Skip to content

· Private foundation

Manowitz and Drillings Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$123k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$677kFood & Nutrition$119kInternational$80kEnvironment$55kCrime & Legal$35kCivil Rights$27kArts & Culture$26kHuman Services$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
American Heart Association$25,000
Memorial Sloan Kettering Hospital$10,000
Prostate Cancer Foundation$10,000
Doctors without borders USA$7,500
City Meals on Wheels$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
St Jude Childrens Research Hospital$5,000
Planned Parenthood Federation$5,000
Research to Prevent Blindness$5,000
Smile Train$5,000
Natural Resource Defense Council$5,000
Cure ALzheimers Fund$5,000
Fischer Center for Alzheimer's Rese$5,000
Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun$5,000
Bob Woodruff Foundation$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%The Innocence Project: $5k → 17%The Innocence Project: $5k → 17%The Innocence Project: $5k → 17%The Innocence Project: $3k → 17%The Innocence Project: $3k → 17%The Innocence Project: $3k → 17%The Innocence Project: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
CT
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 40 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
3

Total granted

$1.0M
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+9%

Still filing today

63%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalFood & NutritionArts & CultureCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $223k · revenue +33%
  • PC
    PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $64k · revenue +57%
  • Feeding America
    5× · 2019–2023 · $55k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • FT
    FEED THE CHILDREN INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -35%
  • BW
    Bob Woodruff Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • DA
    DIABETES ACTION RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
3
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

The lustgarten foundation is the largest private funder of pancreatic cancer research in the world. see schedule o.the lustgarten foundation is boldly leading the way through hope and innovation, turning fear into action through education…

Human Services
6
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
7
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
8
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
9
American Institute for Cancer Research

Aicr champions the latest and most authoritative scientific research from around the world on cancer prevention and survival through diet, weight and physical activity, so that we can help people make informed lifestyle choices to reduce…

Health
10
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
11
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
12
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed the Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fight for Sight Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
23/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

American Heart Association Inc: $223,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $54,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATIONMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $53,000 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTERST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $48,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $47,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INCThe Fistula Foundation: $26,000 · HealthBOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · HealthRESEARCH TO PREVENT BLINDNESS INC: $17,500 · Health+2 more: $9,500 · HealthSMILE TRAIN INC: $34,000 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INCRemote Area Medical Foundation: $31,000 · OtherRemote Area Medical Founda…Fischer Center for Alzheimer's Rese: $30,000 · OtherFischer Center for Alzheim…Natural Resource Defense Council: $25,000 · OtherNatural Resource Defense C…Memorial Sloan Kettering Hospital: $20,000 · OtherMemorial Sloan Kettering H…ThirteenWNET: $15,000 · OtherThirteenWNETTHE RACHEL COOPER FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · OtherGiffords Law Center to Prevent Gun: $10,000 · OtherNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER: $10,000 · OtherWNET: $11,200 · Other+15 more: $53,600 · Other+15 moreFeeding America: $55,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding Ame…CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $42,500 · Food & NutritionCITYMEALS-O…CITY HARVEST INC: $11,250 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVES…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $53,500 · InternationalMEDECINS …International Rescue Committee INC: $20,000 · InternationalInternati…FEED THE CHILDREN INC: $10,000 · InternationalFEED THE …+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $64,000 · PhilanthropyNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $30,000 · EnvironmentTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $25,000 · Human Services
Health$498,500Other$251,800Food & Nutrition$108,750International$84,500Philanthropy$64,000Environment$30,000Human Services$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $223,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $64,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $55,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $54,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $53,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $53,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $48,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $47,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $42,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $34,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation: $26,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $25,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRESEARCH TO PREVENT BLINDNESS INC: $17,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RACHEL COOPER FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $11,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWNET: $11,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MACULA FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetGIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDIABETES ACTION RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFight for Sight Inc: $2,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds The Fistula Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds BOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds RESEARCH TO PREVENT BLINDNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RACHEL COOPER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds WNET ↗
  • Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE MACULA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DIABETES ACTION RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Fight for Sight Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Manowitz and Drillings Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Manowitz and Drillings Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Manowitz and Drillings Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph