· Private foundation
Marett Philip Cotrs Uw
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CITY OF NEW HAVEN - ELDERLY SERVICES | $32,029 |
| JUNTA FOR PROGRESSIVE ACTION | $30,000 |
| MARY WADE HOME | $25,000 |
| FAIR HAVEN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC | $10,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- COCITY OF NEW HAVEN6× · 2019–2024 · $359k
- LCLIFEBRIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC3× · 2022–2024 · $93k · revenue +8%
- TMTHE MARY WADE HOME INCORPORATED3× · 2023–2025 · $91k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF BRIDGEPORTone grant, 2022 · $32k
- LWLIVING WORD MINISTRIES INCone grant, 2023 · $13k
UNITED WAY OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +47%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Marett Philip Cotrs Uw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marett Philip Cotrs Uw. Bigger dots raise more.
- United Way of Greater New Haven Inc: 42% of income from government
- Junta for Progressive Action Inc: 35% of income from government
- Lifebridge Community Services Inc: 32% of income from government
- The Mary Wade Home Incorporated: 2% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Marett Philip Cotrs Uw’s filings →