· Private foundation
Malbis Memorial Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k22 grants · $49k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $42k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ANNUNCIATION GREEK CHURCH OF MOBILE | $18,900 |
| GREEK ORTHODOX METROPOLIS OF ATLANT | $12,500 |
| HOLY CROSS SS CON HELEN GR ORTH CHU | $11,000 |
| IOCC INTL ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARIT | $8,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTH ALABAM | $5,000 |
| OCMC-ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN MISSION CTR | $3,500 |
| GREEK ORTHODOX ARCHDIOCESE OF AMERI | $3,000 |
| PILOTS FOR CHRIST | $3,000 |
| THE MONTGOMERY CIVIC BALLET | $3,000 |
| WATER FRONT RESCUE MISSION | $3,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY OF COASTAL ALABAMA | $3,000 |
| ST PAULS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| LADIES PHILOPTOCHOS SOCIETY OF MOBI | $1,850 |
| UNDER HIS WINGS | $1,850 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
61 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 47 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PHPENELOPE HOUSE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $29k · revenue +26%
- UHUnder His Wings Inc8× · 2017–2025 · $26k · revenue +115%
- MMMAGIC MOMENTS3× · 2017–2019 · $23k · revenue +94%
Funded once
- SHSAINT HARALAMBOS GREEK ORTH CHURCHone grant, 2017 · $12k
- HCHOLY CROSS SS CON HELEN GR ORTH Cone grant, 2024 · $10k
- PSPHILOPTOCHOS SOCIEY OF ATLANTAone grant, 2021 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Motivated by the love and compassion of christ and in keeping with our baptist heritage, bchs provides quality primary healthcare and behavioral healthcare to individuals in medically underserved communities.
Habitat for humanity of baldwin county, inc. is an ecumenical, christian housing ministry that seeks to eliminate poverty housing by partnering with the community to make decent shelter a matter of conscience and action.
The alabama public health association, inc., is an association of individuals and organizations interested in public health in alabama. the mission of the association is to link individuals and organizations in addressing public health…
The mission of Children's of Alabama is to provide the finest pediatric health services to all children in an environment that fosters excellence in research and medical education. Children's will be an advocate for all children and work…
The Organization was formed to build, own and operate a Ronald McDonald House in Mobile, Alabama. The facility provides overnight lodging for children and their parents who travel long distances to Mobile area hospitals for various…
Hospice ministries, inc. provides social welfare, health and charitable hospice services and support to all persons throughout mississippi.
Provide free medical services for uninsured residents of shelby county, alabama.
The organization pledges to provide quality programs, service, and technology to meet the unique physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of the terminally ill and their families, and to educate the community about end of life issues.
Provide free medical services to uninsured individuals.
To provide healthcare to uninsured individuals.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thomas Hospital Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Shriners International El Zaribah Shriners. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 16% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 111 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREEKFEST CHARITY GALA INC ↗
- Who funds PENELOPE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Under His Wings Inc ↗
- Who funds MAGIC MOMENTS ↗
- Who funds THOMAS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALABAMA FREE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds Marys Shelter ↗
- Who funds UMS-WRIGHT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF BALDWIN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds AHEPA Hippocratic Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Prodisee Pantry Inc ↗
- Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baldwin County Electric Membership Charitable Foundation Inc · Snook Foundation · Crampton Trust #1255000731 Regions Bank Trustee · Cd Helen and Jeff Glaze Foundation · J L Bedsole Foundation Regions Bank Co-Trustee · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Mapp Family Foundation · Rc Craft Family Foundation · Impact 100 Baldwin County · Hearin - Chandler Foundation · Lillian C McGowin Foundation · H G Clay Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Malbis Memorial Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.