT MOON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Essentially Everly Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Syar Foundation Susan L Syar DirectorCA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Syar Foundation Susan L Syar Director · The San Francisco Foundation · Solano Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Margaret Beelard Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Margaret Beelard Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Margaret Beelard Community Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Margaret Beelard Community Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Margaret Beelard’s filings →

    More from the funding graph