Skip to content
Marc and Sharon Hagle Charitable Operating Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Marc and Sharon Hagle Charitable Operating Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$965k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$560k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$11MRecreation & Sports$3.2MHealth$310kArts & Culture$156kScience & Tech$130kPhilanthropy$50kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+2 grants · $810k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS$560,000
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$250,000
ADVENTHEALTH FOUNDATION$100,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE DR PHILLIPS CENTER FOR THE: $100k → 13%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $4.0M → 19%NEMOURS FUND FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $100k → 13%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $4.0M → 19%NEMOURS FUND FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $50k → 13%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $2.0M → 19%NEMOURS FUND FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $50k → 13%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $250k → 19%NEMOURS FUND FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $50k → 13%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $250k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $1.0M → 13%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $51k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $1.0M → 13%PURDUE ASTRONAUT: $15k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $560k → 13%PURDUE ASTRONAUT: $15k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $250k → 13%PURDUE ASTRONAUT: $10k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $50k → 13%PURDUE ASTRONAUT: $10k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $25k → 13%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $25k → 13%PURDUE ASTRONAUT: $10k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $25k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $25k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $25k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $20k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $20k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $10k → 13%THE ORLANDO SCIENCE CENTER: $100k → 13%ADVENTHEALTH FOUNDATION: $100k → 13%ORLANDO BALLET: $50k → 13%CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $50k → 13%ORLANDO BALLET INC: $17k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15M · 30 repeat orgs$438k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
79

Total granted

$15M
$413k

Still filing today

13%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    ORLANDO SCIENCE CENTERINC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $130k · revenue +91%
  • AF
    AdventHealth Foundation Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $110k · revenue +65%
  • OB
    ORLANDO BALLET INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $76k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • TD
    THE DR PHILLIPS CENTER FOR THE
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 115 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $10,561,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS: $3,165,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FL ATHLETICS+109 more: $1,014,989 · Other+109 moreORLANDO SCIENCE CENTERINC: $130,000 · Arts & CultureORLANDO BALLET INC: $75,511 · Arts & CultureAdventHealth Foundation Inc: $110,000 · HealthCENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Philanthropy
Other$14,740,989Arts & Culture$205,511Health$110,000Philanthropy$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetORLANDO SCIENCE CENTERINC: $130,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetAdventHealth Foundation Inc: $110,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetONEPULSE FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetORLANDO BALLET INC: $75,511 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ORLANDO SCIENCE CENTERINC ↗
  • Who funds AdventHealth Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ONEPULSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ORLANDO BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marc and Sharon Hagle Charitable Operating Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marc and Sharon Hagle Charitable Operating Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Orlando Science Centerinc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 115 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Marc and Sharon Hagle Charitable Operating’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home