Skip to content

· Private foundation

Make It Possible Foundation Inc

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2017
10
Grants FY2017
6
States reached
$3k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

85% of Make It Possible Foundation Inc’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Bank Of America Charitable Gift Fd, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2017, the last year Make It Possible Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $11k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’17
3
’18
4
’19
3
’20
4
’21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Education$63kPhilanthropy$48kYouth Development$16kArts & Culture$12kHealth$9kInternational$6kHuman Services$3kCivil Rights$2kOther$0
02FY2017 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MULTIMEDIA ARTS AND DESIGN ACADEMY$3,000
THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION$3,000
SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
BISHOP GARCIA DIEGO HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF$250
JUNIOR GOLF ASSOCIATION OF ARIZONA INC$100
AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC$100
NOONTIME OPTIMISTS CLUB OF CAMARILLO$100
HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JF KAPNEK CHARITABLE TRUST: $1k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $500 → 9%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $100 → 11%HOPE SUPPLY: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
NY
RI
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$66k · 4 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +578% since the first grant, against +54% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2017, 2 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2017 (too recent to call). Read against FY2017, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
26

Total granted

$66k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+578%
+54%

Still filing today

50%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHealthInternationalPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    HORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $57k · revenue -12%
  • MA
    MULTIMEDIA ARTS AND DESIGN ACADEMY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k
  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
    2× · 2017–2019 · $4k · revenue +578%

Funded once

  • UD
    UNICEF - DALLAS
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • BF
    BELLOSGUARDO FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -98%
  • UU
    UNICEF USA - DALLAS
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
2
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
3
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
4
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
5
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
8
The Ku Endowment Charitable Gift Fund

To strengthen the University and communities that have touched the lives of KU alumni and friends, the mission of The KU Endowment Charitable Gift Fund is to receive and administer gifts and bequests to further the charitable objectives of…

Philanthropy
9
University of Arizona Foundation

The university of arizona foundation is committed to supporting and enhancing the vision, mission and values of the university of arizona through the development and management of private support.

Education
10
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
11
University of South Florida Foundation Inc

University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…

Education
12
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of the Valley; the most unlike its peers is African Wildlife Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC: $56,863 · EducationHORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERI…Southern Methodist University: $2,500 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD: $48,072 · PhilanthropyBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FDBELLOSGUARDO FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyBELLOSGUARDO FOUNDATION INCTexas Cultural Trust Council: $2,500 · PhilanthropyUNICEF - DALLAS: $10,000 · OtherUNICEF - DALLASUNICEF USA - DALLAS: $5,000 · OtherUNICEF USA - DALLA…MULTIMEDIA ARTS AND DESIGN ACADEMY: $4,000 · OtherMULTIMEDIA ARTS AN…ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE - DALLAS: $1,500 · OtherANTI-DEFAMATION LE…GLOBAL LEADERSHIP CONNECTION CONFERENCE: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherBISHOP GARCIA DIEGO HIGH SCHOOL INC: $1,000 · OtherHOPE SUPPLY COMPANY - DALLAS: $1,000 · Other+8 more: $1,850 · Other+8 moreChildren's Cancer Fund of Dallas inc: $5,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $4,000 · HealthUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $5,000 · InternationalLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $250 · InternationalHOPE SUPPLY CO: $2,500 · Human ServicesTHE JF KAPNEK CHARITABLE TRUST: $1,000 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $500 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $1,500 · Environment
Education$59,463Philanthropy$55,572Other$26,350Health$9,000International$5,250Human Services$4,100Environment$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC: $56,863 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD: $48,072 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELLOSGUARDO FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Cancer Fund of Dallas inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Cultural Trust Council: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE SUPPLY CO: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JF KAPNEK CHARITABLE TRUST: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAN MARCOS HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI FOUNDATION: $650 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR GOLF ASSOCIATION OF ARIZONA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUTCHINSON COMMUNITY COLLEGE ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of the Valley: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Make It Possible Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Make It Possible Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Lutheran World Relief Inc: 47% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Make It Possible’s filings →

More from the funding graph