Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marc and Janet Pfeffer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$142kEducation$54kPhilanthropy$11kReligion$11kCivil Rights$9kInternational$3kPublic Benefit$750Arts & Culture$145
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$344k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM$15,000
Individual grant recipient$4,640
AJC GLOBAL JEWISH ADVOCACY$2,500
UJA FEDERATION NEW YORK$1,500
FIDF- FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE$1,500
PARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE$1,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING$500
Individual grant recipient$500
GIVE WELL$500
CROHN'S COLITIS FOUNDATION$500
THE HESCHEL SCHOOL$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $113k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $20k → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $17k → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $16k → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $15k → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $15k → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $15k → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$199k · 16 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
14

Total granted

$199k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+9%

Still filing today

56%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyInternationalHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $113k · revenue +34%
  • Cornell University
    3× · 2017–2020 · $18k · revenue +59%
  • RC
    RIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $17k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • IS
    ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MT SINA
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • MS
    MOUNT SINAI
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • AM
    Active Minds Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue -10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
2
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
3
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
4
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Ben and Esther Rosenbloom Hillel Center for Jewish Life At University of Md

Enhance the lives of jewish students as that they may enrich the jewish people and the world. hillel actively seeks to engage jewish students on their own terms, to provide them with opportunities to participate in jewish life.

—
7
Hillel At the George Washington University Inc

The mission of gw hillel is to provide an open, warm, and pluralistic environment in which students can shape their college experience by connecting socially, culturally, and spiritually to their judaism. hillel aims to foster students'…

—
8
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Brown Hillel Foundation

Brown risd hillel encourages and supports a diversity of students as they explore, develop and deepen their jewish identities. we are committed to having judaism serve as a source of meaning and growth during their time on college hill and…

—
11
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
12
Hillel Foundation of Cambridge Inc
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Metropolis Cc Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $112,500 · Human ServicesMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INCICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MT SINA: $15,000 · OtherICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT …MOUNT SINAI: $10,000 · OtherMOUNT SINAIAJC GLOBAL JEWISH ADVOCACY: $8,500 · OtherAJC GLOBAL JEWISH ADVOCACYPARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE INC: $7,750 · OtherPARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE INCIndividual grant recipient: $5,140 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE HESCHEL SCHOOL: $2,500 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $2,250 · Other+12 more: $7,415 · Other+12 moreCornell University: $17,500 · EducationCornell UniversityRIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC: $17,250 · EducationRIVERDALE COUNTRY S…SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE: $4,000 · EducationSARAH LAWRENCE COLL…+1 more: $360 · EducationUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $11,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CLEAR FUND: $1,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $250 · PhilanthropySCHOOL YEAR ABROAD INC: $6,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $500 · InternationalActive Minds Inc: $500 · HealthTHE JED FOUNDATION: $500 · HealthTHE MIRYAM INSTITUTE INC: $750 · Public Benefit
Human Services$112,500Other$58,555Education$39,110Philanthropy$12,250International$6,500Health$1,000Public Benefit$750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $112,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC: $17,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOL YEAR ABROAD INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRutgers Hillel Corporation: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIRYAM INSTITUTE INC: $750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetActive Minds Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORNELL HILLEL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe President and Trustees of Colby College: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $145 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds RIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL YEAR ABROAD INC ↗
  • Who funds SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Rutgers Hillel Corporation ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEAR FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE MIRYAM INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Active Minds Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds THE JED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CORNELL HILLEL ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds The President and Trustees of Colby College ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLIS CC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston IncMA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marc and Janet Pfeffer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marc and Janet Pfeffer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marc and Janet Pfeffer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph