Skip to content
Malzahn Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Malzahn Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc

Support the oklahoma city community foundation by enriching the community of perry, ok.

$4.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2.2M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$7.9MRecreation & Sports$6.5MHuman Services$1.1MArts & Culture$1.0MPublic Benefit$966kFood & Nutrition$400kPhilanthropy$132kHealth$86kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $4,130,471, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,312,479 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $182,008 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $288k
  • $250k+3 grants · $3.8M
$626,202
Median grant
1
States reached
$143M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PERRY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$2,157,000
CITY OF PERRYPERRY FACILITIES AUTHORITY$1,049,000
MAIN STREET OF PERRY$626,202
NOBLE COUNTY FAMILY YMCA$220,484
CHEROKEE STRIP HISTORICAL SOCIETY$67,785
UNITED FUND OF PERRY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $10k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $9k → 16%Noble County Family YMCA: $385k → 12%NOBLE COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $220k → 12%NOBLE COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $186k → 12%NOBLE COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $163k → 12%Noble County Family YMCA: $135k → 12%Noble County Family YMCA: $132k → 12%NOBLE COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $126k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17M · 9 repeat orgs$585k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

$17M
$585k

Still filing today

78%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NOBLE COUNTY YMCA
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +243% · 63% of their budget
  • MS
    Main Street of Perry Inc
    4× · 2019–2025 · $932k · revenue ×12 · 90% of their budget
  • CS
    CHEROKEE STRIP HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    4× · 2021–2025 · $94k · revenue +20% · 28% of their budget

Funded once

  • PF
    PERRY FOOD PANTRY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $400k
  • NC
    NOBLE COUNTY FAIR BOARD
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • MP
    Morrison Public Schools
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
2
Masonic Charity Foundation of Oklahoma
Health
3
Neosho Memorial Hospital Foundation
—
4
Perry County Memorial Hospital Foun

Hospital funding

Health
5
Oklahoma Scholarship Fund Inc
—
6
Will Rogers Memorial Foundation

Support Will Rogers Memorial Museums

Philanthropy
7
Okla Co Med Soc-Community Foundation

Promote Better Health in Oklahoma

—
8
Pi Beta Phi Foundation of Okc
Philanthropy
9
Pryor Area Foundation

Promote Mayes County to the World

Education
10
Cushing Regional Hospital Foundation

The purpose is to secure and expand financial aid for capital improvements, expansion of health care facilities and services and contribute to the health care maintenance of the poeple of cushing, oklahoma and the surrounding region.

Health
11
Oklahoma Heart Research and Education Foundation Inc
Health
12
Perkins Community Foundation

Organized for the purpose of charitable, religious, educational, and scientific purposes to enhance quality of life in the perkins, ok community.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The United Fund of Perry Oklahoma Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Noble County Medical Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PERRY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $7,872,612 · OtherPERRY PUBLIC SCHOOLSCITY OF PERRYPERRY FACILITIES AUTHORITY: $7,014,676 · OtherCITY OF PERRYPERRY FACILITIES AUTHORITY+11 more: $885,397 · Other+11 moreNOBLE COUNTY YMCA: $1,348,283 · Human Services+1 more: $18,500 · Human ServicesMain Street of Perry Inc: $932,202 · Community ImprovementTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $132,000 · Philanthropy
Other$15,772,685Human Services$1,366,783Community Improvement$932,202Philanthropy$132,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNOBLE COUNTY YMCA: $1,348,283 over 7y, 63% of budgetMain Street of Perry Inc: $932,202 over 4y, 90% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $132,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA LIONS SERVICE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetCHEROKEE STRIP HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $93,848 over 4y, 28% of budgetTHE UNITED FUND OF PERRY OKLAHOMA INCORPORATED: $70,000 over 7y, 9.8% of budgetNoble County Medical Foundation: $36,180 over 3y, 59% of budgetINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $18,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NOBLE COUNTY YMCA ↗
  • Who funds Main Street of Perry Inc ↗
  • Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA LIONS SERVICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHEROKEE STRIP HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE UNITED FUND OF PERRY OKLAHOMA INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Noble County Medical Foundation ↗
  • Who funds INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Malzahn Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Malzahn Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Malzahn Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc?

Find your warmest path to Malzahn Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Malzahn Family Affiliated Fund of Occf’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home