Loading…
· Public charity
MARC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC
Copa health is a nonprofit organization that provides exceptional healthcare services, guided by its six core values: people first, compassion, integrity, perseverance, accountability, and innovation.
$21k
Granted FY2024
1
Grants
1
Communities
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0175% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2024.
Health$66kEducation$23kCrime & Legal$10kYouth Development$10kHuman Services$7kRecreation & Sports$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$43k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
—
2020
—
2021
youth
2022
athleticlegacy cares
2023
educationgreat heartsclassicalstudents
2024
educationgreat heartsclassicalstudents
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 1 grant
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
- GREAT HEARTS AMERICA$10,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Legacy Health Foundation
Legacy Health Foundation's mission is to foster charitable giving as well as community commitment and involvement to support the founding principles, mission and vision of legacy health and promote the health and well-being of the…
Health
2
Greathearts Arizona
Great hearts is a non-profit network of public charter schools dedicated to improving education nationwide through classical preparatory k-12 academies. a great hearts education prepares students to be more than just proficient test…
Education
3
HealthImpact
To shape health care through workforce strategy, stakeholder convening, and policy advocacy.
Health
4
Trust for Americas Health
Trust for Americas Health promotes optimal health for every person and community and makes the prevention of illness and injury a national priority.
Education
5
Americas Physician Groups
Americas Physician Groups (APG) is a national association representing more than 335 physician groups with approximately 170,000 physicians providing care to nearly 90 million patients. APGs tagline, Taking Responsibility for Americas…
Community Improvement
6
Arizona Hospital and Healthcare
Advancing charitable & educational goals of az hospital & healthcare trade association.
Health
7
Executives for Health Innovation Ehi
Executives for health innovation (ehi) is a catalyst for healthcare transformation, convening diverse leaders from across the industryto unlock opportunities for collaborative innovation. ehi focuses on education, shaping policy, and…
—
8
Marana Health Center Inc
Improving our community by providing exceptional, whole-person healthcare.
Health
9
Empower Through Health
Empower Through Health is dedicated to improving public health and advancing health equity in underserved communities. We achieve this by supporting healthcare services conducting research to develop effective health interventions and…
Health
10
Great Hearts America-Texas
To educate and graduate thoughtful leaders of character who contribute to society.
Environment
11
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc
Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…
Membership Benefit
12
Physicians for a Healthy California
Physicians for a Healthy California is dedicated to improving community health, growing a diverse physician workforce and promoting health equity. Our programs continue to improve public health, provide clinical practice support and…
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Copa Health Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$65,850Other$42,904Education$23,125Crime & Legal$10,000Youth Development$10,000Human Services$7,000Recreation & Sports$5,150Public Safety & Disaster$5,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds GREAT HEARTS AMERICA ↗
- Who funds New Pathways for Youth Inc ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Ctrl AZ ↗
- Who funds CRISIS RESPONSE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds Fresh Start Women's Foundation ↗
- Who funds Legacy Cares Inc ↗
- Who funds Equality Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds Teen Lifeline Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Arizona Community FoundationAZ17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation MARC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Boys & Girls Clubs of Ctrl AZ.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 860964489 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Boys & Girls Clubs of Ctrl AZ, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Marc Community Resources Inc?
Find your warmest path to Marc Community Resources Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines