· Public charity
Mandan Baseball Club Inc
To operate baseball program for the benefit of youth and their families so they may enjoy growth through recreational and competitive baseball.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 14 grants below total $4,060,553 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,158,059 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $97,506 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $107k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
- $250k+1 grant · $3.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Mandan Park District | $3,821,873 |
| Saint Joseph Church School | $100,000 |
| MPS Foundation | $30,000 |
| Mandan Touchdown Club | $22,180 |
| Mandan Tennis Center | $15,000 |
| ND Safety Council | $10,000 |
| USA Patriots Veteran Athletics | $10,000 |
| CHI Health at Home | $10,000 |
| United Tribes Technical College | $10,000 |
| Bismarck Mandan Chamber | $9,000 |
| Mandan Firefighters Association | $6,500 |
| Brave the Shave | $6,000 |
| Larks Community Fund | $5,000 |
| Operations Cigars for Warriors | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MPMandan Park District2× · 2023–2024 · $4.6M
- COCHURCH OF ST JOSEPH MANDAN TRUSTEE INC2× · 2023–2024 · $175k
- MPMANDAN PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION2× · 2023–2024 · $35k · revenue -9%
Funded once
- MNMANDAN ND LEWIS AND CLARK PTOone grant, 2023 · $13k
- DEDISTRIBUTIVE EDUCATION CLUBS OF AMERICA INC GROUP RETURNgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +42%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Fargo Post 2 Baseball Club has been established to give players an opportunity to play the game of baseball. Giving 45 plus young men a chance to play competitive baseball in Fargo, ND.
Advancing tribal colleges through collaboration and shared goals. ndtcs leverages the higher education experience by sharing ideas and broadening networks and alliances, toward improving students' outcomes.
Veterans organization to foster camaraderie among united states veterans of overseas conflicts; to serve our veterans, the military, and our communities; to advocate on behalf of all veterans.
To operate baseball program for the benefit of youth and their families so they may enjoy growth through recreational and competitive baseball.
To improve and protect the public health of all north dakotans by reducing the serious health and economic consequesnces of tobacco use, the state's number one cause of preventable disease and death.
The purpose of the corporation is to: 1) conduct research and education on topics related to north dakota's economic growth; 2) engage in activities that promote civic engagement; and 3) conduct programs that support workforce solutions.
To Support the Sport of Softball
The nd stockmen's association is a cattle producers' trade organization. it provides member services & activities, conducts the state's brand programs, & provides legislative watchdog activities. its mission is to unite, protect, promote,…
The north dakota petroleum council's mission is to promote and enhance the discovery, development, production, transportation, refining, conservation, and marketing of oil and gas in north dakota, south dakota, and the rocky mountain…
Info & advocacy for rural health in nd
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bismarck-Mandan Chamber Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Brave the Shave. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MANDAN PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds MANDAN TOUCHDOWN CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds BISMARCK-MANDAN CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds USA PATRIOTS VETERAN ATHLETICS ↗
- Who funds NORTH DAKOTA SAFETY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds CHI HEALTH CONNECT AT HOME - FARGO ↗
- Who funds UNITED TRIBES TECHNICAL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds BRAVE THE SHAVE ↗
- Who funds DISTRIBUTIVE EDUCATION CLUBS OF AMERICA INC GROUP RETURN ↗
- Who funds LARKS COMMUNITY FUND ↗
- Who funds OPERATION CIGARS FOR WARRIORS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sanford Group Return · North Dakota Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mandan Baseball Club Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Mandan Baseball Club Inc?
Find your warmest path to Mandan Baseball Club Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.